Abstract
While there is a substantial body of literature on academics’ development as teachers, investigation of their development as researchers post-PhD is rare. This study undertook an investigation of academics’ ways of understanding their own growth and development as a university researcher. Four qualitatively different ways of understanding research development emerged: (1) Becoming confident as a researcher; (2) Becoming recognised as a researcher; (3) Becoming more productive as a researcher; and (4) Becoming more sophisticated as a researcher. The first category of development was seen as most relevant to the early stages of an academic career, when doing a PhD or during one’s first academic appointment, but may also re-occur at later stages of a career during changes in research direction, etc. The last three categories are seen as relevant to all career stages, including more advanced stages as well as the early stages of a research career. Comparisons between academics’ ways of understanding their growth and development as a university researcher and as a university teacher are also presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher—variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375–390.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2005a). Academic growth and development—how do university academics experience it? Higher Education, 50, 1–32.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2005b). Variation and commonality in the phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 321–334.
Åkerlind, G. S. (in press) Academics’ views of research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education.
Bills, D. (2004). Supervisors’ conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development. International Journal for Academic Development, 9, 85–97.
Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: a phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 271–285.
Bowden, J., Green, P., Barnacle, R., Cherry, N., & Usher, R. (2005). Academics’ ways of understanding success in research activities. In J Bowden, & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 145–155). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Bruce, C., Pham, B., & Stoodley, I. (2004). Constituting the significance and value of research: Views from information technology academics and industry professionals. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 219–238.
Dahlgren, L. (1995). Lars Dahlgren on phenomenography. In R. Gerber, & C. Bruce (Eds.), Phenomenography: Quantitative research: Theory and applications. Video 2. Qld Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
Ingerman, Å., & Booth, S. (2003). Expounding on physics: A phenomenographic study of physicists talking of their physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1489–1508.
Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: what are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 245–262.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pham, B., Bruce, C., & Stoodley, I. (2005). Constituting information technology research: The experience of IT researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 24, 215–232.
Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Middleton, H. (in press). University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science.
Trigwell, K. (2000). A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In J. Bowden, & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 62–82). Melbourne: RMIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Åkerlind, G.S. Growing and developing as a university researcher. High Educ 55, 241–254 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9052-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9052-x