Abstract
Two different approaches to gravitational perturbation theory appear to give two different answers for the properties of gravitational wave memory. We show that this contradiction is only apparent and the two approaches actually agree.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zeldovich, Y.A.B., Polnarev, A.G.: Sov. Astron. 18, 17 (1974)
Christodoulou, D.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1486 (1991)
Bieri, L., Garfinkle, D.: Phys. Rev. D 89, 084039 (2014)
Hughes, S., Flanagan, E.: New J. Phys. 7, 204 (2005)
Rácz, I.: arXiv:0912.0128
Bieri, L., Chen, P., Yau, S.-T.: Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 21 (2012)
Bieri, L., Garfinkle, D.: Annales Henri Poincaré 16, 801 (2015)
Acknowledgments
DG was supported by NSF Grant number PHY-1205202 to Oakland University. IR was supported by the European Union and the State of Hungary, co-financed by the European Social Fund in the framework of TÁMOP-4.2.4.A/2-11/1-2012-0001 “National Excellence Program.” This research was supported in part by Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. Research at Perimeter Institute is supported by the government of Canada through Industry Canada and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development & Innovation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garfinkle, D., Rácz, I. Resolving a gravitational wave memory paradox. Gen Relativ Gravit 47, 79 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-015-1924-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-015-1924-2