Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The last quarter-century bore witness to a sea change in academic involvement with commerce. Widespread university-based efforts to identify, manage, and market intellectual property (IP) have accompanied broad shifts in the relationship between academic and proprietary approaches to the dissemination and use of science and engineering research. Such transformations are indicators of institutional changes at work in the environment faced by universities. This paper draws upon a fifteen-year panel (1981–1995) of university-level data for 87 research-intensive US campuses in order to document trends and transitions in relationships among multiple indicators of academic and commercial engagement. The institutional environment for public and private science is volatile, shifting in fits and starts from a situation conducive to organizational learning through high volume patenting to a more challenging arrangement that links indiscriminate pursuit of IP with declines in both the volume and impact of academic science. The pattern and timing of these transitions may support an enduring system of stratification that offers increasing returns to first-movers while limiting the opportunities available to universities that are later entrants to the commercial realm. Unpacking the systematic effects of university research commercialization requires focused attention on the sources and trajectories of profound institutional change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Agrawal R. Henderson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT’ Management Science 48 44–60 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Arora (1996) ArticleTitle‘Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note’ Economics Letters 50 51–55 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-1765(95)00707-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Arora A. Gambardella (1990) ArticleTitle‘Complementarity and external linkages–the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology’ Journal of Industrial Economics 38 361–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of University Techology Managers. (2000). ‘Licensing Survey, FY 2000: Full Report’, Association of University Technology Managers.

  • Athey, S. and Stern, S. (1998). ‘Am Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complementarity in Organizational Design’, NBER Working Paper #6600.

  • E.G. Campbell J.S. Weissman N. Causino D. Blumenthal (2000) ArticleTitle‘Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials’ Research Policy 29 303–312 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00068-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.R. Clark (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation Published for the IAU Press by Pergamon Press Oxford; New York

    Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Clemens J.M. Cook (1999) ArticleTitle‘Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change’ Annual Review of Sociology 25 441–466 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Dasgupta P.A. David (1987) ‘Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology’ G.R. Feiwel (Eds) Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory University Press New York 659–589

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Dasgupta P.A. David (1994) ArticleTitle‘Toward a new economics of science’ Research Policy 23 487–521 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desruisseaux, P. (2000). ‘Universities venture into venture capitalism’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 5/26/2000, A44.

  • P.J. Dimaggio W.W. Powell (1983) ArticleTitle ‘The iron cage revisited–Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’ American Sociological Review 48 147–160

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Eisenberg (2003) ArticleTitle‘Science and the law--Patent swords and shields’ Science 299 1018–1019 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1081790 Occurrence Handle12586927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • P. England (1992) Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence Aldine De Gruyter New York

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Etzkowitz (2003) ArticleTitle‘Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university’ Research Policy 32 109–121 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Etzkowitz L. Leydesdorff (1998) ArticleTitle‘The endless transition: A ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government relations’ Minerva 36 203–208 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004348123030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Etzkowitz A. Webster P. Healey (1998) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia State University of New York Press Albany, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Geiger (1993) Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II Oxford University Press NY

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gibbons H. Nowotny C. Limoges M. Trow S. Schwartzman P. Scott (1994) The New Production of Knowledge Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Heller R.S. Eisenberg (1998) ArticleTitle‘Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research’ Science 280 698–701 Occurrence Handle9563938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D. Hicks T. Breitzman D. Olivastro K. Hamilton (2001) ArticleTitle‘The changing composition of innovative activity in the US–a portrait based on patent analysis’ Research Policy 30 681–703 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00147-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.B. Jaffe M. Trajtenberg (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovation: A window on the knowledge economy. MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kennedy (2003) ArticleTitle‘Industry and academia in transition’ Science 302 1293–1293 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.302.5649.1293 Occurrence Handle14631000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • C. Kerr (2002) ‘Shockwave II: An Introduction to the 21st Century’ S.G. Brint (Eds) The Future of the City of Intellect Stanford University Press Stanford 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Kleinman (1995) Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States Duke University Press Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L Kleinman (1998) ArticleTitle‘Untangling context: Understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 23 285–314

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Kleinman S.P. Vallas (2001) ArticleTitle‘Science, capitalism, and the rise of the ‘knowledge worker’ :The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States’ Theory and Society 30, 451–492 30 451–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.S. (1994). ‘Technology-transfer and public-policy in an age of global economic competition–introduction to the symposium’, Policy Studies Journal 22, 260–266.

  • E. Mansfield (1991) ArticleTitle‘Academic research and industrial-innovation’ Research Policy 20 1–12 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Mansfield J.Y. Lee (1996) ArticleTitle‘The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support’ Research Policy 25 1047–1058 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. McSherry (2001) Who Owns Academic Work?: Battling for Control of Intellectual Property Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Merton (1968) ArticleTitle‘The Matthew effect in science’ Science 159 56 Occurrence Handle5634379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R.K. Merton (1988) ArticleTitle‘The Matthew effect in science 2. cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property’ Isis 79 606–623 Occurrence Handle10.1086/354848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Meyer B. Rowan (1977) ArticleTitle‘Institutionalized organizations–formal-structure as myth and ceremony’ American Journal of Sociology 83 340–363 Occurrence Handle10.1086/226550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, C. (2004). ‘Institutional change through interstitial emergence: The growth of alternative dispute resolution in american Law, 1965--1995’, Forthcoming in Powell, W.W. and Jones, D.L. (eds.), How Institutions Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • D.C. Mowery R.R. Nelson B.N. Sampat A.A. Ziedonis (2001) ArticleTitle‘The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980’ Research Policy 30 99–119 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Myers (1995) ArticleTitle‘From discovery to invention–the writing and rewriting of 2 patents’ Social Studies of Science 25 57–105

    Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Nelson S.G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Neuer (1995) ArticleTitle‘Academic technology transfer offices evolve into marketing units’ The Scientist 9 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Owen-Smith (2003) ArticleTitle‘From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities’ Research Policy 32 1081–1104 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2001a) ArticleTitle‘Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences’ The Transformation of Work, a special issue of Research in the Sociology of Work 10 109–140

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2001b) ArticleTitle‘To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success in academic patenting’ Journal of Technology Transfer 26 99–114 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007892413701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Owen-Smith M. Riccaboni F. Pammolli W.W. Powell (2002) ArticleTitle‘A comparison of US and European university-industry relations in the life sciences’ Management Science 48 24–43 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.24.14275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Packer A. Webster (1996) ArticleTitle‘Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 21 227–253

    Google Scholar 

  • W.W. Powell J. Owen-Smith (1998) ArticleTitle‘Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 253–277 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199821)17:2<253::AID-PAM8>3.0.CO;2-G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.W. Powell J. Owen-Smith (2002) ‘The new world of knowledge production in the life sciences’ S.G. Brint (Eds) The Future of the City of Intellect Stanford University Press Stanford 107–132

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rip (1986) ‘Mobilizing resources through texts’ M. Callon (Eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World The Macmillan Press Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Rosenberg (2000) Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives Routledge London; New York

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Rosenberg R.R. Nelson (1994) ArticleTitle ‘American universities and technical advance in industry’ Research Policy 23 323–348 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.N. Sampat R.R. Nelson (1999) The Emergence and Standardization of University Technology Transfer Offices: A Case Study of Institutional Change Columbia University New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W.R. Scott M. Ruef P.J. Mendel C.A. Caronna (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: from Professional Dominance to Managed Care University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • W.H. Sewell (1992) ArticleTitle‘A theory of structure–duality, agency, and transformation’ American Journal of Sociology 98 1–29 Occurrence Handle10.1086/229967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.D. Sine S. Scott D. Gregorio ParticleDi (2003) ArticleTitle‘The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions’ Management Science 49 478–496 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Slaughter G. Rhoades (1996) ArticleTitle‘The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 21 303–339

    Google Scholar 

  • A.L. Stinchcombe (1978) Theoretical Methods in Social History Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Thursby M.C. Thursby (2002) ArticleTitle‘Who is selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of growth in university licensing’ Management Science 48 90–104 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.G. Zucker (1977) ArticleTitle‘Role of institutionalization in cultural persistence’ American Sociological Review 42 726–743

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Owen-smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Owen-smith, J. Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science. High Educ 49, 91–117 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2916-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2916-4

Keywords

Navigation