Abstract
Inverse problems are inherently non-unique, and regularization is needed to obtain stable and reasonable solutions. The regularization adds information to the problem and determines which solution, out of the infinitely many, is obtained. In this paper, we review and discuss the case when a priori information exists in the form of either known structure or in the form of another inverse problem for a different property. The challenge is to include such information in the inversion process. To use existing known structure, we review the concept of model fusion, where we build a regularization functional that fuses the inverted model to a known one. The fusion is achieved by four different techniques. Joint inversion of two data sets is achieved by using iterative data fusion. The paper discusses four different methods for joint inversion. We discuss the use of correspondence maps or the petrophysics of the rocks, as well as structure. In particular, we suggest to further stabilize the well-known gradient cross product and suggest a new technique, Joint Total Variation, to solve the problem. The Joint Total Variation is a convex functional for joint inversion and, as such, has favorable optimization properties. We experiment with the techniques on the DC resistivity problem and the borehole tomography and show how model fusion and joint inversion can significantly improve over existing techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Throughout the paper we somewhat abuse the notations between continuous and discrete variables. The understanding of what type of variable should be clear from the context.
Recall that the level sets of a function m(x) are lines (in 2D) and surfaces (in 3D) that are defined implicitly by the equation m(x) = const.
Recall that the Hadamard product of a vector y with a vector z is defined as \((z \odot y)_{i} = z_{i} y_{i}\)
References
Archie G (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Petroleum Trans AIME 146:54–62
Ascher U (2010) Numerical methods for evolutionary PDE’s. SIAM, Philadelphia
Ascher U, Haber E, Haung H (2005) On effective methods for implicit piecewise smooth surface recovery. SIAM J Sci Comput 28:339–397
Barton PJ (1986) The relationship between seismic velocity and density in the continental crust a useful constraint? Geophys J R Astronom Soc 87:195–20
van den Berg E, Friedlander M (2010) Joint-sparse recovery from multiple measurements. IEEE Trans Info Theory 56(5):2516–2527
Cardiff M, Kitanidis PK (2009) Bayesian inversion for facies detection: An extensible level set framework. Water Resour Res 45(10). doi:10.1029/2008WR007675
De Stefano M, Andreasi FG, Re S, Virgilio M, Snyder F (2011) Multiple-domain, simultaneous joint inversion of geophysical data with application to subsalt imaging. Geophysics 76(3):R69–R80. doi:10.1190/1.3554652
Gallardo L (2007) Multiple cross-gradient joint inversion for geospectral imaging. Geophys Res Lett 34:L19301
Gallardo L, Fontes S, Meju M, Buonora MP, de Lugao P (2012) Robust geophysical integration through structure-coupled joint inversion and multispectral fusion of seismic reflection, magnetotelluric, magnetic and gravity images: example from Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. Geophysics 77:B237–B251
Gallardo LA, Meju MA (2003) Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2d inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data. Geophys Res Lett 30(13):1658–1664
Gallardo LA, Meju MA (2004) Joint two-dimensional dc resistivity and seismic traveltime inversion with cross-gradients constraints. J Geophys Res 109B:3311–3315
Gallardo LA, Meju MA (2011) Structure-coupled multiphysics imaging in geophysical sciences. Rev Geophys 49(1). doi:10.1029/2010RG000330
Golub G, Heath M, Wahba G (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21:215–223
Haber E, Modersitzki J (2006) Intensity gradient based registration and fusion of multi-modal images. In: Proceeding of MICCAI, pp 323–330
Haber E, Oldenburg D (1997) Joint inversion a structural approach. Inverse Prob 13:63–67
Haber E, Oldenburg D (2000) A GCV based methods for nonlinear inverse problem. Comput Geosci 4, n1
Hansen PC (1997) Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM, Philadelphia
Hu W, Abubakar A, Habashy TM (November-December 2009) Joint electromagnetic and seismic inversion using structural constraints. Geophysics 74(6):R99–R109
Jackson D (1979) The use of a priori data to resolve non-uniqueness in linear inversion. Geophys J R Astronom Soc 57:137–157
Jilinski P, Fontes S, Gallardo L (2010) Joint interpretation of maps using gradient directions, cross and dot-product values to determine correlations between bathymetric and gravity anomaly maps. SEG Expand Abstr 29:1226–1229
Jilinski P, Fontes S, Meju A (2012) Estimating optimum density for regional Bouguer reduction by morphological correlation of gravity and bathymetric maps: examples from offshore southeastern Brazil. Geo Marine Lett 1–7
Jones AG, Fishwick S, Evans RL, Team TS (2009) Correlation of lithospheric velocity and electrical conductivity for Southern Africa. In: 11th SAGA biennial technical meeting and exhibition, Swaziland 16–18 September, pp 428 – 434
Lelivre PG, Oldenburg DW (2009) A comprehensive study of including structural orientation information in geophysical inversions. Geophys J Int 178(2):623–637. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04188.x
Linde N, Tryggvason A, Peterson JE, Hubbard S (2008) Joint inversion of crosshole radar and seismic traveltimes acquired at the south oyster bacterial transport site. Geophysics 73(4):G29–G37. doi:10.1190/1.2937467
Modersitzki J (2009) FAIR: flexible algorithms for image registration. SIAM, Philadelphia
Moorkamp M, Jones A, Eaton D (2007) Joint inversion of teleseismic receiver functions and magnetotelluric data using a genetic algorithm: are seismic velocities and electrical conductivities compatible? Geophys Res Lett 34:L16311
Moorkamp M, Jones A, Fishwick S (2011) Joint inversion of receiver functions, surface wave dispersion and magnetotelluric data. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115:5–6
Nocedal J, Wright S (1999) Numerical optimization. Springer, New York
Parker RL (1994) Geophysical inverse theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Pidlisecky A, Knight R (2008) A rapid 2.5 forward modelling algorithm for electrical resistivity modelling. Comput Geosci 34(12):1645–1654
Pluim J, Maintz J, Viergever M (1999) Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:986–1004
Roux E, Moorkamp M, Jones A, Bischoff M, Endrun B, Levedev S, Meier T (2011) Joint inversion of long-period magnetotelluric data and surface-wave dispersion curves for anisotropic structure: application to data from Central Germany. Geophys Res Lett 38:5–6
Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation. Chapman and Hall, London
Tikhonov A, Arsenin V (1977) Methods for solving ill-posed problems. Wiley, New York
Tryggvason A, Linde N (2006) Local earthquake (le) tomography with joint inversion for p- and s-wave velocities using structural constraints. Geophys Res Lett L07303
Van Huffel S, Vandewalle J (1991) The total least squares problem: computational aspects and analysis. Frontiers in applied mathematics, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Viola PA (1995) Alignment by maximization of mutual information. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Vogel C (2001) Computational methods for inverse problem. SIAM, Philadelphia
Zhang J, Morgan FD (1996) Joint seismic and electrical tomography. In: Proceedings of EEGS symposium on applications of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems keystone, Colorado, pp 391–396
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Adam Pidlisecky for the 2D DC code Pidlisecky and Knight (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haber, E., Holtzman Gazit, M. Model Fusion and Joint Inversion. Surv Geophys 34, 675–695 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9232-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9232-4