Abstract
A man with Alzheimer's who wanders around, a caregiver who disconnects the alarm, a daughter acting on het own, and a doctor who is not consulted set the stage for a feminist reflection on capacity/competence assessment. Feminist theory attempts to account for gender inequality in the political and in the epistemological realm. One of its tasks is to unravel the settings in which actual practices, i.c. capacity/competence assessment take place and offer an alternative. In this article the focus will be on a feminist ethics of care in which relationality, care, vulnerability, and responsibility are privileged concepts and attitudes. The emphasis on these notions leads to a specific view of autonomy that has consequences for both carereceivers (patients, clients) and caregivers (professional and not professional). These concepts constitute a default setting that shapes the context for capacity/competence assessment. Whereas this notion is meant to distinguish between those who need to be taken care of and those who do not, reflection on what it means to say ‘those who need to be taken care of’ is also required. The feminist analysis presented here emphasizes the necessity of the contextualization of assessment of competence. It sketches the multifold and complex grid that comprehends capacity assessment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barclay, L. (2000) Autonomy and the Social Self. In C. Mackenzie, and N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self(pp. 52–71). New York: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, T.L., and Childress, J.F. (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. (Previous Editions: 1979, 1983, 1989, 1994.)
Carse, A.L. (1995) Qualified Particularism and Affiliative Virtue: Emphasis of a Recent Turn in Ethics. Revista Medica de Chile: organo oficial de la Sociedad Medica de Santiago, Sociedad de Cirurgia de Chile, Sociedad Chilena de Gastro-enterologia, Sociedad, M´ edica de Antofagasta, Sociedad Chilena de Transfusi´ on y Hematologia 123(2), 241–249.
Chambers, T. (1996) From the Ethicist Point of View: The Literary Nature of Ethical Enquiry. The Hastings Center Report 26(1), 25–32.
Dodds, S. (2000) Choice and Control in Feminist Bioethics. In C. Mackenzie, and N. Stoljar (Eds.) Relational Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self.New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–235.
Donchin, A. (2000) Autonomy and Interdependence. Quandaries in Genetic Decision Making. In C. Mackenzie, and N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self(pp. 236–258). New York: Oxford University Press.
Donchin, A., and Purdy, L. (Eds.) (1999) Embodying Bioethics. Recent Feminist Advances. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Donchin, A., and Purdy, L. (1999) Introduction. In A. Donchin, and L. Purdy (Eds.), Embodying Bioethics. Recent Feminist Advances(pp. 1–13).New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Feder, K.E. (1999) Love's Labor. Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency.New York: Routledge.
Lindemann Nelson, H., and Lindemann Nelson, J. (1995) The Patient in the Family.London: Routledge.
Lindemann Nelson, H., and Lindemann Nelson, J. (1999) Justice in the Allocation of Health Care Resources: A Feminist Account. In J. Lindemann Nelson and H. Lindemann Nelson (Eds.), Meaning and Medicine. A Reader in the Philosophy of Health Care(pp. 289–301). New York: Routledge.
Little, M.O. (1999) Why a Feminist Approach to Bioethics? In J. Lindemann Nelson and H. Lindemann Nelsons (Eds.), Meaning and Medicine. A Reader in the Philosophy of Health Care(pp. 199–209). New York: Routledge.
Mackenzie, C., and Stoljar, N. (Eds.) (2000) Relational Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self.New York: Oxford.
MacKinnon, C. (1987) Feminism Unmodified.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sherwin, S. (1992) Feminism and Medical Ethics: Two Different Approaches to Contextual Ethics. In H. Bequart Holmes and L. Purdy (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Silberfeld, M., and Checkland, D. (1999) Faulty Judgement, Expert Opinion, and Decision-Making Capacity. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20, 377–393.
Tietjens Meyers, D. (2000) Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self? Opposites Attract! In C. Mackenzie, and N. Stoljar (Eds.) (2000) Relational Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self(pp. 151–180). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tong, R. (1999) Just Caring about Maternal-fetal Relations: The Case of Cocaine-using Pregnant Women. In A. Donchin, and L. Purdy (Eds.), Embodying Bioethics. Recent Feminist Advances(pp. 33–43). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument For an Ethic of Care.New York: Routledge.
Urban Walker, M. (1998) Moral Understandings. A Feminist Study in Ethics.New York: Routledge.
Warner, S. (2000) Feminist Theory, the Women's Liberation Movement and Therapy for Women: Changing our Concernss. Changes. An International Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy 18(4), 232–243.
Weisstub, D. (1999) Enquiry on Mental Competency.Toronto: Queen's Printer of Ontario.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maeckelberghe, E. Feminist Ethic of Care: A Third Alternative Approach. Health Care Analysis 12, 317–327 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-004-6639-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-004-6639-6