Abstract
The hole argument was developed by Einstein in 1913 while he was searching for a relativistic theory of gravitation. Einstein used the language of coordinate systems and coordinate invariance, rather than the language of manifolds and diffeomorphism invariance. He formulated the hole argument against covariant field equations and later found a way to avoid it using coordinate language. In this paper we shall use the invariant language of categories, manifolds and natural objects to give a coordinate-free description of the hole argument and a way of avoiding it. Finally we shall point out some important implications of further extensions of the hole argument to sets and relations for the problem of quantum gravity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kerner R., Barbosa A.L., Gal’tsov D.V. Topics in Born–Infeld Electrodynamics, hep-th/0108026 (2005)
Earman J., Norton J. (1997) What prince spacetime substantivalism? the hole story. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 38, 515–525
Einstein, A.: Die formale Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie, pp. 1030–1085 Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), Sitzungsberichte (1914)
Einstein, A.: Reltivity, the Special and General Theory, 15th edn. Translation by Robert W. Lawson, University of Sheffield. Crown Publishers Inc., New York (1952)
Hawking S.W., Ellis G. (1973) The Large Scale Structure of the Universe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hermann R. Gauge Fields and Cartan-Ehresmann Connections, Part A. Math Sci Press, Brookline (1975)
Hodges W. (1993) Model Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Geroch R. (2004) Gauge, Diffeomorphisms, Initial-Value Formulation, etc. The Einstein equations and the large scale behavior of gravitational fields, pp. 441–477. Birkhuser, Basel
Fisher, A.: The Theory of Superspace. In: Relativity: Proceedings of the Relativity Conference in the Midwest. Plenum Press, New York/London (1970)
Stachel, J., Iftime, M.: Fibered Manifolds, Natural Bundles, Structured Sets, G-Sets and all that: The Hole Story from Space Time to Elementary Particles, gr-qc/0505138 (2005)
Isenberg J., Marsden J.E. (1982) A slice theorem for the space of solutions of Einstein’s equations, Physics Report, vol 89, no 2. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 179–222
Klainerman S., Christodoulou D. (1993) The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Kolár I., Michor P., Slovák J. (1993) Natural Operations in Differential Geometry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Kamiński, W., Lewandowski, J., Bobieński, M.: Background independent quantizations: the scalar field I, gr-qc/0508091 (2005)
Stephani H. et al. (2003) Exact Solution of Einstein’s Field Equations 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
MacLane S. (1992) Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: a first introduction to topos theory. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Palais, R.: Notes on the slice theorem for the space of Riemannian metrics. Letter circulated in 1969 and notes written at Santa Cruz in 1975 (1970)
Sachs R.K., Wu H. (1977) General Relativity for Mathematicians. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Sardanashvily G., Zakharov O. (1991) Gauge Gravitation Theory. World Scientific, Singapore
Sorkin R.D. (2000) Indications of causal set cosmology Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39, 1731–1736
Stachel J. (1969) Specifying sources in general relativity. Phys. Rev. 180, 1256–1261
Stachel J. (1986) What a Physicist Can Learn From the Discovery of General Relativity. In: Remo Ruffini (ed). Proceedings of the Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1857–1862
Stachel, J.: Einstein’s Search for General Covariance, 1912–1915. In: Don Howard, John Stachel (eds.). Einstein and the History of General Relativity, Einstein Studies, vol. 1. Birkhäuser, Boston/Basel/Berlin (1989), pp. 63–100. Reprinted in Stachel, John, Einstein from B to Z, Boston/Basel/Berlin: Birkhäuser 2002, pp. 301–337
Stachel J. (1993) The Meaning of General Covariance: the Hole Story. In: John Earman, et al. (eds). Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds. University of Pittsburgh Press Pittsburgh/Universitätsverlag, Konstanz, pp. 129–160
Stachel J. (1994) Changes in the Concepts of Space and Time Brought about by Relativity. In: Carol C. Gould, Robert S. Cohen (eds). Artifacts, Representations, and Social Practice/Essays for Marx Wartofsky. Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London, pp. 141–162
Stachel J. New light on the Einstein–Hilbert priority question. J. Astrophys. Astron. 20, 91–101 (1999). Reprinted in Stachel, John, Einstein from B to Z. (see ref 23), pp. 353–364
Stachel, J.: The story of Newstein: or is gravity just another pretty force? In Renn, J., Schimmel, M. (eds.). The Genesis of General Relativity: Sources and Interpretations, vol. 4, Gravitation in the Twilight of Classical Physics: The Promise of Mathematics (Berlin, Springer 2006), pp. 1041–1078
Stachel J. (2004) Structural Realism and Contextual Individuality. In: Yemima Ben-Menahem, (ed). Hilary Putnam. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stachel J. (2006) Structure, individuality and quantum gravity. In: Rickles D., French S., Saatsi J. (eds) The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iftime, M., Stachel, J. The hole argument for covariant theories. Gen Relativ Gravit 38, 1241–1252 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-006-0303-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-006-0303-4