Skip to main content
Log in

Consensus-trust Driven Bidirectional Feedback Mechanism for Improving Consensus in Social Network Large-group Decision Making

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a consensus-trust driven framework of bidirectional interaction for social network large-group decision making. Firstly, the concepts of interaction consensus threshold and interaction trust threshold are defined, which are used to discriminate the interaction modes between subgroups into four categories. Corresponding hybrid feedback strategies are designed in which the consensus level and trust level of subgroups are regarded as reliable resources to facilitate the achievement of group consensus. Secondly, a minimum adjustment bidirectional feedback model considering cohesion is developed to help the interacting subgroups reach mutual consensus with minimum opinion modification. Finally, the proposed consensus framework is applied to a blockchain platform selection problem in supply chain to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai CG, Zhu QY, Sarkis J (2021) Joint blockchain service vendor-platform selection using social network relationships: a multi-provider multi-user decision perspective. Int J Prod Econ 238:108165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom CT, Bak-Coleman JB (2019) Gerrymandering in social networks. Nature 573(7772):40–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao MS, Wu J, Chiclana F, Ureña R, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) A personalized consensus feedback mechanism based on maximum harmony degree. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 51(10):6134–6146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao MS, Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) A bidirectional feedback mechanism for balancing group consensus and individual harmony in group decision making. Inf Fusion 76:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao MS, Liu YJ, Gai TT, Zhou M, Fujita H, Wu J (2022) A comprehensive star rating approach for cruise ships based on interactive group decision making with personalized individual semantics. J Mar Sci Eng 10:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao XR, Kou G, Peng Y, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2021) An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement. Inf Sci 575:499–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Zhang WW, Xu XH, Cao WZ (2022) Managing group confidence and consensus in intuitionistic fuzzy large group decision-making based on social media data mining. Group Decis Negot. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09787-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng D, Yuan YX, Wu Y, Hao TT, Cheng FX (2022) Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors. Eur J Oper Res 297(1):221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong QX, Cooper O (2016) A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making. Eur J Oper Res 250(2):21–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong QX, Sheng Q, Martínez L, Zhang Z (2022) An adaptive group decision making framework: individual and local world opinion based opinion dynamics. Inf Fusion 78:218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong YC, Xu YF, Yu S (2009) Computing the numerical scale of the linguistic term set for the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(6):1366–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du ZJ, Yu SM, Luo HY, Lin XD (2021) Consensus convergence in large-group social network environment: coordination between trust relationship and opinion similarity. Knowl Based Syst 217:106828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farshidi S, Jansen S, España S, Verkleij J (2020) Decision support for blockchain platform selection: three industry case studies. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 67(4):1109–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Zhang Z (2022) Consensus reaching with non-cooperative behavior management for personalized individual semantics-based social network group decision making. J Oper Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1997654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong ZW, Guo WW, Slowiński R (2021) Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction. Omega 104:102491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou FJ, Triantaphyllou E (2019) An iterative approach for achieving consensus when ranking a finite set of alternatives by a group of experts. Eur J Oper Res 275(2):570–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamis NH, Chiclana F, Levesley J (2019) An influence-driven feedback system for preference similarity network clustering based consensus group decision making model. Inf Fusion 52:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labella Á, Liu Y, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2018) Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: a comparative study. Appl Soft Comput 67:677–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labella A, Rodriguez RM, De Tre G, Martinez L (2019) A cohesion measure for improving the weighting of experts subgroups in large-scale group decision making clustering methods. 2019 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 1-6. 10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2019.8858858

  • Lai H, Liao HC (2021) A multi-criteria decision making method based on DNMA and CRITIC with linguistic D numbers for blockchain platform evaluation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 101:104200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Dong YC, Herrera F (2018) Personalized individual semantics based on consistency in hesitant linguistic group decision making with comparative linguistic expressions. Knowl Based Syst 145:156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Dong YC, Herrera F (2019) A consensus model for large-scale linguistic group decision making with a feedback recommendation based on clustered personalized individual semantics and opposing consensus group. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(2):221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SL, Rodríguez RM, Wei CP (2021) Managing manipulative and non-cooperative behaviors in large scale group decision making based on a WeChat-like interaction network. Inf Fusion 75:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YH, Kou G, Li GX, Yi P (2022) Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network. Eur J Oper Res 303(2):790–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Zhou Q, Ding RX, Palomares I, Herrera F (2019) Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. Eur J Oper Res 275(2):737–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu BS, Jiao SX, Shen YH, Chen Y, Wu GB, Chen S (2022) A dynamic hybrid trust network-based dual-path feedback consensus model for multi-attribute group decision-making in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 80:266–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WQ, Zhang HJ, Liang HM, Li CC, Dong YC (2022) Managing consistency and consensus issues in group decision-making with self-confident additive preference relations and without feedback: a nonlinear optimization method. Gr Decis Negot 31:213–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu YL, Xu YJ, Huang J, Wei J, Herrera-Viedma E (2022) Social network clustering and consensus-based distrust behaviors management for large-scale group decision-making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 117:108373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges. Inf Sci 207:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan XH, Wang YM, He SF, Chin K-S (2022) A dynamic programming algorithm based clustering model and its application to interval type-2 fuzzy large-scale group decision-making problem. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(1):108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(4):494–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin JD, Li MX, Liang YY (2022) Minimum cost consensus model for CRP-driven preference optimization analysis in large-scale group decision making using Louvain algorithm. Inf Fusion 80:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RM, Labella Á, Sesma-Sara M, Bustince H, Martínez L (2021) A cohesion-driven consensus reaching process for large scale group decision making under a hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets environment. Comput Ind Eng 155:107158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Q, Wu J, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2022) A dynamic feedback mechanism with attitudinal consensus threshold for minimum adjustment cost in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30:1287–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang M, Liao HC, Herrera-Viedma E, Chen CLP, Pedrycz W (2021) A dynamic adaptive subgroup-to-subgroup compatibility-based conflict detection and resolution model for multicriteria large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern 51(10):4784–4795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan QF, Xu XH, Chen XH, Zhuang J (2020) A two-stage optimization model for large-scale group decision-making in disaster management: minimizing group conflict and maximizing individual satisfaction. Gr Decis Negot 29:901–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wu J, Chiclana F, Sun Q, Herrera-Viedma E (2022) Two stage feedback mechanism with different power structures for consensus in large-scale group decision-making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3144536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications, vol 8. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chiclana F (2014) A social network analysis trust-consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 59:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context. Appl Soft Comput 35:827–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation. Knowl Based Syst 39:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Cao MS, Chiclana F, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) An optimal feedback model to prevent manipulation behaviour in consensus under social network group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 29(7):1750–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chen J, Liu W, Liu YJ, Liang CY, Cao MS (2022) A calibrated individual semantic based failure mode and effect analysis and its application in industrial internet platform. Mathematics 10:2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Wang S, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) Two-fold personalized feedback mechanism for social network consensus by uninorm interval trust propagation. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3076420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu T, Liu XW, Qin JD, Herrera F (2021) Balance dynamic clustering analysis and consensus reaching process with consensus evolution networks in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 29(2):357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZB, Tu JC (2021) Managing transitivity and consistency of preferences in AHP group decision making based on minimum modifications. Inf Fusion 67:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing YM, Cao MS, Liu YJ, Zhou M, Wu J (2022) A choquet integral based interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making for sustainable supplier selection. Comput Ind Eng 165:107935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu WJ, Chen X, Dong YC, Chiclana F (2021) Impact of decision rules and non-cooperative behaviors on minimum consensus cost in group decision making. Gr Decis Negot 30:1239–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XH, Zhang QH, Chen XH (2020) Consensus-based non-cooperative behaviors management in large-group emergency decision-making considering experts’ trust relations and preference risks. Knowl Based Syst 190:105108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu SM, Du ZJ, Zhang XY, Luo HY, Lin XD (2021) Punishment-driven consensus reaching model in social network large-scale decision-making with application to social capital selection. Appl Soft Comput Part A 113:107912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu SM, Du ZJ, Zhang XY, Luo HY, Lin XD (2021) Trust cop-kmeans clustering analysis and minimum-cost consensus model considering voluntary trust loss in social network large-scale decision-making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(7):2634–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu WY, Zhang Z, Zhong QY (2021) Consensus reaching for MAGDM with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: a minimum adjustment-based approach. Ann Oper Res 300(2):443–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan YX, Cheng D, Zhou ZL (2021) A minimum adjustment consensus framework with compromise limits for social network group decision making under incomplete information. Inf Sci 549:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LL, Yuan JJ, Gao XY, Jiang DW (2021) Public transportation development decision-making under public participation: a large-scale group decision-making method based on fuzzy preference relations. Technol Forecast Soc Change 172:121020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Li ZL (2021) Personalized individual semantics-based consistency control and consensus reaching in linguistic group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.3129510

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 71971135, 71971039 and 71910107002), Top-notch innovative program of Shanghai Maritime University (No. 2021YBR006), China Scholarship Council (No.202108310183)Shanghai Foreign Experts Program(22WZ2506100), project PID2019-103880RB-I00 funded by MCIN / AEI / 10.13039/501100011033 and by the Andalusian Government through the project P2000673.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gai, T., Cao, M., Chiclana, F. et al. Consensus-trust Driven Bidirectional Feedback Mechanism for Improving Consensus in Social Network Large-group Decision Making. Group Decis Negot 32, 45–74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09798-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09798-7

Keywords

Navigation