Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposition of potential efficiency gains from hospital mergers in Greece

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper evaluates the technical efficiency of 71 Greek public hospitals and examines potential efficiency gains from 13 candidate mergers among them. Efficiency assessments are performed using bootstrapped Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) whilst merger analysis is conducted by applying the Bogetoft and Wang methodology which allows the overall potential merger gains to be decomposed into three main components of inefficiency, namely technical (or learning), scope (or harmony) and scale (or size) effects. Thus, the analysis provides important insights not only on the magnitude of the potential total efficiency gains but also on their sources. The overall analysis is conducted in the context of a complete methodological framework where methods for outlier detection, returns to scale identification, and bias corrections for DEA estimations are also applied. Mergers are analyzed under the assumptions of constant, variable and non-decreasing returns to scale in an input oriented DEA model with three inputs and three outputs. The main finding of the study indicates that almost all mergers show substantial potential room for efficiency improvement, which is mainly attributed to the pre-merger technical inefficiencies of the individual hospitals and therefore it might be possible to be achieved without the need of implementing full-scale mergers. The same -though, at a lower extent- applies to the harmony effect whilst the size effect shows marginal or even negative gains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kontodimopoulos N, Nanos P, Niakas D (2006) Balancing efficiency of health services and equity of access in remote areas in Greece. Health Policy 76:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aletras V, Kontodimopoulos N, Zagouldoudis A, Niakas D (2007) The short-term effect on technical and scale efficiency of establishing regional health systems and general management in Greek NHS hospitals. Health Policy 83(2):236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimas G, Goula A, Soulis S (2010) Productive performance and its components in Greek public hospitals. Int J Oper Res 12(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flokou A, Kontodimopoulos N, Niakas D (2011) Employing post-DEA Cross-evaluation and cluster analysis in a sample of Greek NHS Hospitals. J Med Syst 35(5):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Polyzos N (2012) A three-year performance evaluation of the NHS Hospitals in Greece. Hippokratia 16:350–355

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kounetas K, Papathanassopoulos F (2013) How efficient are Greek hospitals? A case study using a double bootstrap DEA approach. Eur J Health Econ 14:979–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katharakis G, Katharaki M, Katostaras T (2014) An empirical study of comparing DEA and SFA methods to measure hospital units’ efficiency. Int J Oper Res 21(3):341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Niakas D (2013) Greek economic crisis and health care reforms: correcting the wrong prescription. Int J Health Serv 43:597–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liaropoulos L, Siskou O, Kontodimopoulos N, Kaitelidou D, Lazarou P, Spinthouri M, Tsavalias K (2012) Restructuring the hospital sector in Greece in order to improve effectiveness and efficiency. Soc Cohesion Dev 7(1):53–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity (2011) Proposal for functioning rearrangements of the NHS health units. Ministry of Health and Social Solidarity, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nikolentzos A, Kontodimopoulos N, Polyzos N, Thireos E, Tountas Y (2015) Reengineering NHS Hospitals in Greece: redistribution leads to rational mergers. Glob J Health Sci 7(5):272–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bogetoft P, Wang D (2005) Estimating the potential gains from mergers. J Prod Anal 23(2):145–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gourlay A, Ravishankar G, Weyman-Jones T (2005) Non-parametric analysis of efficiency gains from bank mergers in India. Working paper 2006–17, Department of Economics, Loughborough University. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/sbe/RePEc/lbo/lbowps/Gourlay_Ravishankar_Weyman_Jones_Indian_Banks.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2015

  14. Walter M, Cullmann A (2008) Potential gains from mergers in local public transport - an efficiency analysis applied to Germany. Technical report. Technische Universitat Dresden. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.89947.de/dp832.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2015

  15. Agrell P, Bogetoft P, Grammeltvedt T (2015) The efficiency of the regulation for horizontal mergers among electricity distribution operators in Norway. European Energy Market http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7216685&isnumber=7216596. Accessed 28 June 2015

  16. Bagdadioglu N, Waddams Price C, Weyman-Jones T (2007) Measuring potential gains from mergers among electricity distribution companies in Turkey using a non-parametric model. Energy J 28(2):83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simper R, Weyman-Jones T (2008) Evaluating gains from mergers in a non-parametric public good model of police services. Ann Public Coop Econ 79(1):3–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zschille M (2015) Consolidating the water industry: an analysis of the potential gains from horizontal integration in a conditional efficiency framework. J Prod Anal 44(1):97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kristensen T, Bogetoft P, Pedersen KM (2010) Potential gains from hospital mergers in Denmark. Health Care Manag Sci 13:334–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris J, Ozgen H, Ozcan Y (2000) Do mergers enhance the performance of hospital efficiency? J Oper Res Soc 51(7):801–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrier G, Valmanis V (2004) Do mergers improve hospital productivity? J Oper Res Soc 55:1071–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Groff JE, Lien D, Su J (2007) Measuring efficiency gains from hospital mergers. Res Healthc Fin Manag 11(1):77–90

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kjekshus L, Hagen T (2007) Do hospital mergers increase hospital efficiency? Evidence from a National Health Service country. J Health Serv Res Po 12(4):230–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Park JS, Fowler KL, Giebel SA (2011) Measuring hospital operating efficiencies for strategic decisions. Int J Bus Soc Sci 2(13):56–60

    Google Scholar 

  25. Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Farell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc 120:252–281, Series A

    Google Scholar 

  27. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper W (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bogetoft P, Otto L (2011) Benchmarking with DEA, SFA and R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Banker RD (1984) Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 17:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39(10):1261–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFORS 37:174–187

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson PW (1993) Detecting outliers in deterministic non-parametric frontier models with multiple outputs. J Bus Econ Stat 11:319–323

    Google Scholar 

  33. Banker RD, Chang H (2006) The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units. Eur J Oper Res 175:1311–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Doyle J, Green R (1994) Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J Oper Res Soc 45:567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Simar L, Wilson P (1998) Sensitive analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manag Sci 44(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Simar L, Wilson PW (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Prod Anal 13(1):49–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Simar L, Wilson PW (2001) Nonparametric tests of returns to scale. Eur J Oper Res 139:115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Samoilenko S, Osei-Bryson KM (2010) Determining sources of relative inefficiency inheterogeneous samples: methodology using cluster analysis, DEA and neural networks. Eur J Oper Res 206(2):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Athanassopoulos A, Gounaris C (2001) Assessing the technical and allocative efficiency of hospital operations in Greece and its resource allocation implications. Eur J Oper Res 133:416–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ozcan YA (2014) Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: an assessment using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), 2nd edn. Springer, Newton

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ozcan YA (1992–1993) Sensitivity analysis of hospital efficiency under alternative output/input and peer groups: a review. Knowl Pol 5(4):1–29

  42. Kazley AS, Ozcan YA (2009) Electronic medical record use and efficiency: a DEA and windows analysis of hospitals. Socioecon Plan Sci 43(3):209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Harrison J, Coppola N, Wakefield M (2004) Efficiency of federal hospitals in the United States. J Med Syst 28:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Helmig B, Lapsley I (2001) On the efficiency of public, welfare and private hospitals in Germany over time—A sectoral DEAStudy. Health Serv Manag Res 14:263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Magnussen J (1996) Efficiency measurement and the operationalization of hospital production. Health Serv Res 31:21–37

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dyson R, Allen R, Camanho A, Podinovski V, Sarrico C, Shale E (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132:245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ozcan YA, Luke RD (1993) A national study of the efficiency of hospitals in urban markets. Health Serv Res 27:719–739

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chilingerian J, Sherman HD (2011) Health care applications: from hospitals to physicians, from productive efficiency to quality frontiers. In: Cooper W, Seiford LM, Zhu J (eds) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer, New York, p 495

    Google Scholar 

  49. Roemer MI, Moustafa AT, Hopkins CE (1968) A proposed hospital quality index: hospital death rates adjusted for case severity. Health Serv Res 3(2):96–118

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sulku SN (2012) The health sector reforms and the efficiency of public hospitals in Turkey: provincial markets. Eur J Public Health 22:634–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Weaver M, Deolalikar A (2004) Economies of scale and scope in Vietnamese hospitals. Soc Sci Med 59:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Aletras V, Jones A, Sheldon T (1997) Economies of scale and scope. In: Ferguson B, Sheldon T, Posnett J (eds) Concentration and choice in healthcare. Financial Times Healthcare, London, pp 23–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angeliki Flokou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flokou, A., Aletras, V. & Niakas, D. Decomposition of potential efficiency gains from hospital mergers in Greece. Health Care Manag Sci 20, 467–484 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-016-9365-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-016-9365-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation