Abstract
The last quarter-century bore witness to a sea change in academic involvement with commerce. Widespread university-based efforts to identify, manage, and market intellectual property (IP) have accompanied broad shifts in the relationship between academic and proprietary approaches to the dissemination and use of science and engineering research. Such transformations are indicators of institutional changes at work in the environment faced by universities. This paper draws upon a fifteen-year panel (1981–1995) of university-level data for 87 research-intensive US campuses in order to document trends and transitions in relationships among multiple indicators of academic and commercial engagement. The institutional environment for public and private science is volatile, shifting in fits and starts from a situation conducive to organizational learning through high volume patenting to a more challenging arrangement that links indiscriminate pursuit of IP with declines in both the volume and impact of academic science. The pattern and timing of these transitions may support an enduring system of stratification that offers increasing returns to first-movers while limiting the opportunities available to universities that are later entrants to the commercial realm. Unpacking the systematic effects of university research commercialization requires focused attention on the sources and trajectories of profound institutional change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Agrawal R. Henderson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT’ Management Science 48 44–60 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279
A. Arora (1996) ArticleTitle‘Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note’ Economics Letters 50 51–55 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-1765(95)00707-5
A. Arora A. Gambardella (1990) ArticleTitle‘Complementarity and external linkages–the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology’ Journal of Industrial Economics 38 361–379
Association of University Techology Managers. (2000). ‘Licensing Survey, FY 2000: Full Report’, Association of University Technology Managers.
Athey, S. and Stern, S. (1998). ‘Am Empirical Framework for Testing Theories about Complementarity in Organizational Design’, NBER Working Paper #6600.
E.G. Campbell J.S. Weissman N. Causino D. Blumenthal (2000) ArticleTitle‘Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials’ Research Policy 29 303–312 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00068-2
B.R. Clark (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation Published for the IAU Press by Pergamon Press Oxford; New York
E.S. Clemens J.M. Cook (1999) ArticleTitle‘Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change’ Annual Review of Sociology 25 441–466 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.441
P. Dasgupta P.A. David (1987) ‘Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology’ G.R. Feiwel (Eds) Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory University Press New York 659–589
P. Dasgupta P.A. David (1994) ArticleTitle‘Toward a new economics of science’ Research Policy 23 487–521 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
Desruisseaux, P. (2000). ‘Universities venture into venture capitalism’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 5/26/2000, A44.
P.J. Dimaggio W.W. Powell (1983) ArticleTitle ‘The iron cage revisited–Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’ American Sociological Review 48 147–160
R.S. Eisenberg (2003) ArticleTitle‘Science and the law--Patent swords and shields’ Science 299 1018–1019 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1081790 Occurrence Handle12586927
P. England (1992) Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence Aldine De Gruyter New York
H. Etzkowitz (2003) ArticleTitle‘Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university’ Research Policy 32 109–121 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
H. Etzkowitz L. Leydesdorff (1998) ArticleTitle‘The endless transition: A ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government relations’ Minerva 36 203–208 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004348123030
H. Etzkowitz A. Webster P. Healey (1998) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia State University of New York Press Albany, NY
R.L. Geiger (1993) Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II Oxford University Press NY
M. Gibbons H. Nowotny C. Limoges M. Trow S. Schwartzman P. Scott (1994) The New Production of Knowledge Sage London
M.A. Heller R.S. Eisenberg (1998) ArticleTitle‘Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research’ Science 280 698–701 Occurrence Handle9563938
D. Hicks T. Breitzman D. Olivastro K. Hamilton (2001) ArticleTitle‘The changing composition of innovative activity in the US–a portrait based on patent analysis’ Research Policy 30 681–703 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00147-5
A.B. Jaffe M. Trajtenberg (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovation: A window on the knowledge economy. MIT Press Cambridge, MA
D. Kennedy (2003) ArticleTitle‘Industry and academia in transition’ Science 302 1293–1293 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.302.5649.1293 Occurrence Handle14631000
C. Kerr (2002) ‘Shockwave II: An Introduction to the 21st Century’ S.G. Brint (Eds) The Future of the City of Intellect Stanford University Press Stanford 1–19
D.L. Kleinman (1995) Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States Duke University Press Durham
D.L Kleinman (1998) ArticleTitle‘Untangling context: Understanding a university laboratory in the commercial world’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 23 285–314
D.L. Kleinman S.P. Vallas (2001) ArticleTitle‘Science, capitalism, and the rise of the ‘knowledge worker’ :The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States’ Theory and Society 30, 451–492 30 451–492
Lee, Y.S. (1994). ‘Technology-transfer and public-policy in an age of global economic competition–introduction to the symposium’, Policy Studies Journal 22, 260–266.
E. Mansfield (1991) ArticleTitle‘Academic research and industrial-innovation’ Research Policy 20 1–12 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A
E. Mansfield J.Y. Lee (1996) ArticleTitle‘The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support’ Research Policy 25 1047–1058 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1
C. McSherry (2001) Who Owns Academic Work?: Battling for Control of Intellectual Property Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass
R.K. Merton (1968) ArticleTitle‘The Matthew effect in science’ Science 159 56 Occurrence Handle5634379
R.K. Merton (1988) ArticleTitle‘The Matthew effect in science 2. cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property’ Isis 79 606–623 Occurrence Handle10.1086/354848
J.W. Meyer B. Rowan (1977) ArticleTitle‘Institutionalized organizations–formal-structure as myth and ceremony’ American Journal of Sociology 83 340–363 Occurrence Handle10.1086/226550
Morrill, C. (2004). ‘Institutional change through interstitial emergence: The growth of alternative dispute resolution in american Law, 1965--1995’, Forthcoming in Powell, W.W. and Jones, D.L. (eds.), How Institutions Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
D.C. Mowery R.R. Nelson B.N. Sampat A.A. Ziedonis (2001) ArticleTitle‘The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980’ Research Policy 30 99–119 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
G. Myers (1995) ArticleTitle‘From discovery to invention–the writing and rewriting of 2 patents’ Social Studies of Science 25 57–105
R.R. Nelson S.G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass
A. Neuer (1995) ArticleTitle‘Academic technology transfer offices evolve into marketing units’ The Scientist 9 1–4
J. Owen-Smith (2003) ArticleTitle‘From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities’ Research Policy 32 1081–1104 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7
J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2001a) ArticleTitle‘Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences’ The Transformation of Work, a special issue of Research in the Sociology of Work 10 109–140
J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2001b) ArticleTitle‘To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success in academic patenting’ Journal of Technology Transfer 26 99–114 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007892413701
J. Owen-Smith M. Riccaboni F. Pammolli W.W. Powell (2002) ArticleTitle‘A comparison of US and European university-industry relations in the life sciences’ Management Science 48 24–43 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.24.14275
K. Packer A. Webster (1996) ArticleTitle‘Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 21 227–253
W.W. Powell J. Owen-Smith (1998) ArticleTitle‘Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 253–277 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199821)17:2<253::AID-PAM8>3.0.CO;2-G
W.W. Powell J. Owen-Smith (2002) ‘The new world of knowledge production in the life sciences’ S.G. Brint (Eds) The Future of the City of Intellect Stanford University Press Stanford 107–132
A. Rip (1986) ‘Mobilizing resources through texts’ M. Callon (Eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World The Macmillan Press Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire
N. Rosenberg (2000) Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives Routledge London; New York
N. Rosenberg R.R. Nelson (1994) ArticleTitle ‘American universities and technical advance in industry’ Research Policy 23 323–348 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6
B.N. Sampat R.R. Nelson (1999) The Emergence and Standardization of University Technology Transfer Offices: A Case Study of Institutional Change Columbia University New York
W.R. Scott M. Ruef P.J. Mendel C.A. Caronna (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: from Professional Dominance to Managed Care University of Chicago Press Chicago
W.H. Sewell (1992) ArticleTitle‘A theory of structure–duality, agency, and transformation’ American Journal of Sociology 98 1–29 Occurrence Handle10.1086/229967
W.D. Sine S. Scott D. Gregorio ParticleDi (2003) ArticleTitle‘The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions’ Management Science 49 478–496 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.49.4.478.14416
S. Slaughter G. Rhoades (1996) ArticleTitle‘The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 21 303–339
A.L. Stinchcombe (1978) Theoretical Methods in Social History Academic Press New York
J.G. Thursby M.C. Thursby (2002) ArticleTitle‘Who is selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of growth in university licensing’ Management Science 48 90–104 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.90.14271
L.G. Zucker (1977) ArticleTitle‘Role of institutionalization in cultural persistence’ American Sociological Review 42 726–743
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Owen-smith, J. Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science. High Educ 49, 91–117 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2916-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2916-4