Skip to main content
Log in

MCDA Framework for Fishing Rights Allocation in South Africa

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work discussed in this paper relates to the allocation of fishing rights within the Western Cape province of South Africa. Many of these fisheries are under threat through over-exploitation, and yet are a traditional source of livelihood in many communities. We describe a sequence of interventions during which principles and processes of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) formed the framework for structuring the problems, for facilitating group consensus on the decision making process, and for designing a decision support template for use in future allocations. Interactions with community representatives and with the the national Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism revealed a high degree of consistency in perceptions of the management goals that need to be taken into consideration. These goals could be structured and summarized in the form of an integrated value tree, which in turn formed the basis for a formalized decision support structure that could provide a transparent, coherent and auditable basis for the allocation of fishing rights in a fully goal-directed manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bana e Costa CA, Ensslin L, Corrêa EC, Vansnick J (1999) Decision support systems in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process. Eur J Oper Res 113: 315–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML, Hobbs BF, Elliot E, Ellis H, Robinson Z (2001) An evaluation of multi-criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 10: 229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Ackermann F, Shepherd I (1997) Integrated support from problem structuring through to alternative evaluation using COPE and V.I.S.A. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 6: 115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojórquez LA, Sánchez-Colon S, Martinez AF (2005) Building consensus in environmental impact assessment through multicriteria modeling and sensitivity analysis. Environ Manag 36: 469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey A, Olson D (1998) Multiple criteria decision making models in group decision support. Group Decis Negot 7: 55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Ackermann F (1998) Making strategy: the journey of strategic management. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) SODA – the principles. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen RP (2004) Decisionarium – aiding decisions, negotiation and collecting opinions on the web. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12: 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joubert A, Stewart T, Scott L, Janssen R, Gilbert A, van Herwijnen M, Matthee J, de Vries L (2005) Fishing rights and small-scale fishers: An evaluation of the rights allocation process and the utilisation of fishing rights in south africa. Project report to the programme on Poverty Reduction and Environmental Management (PREM), Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, 2005. Available from www.premonline.nl

  • Kangas J, Kangas A, Leskinen P, Pykäläinen J (2001) MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on stated-owned lands in Finland: Applications and experiences. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 10: 257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Montibeller G, Belton V (2006) Causal maps and the evaluation of decision options – a review. J Oper Res Soc 57: 779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa (1998) Marine Living Resources Act, Act number 18

  • Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart TJ (1996) Robustness of additive value function methods in MCDM. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 5: 301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesgro (2001) The Western Cape fishing industry. Cape sector factsheet: Business sector updates from South Africa’s Western Cape. www.wesgro.org.za

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodor J. Stewart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, T.J., Joubert, A. & Janssen, R. MCDA Framework for Fishing Rights Allocation in South Africa. Group Decis Negot 19, 247–265 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9159-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9159-9

Keywords

Navigation