Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization and taxonomical note about Thai Erianthus germplasm collection: the morphology, flowering phenology and biogeography among E. procerus and three types of E. arundinaceus

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Erianthus, one of the genus in Saccharum complex, is important genetic resources for sugarcane improvement. The morphology and flowering phenology of 108 accessions belonging to Erianthus procerus and three types of E. arundinaceus collected from throughout Thailand were compared. PCA analysis based on 22 characteristics clearly supported the separation of Type II and Type III of E. arundinaceus from E. procerus and Type I of E. arundinaceus according to their morphological characteristics, particularly their bud size, and the development of root primordia, which greatly affected axis I of the PCA analysis. E. procerus and Type I showed overlapping in many of their characteristics including their flowering periods. Flower characteristics such as rachis joint length, which were used for previous taxonomic classifications, were not available for the classification of the Thai samples because of the wide variation and overlapping among them. Most of these phenotype similarities and differences are considered to have developed convergently as a result of niche adaptation. Type II and III inhabit riverbanks and streambeds where floods occur frequently, while E. procerus and Type I mainly grow in non-flooding areas such as mountainous grassland, the edge of forests, and beside fields. All Thai Erianthus show unique geographic distributions in Thailand. In particular, the biogeographic boundary between Type II and Type III appeared to be located at the Isthmus of Kra. Although some types showed morphological similarities, reproductive isolation among the four groups seemed to be maintained by differentiation in geographic distribution, habitat preference, and flowering timing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amalraj VA, Balasundaram N (2006) On the taxonomy of the members of ‘Saccharum complex’. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amalraj VA, Suganya A, Jebadhas AW (2005) Flowering and floral biological studies in Erianthus Michx. Sugar Cane Inter 23:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Arro JA, Veremis JC, Kimbeng CA, Botanga C (2006) Genetic diversity and relationships revealed by AFLP markers among Saccharum spontaneum and related species and Genera. J Am Soc Sugar Cane Technol 26:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker WJ, Coode MJE, Dransfield J, Dransfield S, Harley MM, Hoffmann P, Johns RH (1998) Patterns of distribution of Malesian vascular plants. In: Hall R, Holloway JD (eds) Biogeography and geological evolution of SE Asia. Backbuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Besse P, McIntyre CL, Berding N (1996) Ribosomal DNA variations in Erianthus, a wild sugarcane relative (Andropogoneae-Saccharinae). Theor Appl Genet 92:733–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Besse P, McIntyre CL, Berding N (1997) Characterisation of Erianthus sect. Ripidium and Saccharum germplasm (Andropogoneae-Saccharinae) using RFLP markers. Euphytica 93:283–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bor NL (1940) Flora of Assam V. Government of Assam, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Q, Aitken KS, Fan YH, Piperidis G, Jackson P, McIntyre CL (2005) A preliminary assessment of the genetic relationship between Erianthus rockii and the ‘‘Saccharum complex’’ using microsatellite (SSR) and AFLP markers. Plant Sci 169:976–984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Phillips SM (2006) Saccharum Linnaeus. In: Wu Z, Raven PH (eds) Flora of China. Science Press/Missuri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing/St. Louis, pp 576–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Coto O, Cornide MT, Calvo D, Canales E, D’Hont A, de Prada F (2002) Genetic diversity among wild sugarcane germplasm from Laos revealed with markers. Euphytica 123:121–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels J, Roach BT (1987) Taxonomy and evolution. In: Heinz DJ (ed) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 7–84

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Hont A, Rao PS, Feldmann P, Grivet L, Islam-Faridi N, Taylor P, Glaszmann JC (1995) Identification and characterisation of sugarcane intergeneric hybrids, Saccharum officinarum × Erianthus arundinaceus, with molecular markers and DNA in situ hybridisation. Theor Appl Genet 91:320–326

  • Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassl CO (1972) Taxonomy of Saccharum relatives: Sclerostachya, Narenga and Erianthus. Proc Int Sugar Cane Technol 14:240–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatusima S (1975) Flora of the Ryukyus. Okinawa Biological Education and Research Society, Okinawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Lledó DM, Salamin N, Renvoize SA (2002) Phylogenetics of Miscanthus, Saccharum and related genera (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) based on DNA sequences from ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid trnL intron and trnL-F intergeneric spacers. J Plant Res 115:381–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hole RS (1911) On some Indian forest grasses and their oecology. Indian For Mem For Bot 1:1–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker JD (1896) Flora British India, vol 7, pp 121–126

  • Liao PC, Havanond S, Huang S (2007) Phylogeography of Ceriops tagal (Rhizophoraceae) in Southeast Asia: the land barrier of the Malay Peninsula has caused population differentiation between the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. Conserv Genet 8:89–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuguti A, Nishiwaki A, Sugimoto Y, Oyamada M (2004) Genetic difference between two types of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. Characterized by flowering phenology. Grassland Sci 50:9–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee SK (1958) Revision of the genus Erianthus. Lloydia 21:157–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair NV, Mary S (2006) RAPD analysis reveals the presence of mainland Indian and Indonesian forms of Erianthus arundinaceus (Retz.) Jeswiet in the Andaman–Nicobar Islands. Curr Sci 90:1118–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair NV, Praneetha M (2006) Cyto-morphological studies on three Erianthus arundinaceus (Retz.) Jeswiet accessions from the Andaman-Nicobar Island, India. Cytologia 71:107–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piperidis G, Christopher MJ, Carroll BJ, Berding N, D’Hont A (2000) Molecular contribution to selection of intergeneric hybrids between sugarcane and the wild species Erianthus arundinaceus. Genome 43:1033–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2007) A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna

  • Ram B, Sreenivasan TV, Sahi BK, Singh N (2001) Introgression of low temperature tolerance and red rot resistance from Erianthus in sugarcane. Euphytica 122:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridder-Numan JWA (1998) Historical biogeography of Spatholobus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) and allies in SE Asia. In: Hall R, Holloway JD (eds) Biogeography and geological evolution of SE Asia. Backbuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 259–277

  • Rott P, Mohamed IS, Klett P, Soupa D, de Saint-Albin A, Feldmann P, Letourmy P (1997) Resistance to leaf scald disease is associated with limited colonization of sugarcane and wild relatives by Xanthomonas albilineans. Phytophatology 87:1203–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvi A, Nair NV, Balasundaram N, Mohapatra T (2003) Evaluation of maize microsatellite markers for genetic diversity analysis and fingerprinting in sugarcane. Genome 46:394–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selvi A, Nair NV, Noyer JL, Singh NK, Balasundaram N, Bansal KC, Koundal KR, Mohapatra T (2006) AFLP analysis of the phenetic organization and genetic diversity in the sugarcane complex, Saccharum and Erianthus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:831–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto A, Ponragdee W, Sansayawichai T, Kawashima T, Thippayarugs S, Suriyaphan P, Matsuoka M, Lerdprasertrat K, Pramanee P (2002) Collecting and evaluating of wild relatives of sugarcane as breeding materials of new type sugarcane cultivars of cattle feed in Northeast Thailand. JIRCAS Working Rep 30:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvatti C (1978) Flora of Thailand. Royal Institute Thailand, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarup KP, Kalia SK, Kaul S, Dalal V, Hemaprabha G, Selvi A, Pandit A, Singh A, Gaikwad K, Sharma TR, Srivastava PS, Singh NK, Mohapatra T (2009) Informative genomic microsatellite markers for efficient genotyping applications in sugarcane. Theor Appl Genet 118:327–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CA, Harborne JB, Smith P (1974) The taxonomic significance of leaf flavonoids in Saccharum and related genera. Phytochemestry 13:1141–1149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YW, Long HS, Fang YH, Yao YG, Cai Q, Zhang YP (2002) Sequence variation of rbcL gene and evolution of Saccharum and relative species. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 24:29–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Suchirat Sakuanrungsirikul of the Khon Kaen Field Crops Research Center, Thailand, for providing useful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuichiro Tagane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tagane, S., Ponragdee, W., Sansayawichai, T. et al. Characterization and taxonomical note about Thai Erianthus germplasm collection: the morphology, flowering phenology and biogeography among E. procerus and three types of E. arundinaceus . Genet Resour Crop Evol 59, 769–781 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9717-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9717-2

Keywords

Navigation