Skip to main content
Log in

Morpho-chemical characterization of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) genotypes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphological and chemical characterization of loquat genotypes were carried out to select superior genotypes between 2018 and 2021 in the coastal region of the Black Sea. In the study, the description of 70 genotypes with 20 g and above fruit weight of loquat, which is grown as chance seedlings in the mentioned region, was done. From the study, it was found soluble solids content (SSC) between 6.95 and 18.30%, acidity (AC) 0.22–0.82%, SSC/acidity ratio (SSCAcR) 16.39–67.68%, pH 2.85–4.94, dry matter ratio 47.29–54.73%, fresh weight (FreWe) 35.13–103.76 g, and dry weight (DW) 20.78–85.59 g. Considering morphological characteristics, leaf width (LWi) was found between 5.41 and 12.71 cm, leaf length (LL) 15.63–41.22 cm, leaf length/width ratio (LLWR) 1.37–5.57%, petiole diameter (PD) 3.74–8.00 mm, petiole length (PL) 8.87–46.72 mm, and leaf area between 77.59 and 312.92 cm2. A strongly negative correlation was observed between SSCAcR and AC (0.836). In contrast, significant positive correlation was found between DW and FreWe (0.636), pH and SSCAcR (0.544). In the case of chemical characteristics, the percentage of variances of components 1 to 5 respectively observed (29.13%, 20.37%, 14.96%, 10.84%, and 10.22%), which cumulatively encompassed 85.54% of variances. In the case of morphological characteristics, the correlation between LWi and LLWR (− 0.670), LL and LLWR (0.597), LWi and PD (0.311), LLWR and PD (− 0.312), PD and PL (− 0.260) obtained significant at P < 0.05. The percentage of variance explained by each principle component from components 1 to 4 respectively observed (28.54%, 22.18%, 16.06%, and 10.70%), which cumulatively encompassed 77.50% of variances. Finally, five genotypes, including GN10, GN14, GN50, GN68, and GN69, were determined superior among 70 genotypes. Based on the high “Weighed Rating” scores they received, they were suggested for further consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data are presented in the article.

References

  • Balcı MA (2015) Trabzon ili merkez ilçede yetişen yenidünya genotiplerinin (Eriobotrya Japonica Lindl.) pomolojik özellikleri üzerine araştırmalar. Master thesis. Ordu University. Ordu/Türkiye. (In turkish)

  • Badenes ML, Janick J, Lin S, Zhang Z, Liang GL, Wang W (2013) Breeding loquat (chapter. 5). In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 37, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

  • Çakır E, Öztürk A (2019) Samsun ili Tekkeköy ilçesinde yetişen ümitvar muşmula genotiplerinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı. Bilimleri Dergisi (UTYHBD) 5(2):240–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Durgaç C, Polat A, Kamiloğlu O (2006) Determining performances of some loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) cultivars under Mediterranean coastal conditions in Hatay, Turkey. New Z J Crop Hortic Sci 34:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsabagh AS, Haeikl AM (2012) Fruit characteristics evaluation of four new loquat genotypes grown in Egypt. Res J Agric Biol Sci 8(2):197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharaghani A, Solhjoo S, Oraguzie N (2016) A review of genetic resources of pome fruits in Iran. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63:151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0334-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Priyanka K, Sivanand C (2020) Loquat. In: Nayik GA, Gull A (eds) Antioxidants in fruits: properties and health benefits, 1rd edn. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7285-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain A, Abbasi NA, Hafiz AI, Akhtar A (2009) Morpho-physical characteristics of eight loquat genotypes cultivated in Chakwal District of Pakistan. Pak J Bot 41(6):2841–2849

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain A, Abbasi NA, Hafiz AI, ul Hasan SZ (2011) A comparison among five loquat genotypes cultivated at Hasan Abdal and Wah. Pak J Agri Sci 48(2):103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilhan G, Ercişli S (2021) Sugar and organic acids in ungrafted loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) Genotypes in Coruh Valley in Turkey. AGRORES, p 33. 10

  • Julkowska MM, Saade S, Agarwal G, Gao G, Pailles Y, Morton M, Awlia M, Tester M (2019) MVApp-multivariate analysis application for streamlined data analysis and curation. Plant Physiol 180(3):1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karadeniz T, Şenyurt M (2007) Pomological characterization of loquat selections of the Black Sea Region of Turkey. Acta Hort 750:113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang GL, Wang WX, Li XL, Guo QG, Xiang SQ, He Q (2011) Selection of large-fruited triploid plants of loquat. Acta Hort 887:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llácer G, Badenes ML, Martínez CJ (2003) Plant material of loquat in Mediterranean countries. First International Symposium on Loquat, 11–13 April 2002, Zaragoza, Spain

  • Maral E Samsun ili Çarşamba ilçesi muşmula genotiplerinin kimyasal ve fiziksel karakterizasyonu. Master thesis, University O (2019) Ordu/Türkiye. (in Turkish)

  • Özçağıran R, Ünal A, Özeker E, İsfendiyaroğlu M (2005) Armut. ilıman iklim meyve türleri, yumuşak çekirdekli meyveler (Cilt-II). Ege University Press, Izmir. (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk B, Ozturk A (2018) Determination of fruit quality properties of loquat genotypes grown in Ordu province of Turkey. Int J Sci Technological Res 4(10):262–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Ercisli S, Kalkan F, Demir B (2009) Some chemical and physico-mechanical properties of pear cultivars. Afr J Biotechnol 8(4):687–693

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polat AA, Caliskan O (2006) Growth and fruit quality of some foreign loquat cultivars in the subtropical climate of the turkish Mediterranean region. J Am Pom 60:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat AA, Turunç P (2016) Bazı yenidünya çeşitlerinde meyve kalitesi üzerine taç yönünün etkileri. Bahçe 45(1):161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat AA, Caliskan O, Serce S, Saracoglu O, Kaya C, Özgen M (2010) Determining total phenolic content and total antioxidants capacity of loquat cultivars grown in Hatay. Pharmacogn Mag 6:5–21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Şenyurt M (2006) Ordu ili merkez ilçede yetişen yenidünya tiplerinin (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) seleksiyon yolu ile ıslahı üzerine araştırmalar. Master thesis, Ordu University, Ordu/Türkiye. (in Turkish)

  • Teobaldelli M, Rouphael Y, Fascella G, Cristofor V, Rivera CM, Basile B (2019) Developing an accurate and fast non-destructive single leaf area model for loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl) cultivars. Plants 8(230):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8070230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepe S, Koyuncu MA (2019) Farklı anaçların ‘Akko XIII’ yenidünya çeşidinde meyve kalitesi üzerine etkileri. Derim 36(2):135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toker R, Gölükcü M, Tokgöz H, Tepe S (2010) Ülkemizde yetiştiriciliği yapılan yenidünya (Eriobotrya japonica) çeşitlerinin bazı kalite parametrelerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Gıda 35(4):275–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah F, Min K, Khattak MK, Wahab S, Wahab N, Ameen M, Yang J (2018) Effects of different drying methods on some physical and chemical properties of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) fruits. Int J Fruit Sci 18(4):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UPOV (1998) International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of plants. Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) Press Release No. TG/ 159/3. Date: 01 April 1998. Geneva, Switzerland

  • Uzun M, Bostan SZ (2019) Sürmene ilçesinde (Trabzon) doğal olarak yetişen muşmula genotiplerinin (Mespilus germanica L.) seleksiyonu. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 9(2):604–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarılgaç T, Balcı MA, Uzun S, Balta MF (2017) Physical and some chemical characteristics of loquat genotypes selected in central district in Trabzon province. Iğdır Univ J Inst Sci Technol 7(1):11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSMS (2023) Turkish State Meteorological Service. https://tr.climate-data.org/asya/turkiye/samsun/atakum-53188. Accessed 15 Jan 2023

Download references

Funding

This research received funds from Ondokuz Mayis University, scientific research projects dept. (OMU-BAP) with the project number (PYO.ZRT.1904.20.003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Research conception and design, material preparation, controlling, and corrections were made by [AÖ]. Doing the research and data collection [OCK]. Data analysis and the first draft of the manuscript were written by [ZAF]. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ahmet Öztürk or Zaki Ahmad Faizi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öztürk, A., Kurnaz, O.C. & Faizi, Z.A. Morpho-chemical characterization of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) genotypes. Genet Resour Crop Evol 71, 93–106 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-023-01609-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-023-01609-5

Keywords

Navigation