Abstract
This paper evaluates the proposed alternatives for sharing the Caspian Sea from the social planner’s or systems-level perspective with respect to the stakeholders’ utilities from the oil and natural gas resources of the sea. Different multi-criteria decision-making methods, namely dominance, maximin, lexicography, simple additive weighting, and TOPSIS are applied to determine the social planner’s ranking of these alternatives. Results suggest the Condominium governance regime as the most promising division method. Bankruptcy rules and cooperative game theory methods can be considered as the other socially optimal resolutions to the conflict over sharing the Caspian Sea energy resources among its five littoral countries. Consideration of these methods in negotiations may help with resolving the existing deadlock, which has been in place for two decades.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmadov A (2002) The primacy of national interests among littoral states in the Caspian basin. Duquesne University, Thesis
Borda JC (1781) Mémoire sur les elections au scrutin, Histoire de l’Academie Royale des Sciences
Brams SJ, Kilgour DM (2001) Fallback bargaining. Group Decis Negot 10(4):287–316
Chan LK, Kao HP, Ng A, Wu ML (1999) Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. Int J Prod Res 37(11):2499–2518
Churchman CW, Ackoff RL (1954) An approximate measure of value. J Oper Res Soc Am 2(2):172–187
Cohon JL, Marks DH (1975) Review and evaluation of multiobjective programming techniques. Water Res Res 11(2):208–220
Dagan N, Volji O (1993) The bankruptcy problem: a cooperative bargaining approach. Math Soc Sci 26:287–297
Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New York
Fishbrun PC (1964) Decision and value theory. Wiley, New York
Greening LA, Bernow S (2004) Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making. Energy Policy 32(6):721–735
Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Res Manag 21(9):1553–1566
Hipel KW (1992) Multiple objective decision-making in water-resources. J Am Water Res Assoc 28(1): 3–12
Hwang C, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin
Imen S, Madani K, Chang NB (2012) Bringing environmental benefits into Caspian Sea negotiations for resources allocation: cooperative Game Theory insights. In: Loucks ED (ed) 2012 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, pp 2264–2271, ASCE, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Kaliyeva D (2004) The geopolitical situation in the Caspian Sea. UNISCI Discussion Papers, Kazakhstan Institute for Strategic Studies
Linkov I, Varghese I, Jamil S, Seager T, Kiker G, Bridges T (2005) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites, comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making. NATO Sci Ser IV Earth Environ Sci 38(1): 15–54
Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381(3–4):225–238
Madani K (2011) Hydropower licensing and climate change: insights from game theory. Adv Water Res 34(2):174–183
Madani K (2013) Modeling international climate change negotiations more responsibly: can highly simplified game theory models provide reliable policy insights? Ecol Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.011
Madani K, Dinar A (2012a) Non-cooperative institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: application to groundwater. Ecol Econ 74:34–45
Madani K, Dinar A (2012b) Cooperative institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: application to groundwater. Water Res Res 48(9):W09553
Madani K, Gholizadeh S (2011) Game theory insights for the Caspian Sea conflict. In: Beighley RE II, Kilgore MW (eds) Proceeding of the 2011 world environmental and water resources congress, pp 2815–2819, ASCE, Palm Springs, CA
Madani K, Hipel KW (2011) Non-cooperative stability definitions for strategic analysis of generic water resources conflicts. Water Res Manag 25:1949–1977
Madani K, Lund JR (2011) A Monte-Carlo game theoretic approach for multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty. Adv Water Res 35(5):607–616
Matthews K (2001) Applying Genetic algorithms to multi-objective land-use planning. Dissertation, Robert Gordon University
Mokhtari S, Madani K, Chang NB (2012) Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty: application to the California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin delta problem. In: Loucks ED (ed) 2012 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, pp 2339–2348, ASCE, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Romero C, Rehman T (1987) Natural resource management and the use of multiple criteria decision-making techniques: a review. Eur Rev Agric Econ 14(1):61–89
Rouhani OM, Madani K, Gholizadeh S (2010) Caspian Sea negotiation support system. In: Proceeding of the 2010 world environmental and water resources congress, ASCE, Providence, Rhode Island, pp 2694–2702. doi:10.1061/41114(371)277
Shalikarian L, Madani K, Naeeni STO (2011) Finding the socially optimal solution for California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta problem. Proceeding of the 2011 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, pp. 3190–3197, ASCE, Palm Springs, California, Edited by: Beighley II R. E. and Kilgore M. W.
Sheikhmohammady M (2009) Modelling and analysis of multilateral negotiations. University of Waterloo, Dissertation
Sheikhmohammady M, Madani K (2008a) Bargaining over the Caspian Sea—the largest lake on the Earth. In: Babcock RW, Walton R (eds) ASCE, Proceeding of the 2008 world environmental and water resources congress, Honolulu, Hawaii. doi:10.1061/40976(316)262
Sheikhmohammady M, Madani K, (2008b) A descriptive model to analyse asymmetric multilateral negotiations. In: Proceeding of 2008 UCOWR/NIWR annual conference, international water resources: challenges for the 21st century & water resources education. Durham, North Carolina, North Carolina
Sheikhmohammady M, Madani K (2008c) Sharing a multi-national resource through bankruptcy procedures. In: Babcock RW, Walton R (eds) Proceeding of the 2008 world environmental and water resources congress, Honolulu, Hawaii, ASCE. doi:10.1061/40976(316)556
Sheikhmohammady M, Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2011) Modelling the Caspian Sea negotiations. Group Decis Negot 19(2):149–168
Sheikhmohammady M, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM (2012) Formal analysis of multilateral negotiations over the legal status of the Caspian Sea. Group Decis Negot 21(3):305–329
Shih H, Shyurb H, Lee ES (2007) An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math Comput Model 45:801–813
Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study. Kluwer, Boston
Tversky A (1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psychol Rev 76(1):31–48
Wald A (1945) Statistical decision functions which minimize the maximum risk. Ann Math 46(2):265–280
Wallenius J, Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Zionts S, Deb K (2008) Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manag Sci 54(7):1336–1349
Yaghoubi NM, Baradaran V, Shahraki MI (2011) Selecting contractor with cooperate VIKOR model (case study wheat flour mill). Bus Manag Rev 1(7):20–27
Young P (1995) Optimal voting rules. J Econ Perspect 9(1):51–64
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madani, K., Sheikhmohammady, M., Mokhtari, S. et al. Social Planner’s Solution for the Caspian Sea Conflict. Group Decis Negot 23, 579–596 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9345-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-013-9345-7