Abstract
The identification and quantification of disturbance of archaeological sites has been generally approached by visual inspection of optical aerial or satellite pictures. In this paper, we briefly summarize the state of the art of the traditionally satellite-based approaches for looting identification and propose a new automatic method for archaeological looting feature extraction approach (ALFEA). It is based on three steps: the enhancement using spatial autocorrelation, unsupervised classification, and segmentation. ALFEA has been applied to Google Earth images of two test areas, selected in desert environs in Syria (Dura Europos), and in Peru (Cahuachi-Nasca). The reliability of ALFEA was assessed through field surveys in Peru and visual inspection for the Syrian case study. Results from the evaluation procedure showed satisfactory performance from both of the two analysed test cases with a rate of success higher than 90%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AAS (2015) Ancient history, modern destruction: assessing the current status of Syria’s world heritage sites using high-resolution satellite imagery. https://www.aaas.org/page/ancient-history-modern-destruction-assessing-current-status-syria-s-world-heritage-sites-using. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
Abdulkarim M (2014) Directorate general of antiquities and museums annual report 2013. Ministry of Culture, Directorate General of Antiquities and Museums, Damascus
Agapiou A, Lysandrou V, Hadjimitsis DG (2017) Optical remote sensing potentials for looting detection. Geosciences 7(4):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7040098
Alva W (2001) The destruction, looting and traffic of the archaeological heritage of Peru. In: Brodie NJ, Doole J, Renfrew C (eds) Trade in illicit antiquities: the destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage. Cambridge McDonald Institute, Cambridge, pp 89–96
Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115
Anselin L (2018) A local indicator of multivariate spatial association: extending geary’s c. http://priede.bf.lu.lv/ftp/pub/TIS/datu_analiize/GeoDa/LA_multivariateGeary1.pdf. Access 17 May 2018
Batievski J, Velarde J (2006) The protection of cultural patrimony in Peru”. In: Hoffmann BT (ed) Art and cultural heritage: law, policy, and practice; Art and cultural heritage law, policy, and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 100–104
BBC (2016) The Syria: The story of the conflict. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-26116868. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
Bowen FW, Tofel BB, Parcak S, Granger R (2017) Algorithmic identification of looted archaeological sites from space. Frontiers in ICT. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00004
Bowman N (2008) Transnational crimes against culture: looting at archaeological sites and the ‘grey’ market in antiquities. J Contemp Crim Justice 24(3):225–242
Brodie NJ, Doole J, Renfrew C (2001) Trade in illicit antiquities: the destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage. McDonald Institute, Cambridge
Casana J (2015) Satellite imagery-based analysis of archaeological looting in Syria. Near Eastern Archaeol 8(3):142–152
Casana J, Panahipour M (2014) Satellite-based monitoring of looting and damage to archaeological sites in Syria. J Eastern Mediterranean Archaeol Heritage Stud 2(2):129–152
Cerra D, Pank S, Lysandrou V, Tian J (2016) Cultural Heritage Sites in Danger—Towards Automatic Damage Detection from Space. Remote Sensing 8:781. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090781
Contreras DA (2010) Huaqueros and remote sensing imagery: assessing looting damage in the Viru Valley. Peru. Antiquity 84(324):544–555
Contreras DA, Brodie N (2013) The utility of publicly-available satellite imagery for investigating looting of archaeological sites in Jordan. J. Field Archaeol. 35:101–114. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346910X12707320296838
Conversation (2016) Inside ISIS’ looted antiquities trade. http://theconversation.com/inside-isis-looted-antiquities-trade-59287. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
Cunliffe E (2012) Damage to the Soul: Damage to the soul: Syria’s Cultural Heritage in Conflict Global Heritage Fund. http://ghn.globalheritagefund.com/uploads/documents/document_2107.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
Cunliffe E, Pedersen W, Fiol M, Jellison T, Saslow C, Bjørgo E, Boccardi (2014) Satellite-based Damage Assessment to Cultural Heritage Sites in Syria. UNITAR/UNOSAT: http://www.unitar.org/unosat/chs-syria. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
Dirven LA (1999) The Palmyrenes of Dura-Europos: a study of religious interaction in Roman Syria. Brill, Leiden
Doering HU (1958) Bericht über archaologische Feldarbeiten in Perú. Ethnos 23(2–4):67–99
Figorito B, Tarantino E (2014) Semi-automatic detection of linear archaeological traces fromorthorectified aerial images. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 26(1):458–463
Geary RC (1954) The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping. The Incorporated Statistician 5(3):115–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986645.JSTOR2986645
Guo H (2016) Digital earth and future earth. Int J Dig Earth 9(1)
Hopkins C (1979) The discovery of Dura Europos. New Haven
Lasaponara R, Masini N (2010) Facing the archaeological looting in Peru by local spatial autocorrelation statistics of Very high resolution satellite imagery. In: Taniar D et al (eds) Proceedings of ICSSA, The 2010 international conference on computational science and its application (Fukuoka-Japan, March 23–26, 2010). Springer, Berlin, pp 261–269
Lasaponara R, Masini N (2016) Combating illegal excavations in Cahuachi: ancient problems and modern technologies. In: Lasaponara R, Masini N, Orefici G (eds) The Ancient Nasca world new insights from science and archaeology. Springer, Berlin, pp 605–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47052-8_25
Lasaponara R, Masini N (2017) Preserving the Past from Space: An Overview of Risk Estimation and Monitoring Tools. In: Masini N, Soldovieri F (eds) Sensing the past. From artifact to historical site. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50518-3_3
Lasaponara R, Danese M, Masini N (2012) Satellite-based monitoring of archaeological looting in Peru. In: Lasaponara R, Masini N (eds) Satellite remote sensing: a new tool for Archaeology. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8801-7_8. ISBN 978-90-481-8800-0
Lasaponara R, Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R (2014) Investigating archaeological looting using satellite images and GEORADAR: the experience in Lambayeque in North Peru. J Archaeol Sci 42:216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.032
Lasaponara R, Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R, Scardozzi G (2016) Towards an operative use of remote sensing for exploring the past using satellite data: The case study of Hierapolis (Turkey). Remote Sens Environ 174:148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.016
Looted Heritage (2016) Looted heritage monitoring the illicit antiquities trade. https://heritage.crowdmap.com/main. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
Orefici G (2012) Cahuachi. Capital Teocratica Nasca.” Lima: Universidad de San Martin de Porres
Parcak S (2007) Satellite remote sensing methods for monitoring archaeological tells in the Middle East. J Field Archaeol 32(1):65–81
Parcak S, Gathings D, Childs C, Mumford G, Cline E (2016) Satellite evidence of archaeological site looting in Egypt: 2002–2013. Antiquity 90:188–205. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2016.1
Proulx BB (2013) Archaeological site looting in global prespective. Nature, scope and frequency. American Journal of Archaeology 117:111–125
Quijano J, Takahashi K, Deqitte B (2012) Numerical and observational study of the dynamics of the Paracas Wind, associated with aeolian transport into the ocean off the coast of Ica. Presentation at LMI-DISCOH Conference, Lima, 29–30th March 2012
Silverman H (1993) Cahuachi in the Ancient Nasca World. University of Iowa Pres, Iowa City
Stone EC (2008) Patterns of looting in southern Iraq. Antiquity 82:125–138
Stone EC (2015) An Update on the Looting of Archaeological Sites in Iraq. Near Eastern Archaeology 78(3):178–186
Tapete D, Cigna F, Donoghue DNM (2016) ‘Looting marks’ in space-borne SAR imagery: Measuring rates of archaeological looting in Apamea (Syria) with TerraSAR-X Staring Spotlight. Remote Sens Environ 178:42–58
Tarantino E, Figorito B (2014) Steerable filtering in interactivetracing of archaeological linear features using digital true colour aerialimages. International Journal of Digital Earth 7(11):870–880
Thomas DC, Kidd FJ, Nikolovski S, Zipfel C (2008) The archaeological sites of Afghanistan in google Earth. AARGnews 37:22–30
UNESCO (1956) Recommendation on International Principles Applicable to Archaeological Excavations
UNESCO (1970) Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property
UNESCO (1972) General conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization meeting in Paris from 17 October to 21 November 1972, at its 17th session. http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/
UNITAR (2014) Satellite-based Damage Assessment to Cultural Heritage Sites in Syria. http://unosat.web.cern.ch/unosat/unitar/downloads/chs/Dura_Europos.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
United Nations Security Council (2015) Unanimously adopting resolution 2199, Security Council Condemns Trade with Al-Qaida Associated Groups, Threatens Further Targeted Sanctions. http://www.un.org/press/en/2015/sc11775.doc.htm. Accessed 26 Nov 2016
Van Ess M, Becker H, Fassbinder J, Kiefl R, Lingenfelder I, Schreier G, Zevenbergen A (2006) Detection of Looting Activities at Archaeological Sites in Iraq Using Ikonos Imagery. Angewandte Geoinformatik, Beiträge zum (18):668–678
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lasaponara, R., Masini, N. Space-Based Identification of Archaeological Illegal Excavations and a New Automatic Method for Looting Feature Extraction in Desert Areas. Surv Geophys 39, 1323–1346 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9480-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9480-4