Abstract
Because the demand for health services outstrips the available resources, priority setting is one of the most difficult issues faced by health policy makers, particularly those in developing countries. Priority setting in developing countries is fraught with uncertainty due to lack of credible information, weak priority setting institutions, and unclear priority setting processes. Efforts to improve priority setting in these contexts have focused on providing information and tools. In this paper we argue that priority setting is a value laden and political process, and although important, the available information and tools are not sufficient to address the priority setting challenges in developing countries. Additional complementary efforts are required. Hence, a strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries should also include: (i) capturing current priority setting practices, (ii) improving the legitimacy and capacity of institutions that set priorities, and (iii) developing fair priority setting processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Singer PA (2000) Recent advances in medical ethics. Br Med J 321:282–285
Bryant JH (2000) Health priority dilemmas in developing countries. In: Coulter A, Ham C (eds) The global challenge of health care rationing. Open University Press, Philadelphia, pp 63–73
Klein R (1998) Puzzling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process. Br Med J 317:959–960
Buse K. (1999) Keeping a tight grip on the reigns: donor control over aid coordination and management in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan 14(3):219–228
Klein R, Williams A (2000) Setting priorities: what is holding us back—inadequate information or inadequate institutions? In: Coulter A, Ham C (eds) The global challenge of health care rationing. Open University Press, Philadelphia, pp 15–26
Wikler D (2003) Why prioritize when there isn’t enough money? Cost Effectiveness Res Allocation 1(1):5–7
http://www.who.int/countries/en/Accessed on January, 21st 2006
Steen HS, Jareg P, Olsen IT (2001) Providing a core set of health interventions for the poor. Towards developing a framework for reviewing and planning—a systemic approach. Background document. Oslo: Centre for health and social development. Unpublished Report
Holm S (2000) The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to simple solutions. Br Med J 317(7164):1000–1002.
Haudemaekers R, Dekkers W (2003) Justice and solidarity in priority setting in health care. Health care Anal. 11(4):325–343
http://www.who.int/choice/description/en/Accessed on January 21st 2006
Kapiriri L, Arnesen T, Norheim OF (2004) Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda. Cost Effectiveness Resour Allocation 2(1):1–11
Kapiriri L, Norheim OF (2004) Criteria for priority setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders’ values. Bull World Health Organ 82:172–179
Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Heggenhougen K (2003a) Using the burden of disease information for health planning in developing countries: experiences from Uganda. Soc Sci Med 56(12):2433–2441
Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Heggenhougen K (2003b) Public participation in health planning and priority setting at the district level in Uganda. Health policy plan 18(2):205–213
Evans DB, Adam T (2005) Achieving the millennium development goals for health: Evaluation of current strategies and future priorities for improving health in developing countries. BMJ, doi:10.1136/BMJ.38658.561123.7C
Kleinman A (March 1999) Ethics and Experience: An Anthropological Approach to Health Equity. Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies Working Paper Series 99.04, pp 6. Harvard University, Boston. Unpublished document
Fraser DW (2000) Overlooked opportunities for investing in health research and development. Bull World Health Organ 78(8):1054–1061
Martin DK, Singer PA (2003) A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions. Health Care Anal 11(1):59–68
Ham C, Roberts G (2003) Reasonable Rationing: International Experience of Priority Setting in Health Care. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK, p 156
Mielke J, Martin DK, Singer PA (2003) Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: Qualitative case study. Crit Care Med 31(12):2809–2811
Singer PA, Martin DK, Giacomini M, Purdy L (2000) Priority Setting for New Technologies in Medicine: A Qualitative Case Study. Br Med J 321:1316–1318
Martin DK, Shulman K, Santiago-Sorrell P, Singer PA (2003) Priority Setting and Hospital Strategic Planning: A Qualitative Case Study. J Health Serv Res Policy 8:197–201
Madden S, Martin DK, Downey S, Singer PA (2005) Hospital Priority Setting with an Appeals Process: A qualitative case study and evaluation. Health Policy 73:10–20
Walton NA, Martin DK, Peter EH, Pringle DM, Singer PA (2006) Priority setting and cardiac surgery: A qualitative case study. Health Policy (in press)
Gibson JL, Martin DK, Singer PA (2005) Evidence, Economics and Ethics: Resource Allocation in Health Services Organizations. Health Care Q 8:50–59
Daniels N, Sabin JE (2002) Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources? Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY, pp 26–28
Daniels N, Bryant J, Castano RA (2000) Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform: A policy tool for developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 78(6):740–750
Good MJ (1995) Cultural studies of biomedicine: An agenda for research. Soc Sci Med 41:4461–73
O’Dempsey TJ, Munslow B. Globalisation (2006) Complex humanitarian emergencies and health. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 100(5–6):501–515
Waddington C (2004) Does earmarked donor funding make it more or less likely that developing countries will allocate their resources towards programs that yield the greatest health benefits? Bull World Health Organ 82(9)703–706
Sundewall J, Sahlin-Andersson K (2006) Translations of health sector SWAPs- A comparative study of health sector development cooperation in Uganda, Zambia and Bangladesh. Health Policy 76:277–287
Benatar SR (2003) Priority setting: learning to make tough decisions; the costs of trying to provide modern medical care for all who could potentially benefit exceed the capacity of most countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 74(9):1185–1186
Hauck K, Smith PC, Goddard M (November 2003) The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care: A Literature Review. HNP Discussion Paper. World Bank, Washington DC. Unpublished paper
Terry LM (2004) An integrated approach to resource allocation. Health Care Anal 12(2):171–180
Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. University Press. New York, Columbia
Hasman A (2003) Eliciting Reasons: Empirical methods in priority setting. Health Care Anal 11(1):41–58
Hasman A, Holm S (2005) Accountability for Reasonableness: Opening the Black Box of Process. Health Care Anal 13(4):261–273
Mechanic D (1995) Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing. Br Med J 310:1655–1657
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapiriri, L., Martin, D.K. A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Developing Countries. Health Care Anal 15, 159–167 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0037-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0037-1