Abstract
Weierstrass-type representations have been used extensively in surface theory to create surfaces with special curvature properties. In this paper we give a unified description of these representations in terms of classical transformation theory of \(\Omega \)-surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The Weierstrass–Enneper representation [36] is a fundamental tool in differential geometry for creating interesting examples of minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space. A similar representation was developed by Bryant [6], and later [35], for surfaces of constant mean curvature (CMC) \(H\equiv c\) in hyperbolic 3-space of constant sectional curvature \(-c^{2}\). Many other Weierstrass-type representations exist for various surface classes, for example:
maximal surfaces in Lorentz 3-space [26],
zero mean curvature surfaces in isotropic 3-space [33],
CMC surfaces \(H\equiv c\) in de Sitter 3-space of constant sectional curvature \(c^{2}\) [1],
flat surfaces in hyperbolic 3-space [21],
linear Weingarten surfaces of Bryant type in hyperbolic 3-space [22],
linear Weingarten surfaces of Bianchi type in de Sitter 3-space [2].
The ingredients for such representations are always the same: a meromorphic function and a holomorphic 1-form. Thus one might expect that these representations are related in some way. A unification of some of these representations was achieved in [3] under the umbrella of marginally trapped surfaces in Minkowski space.
On the other hand, geometric interpretations of these representations have been sought in various works. The classical Weierstrass–Enneper representation can be understood using the Christoffel transformation of isothermic surfaces [23]. The Umehara–Yamada perturbation [35] deforms minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space into CMC-1 surfaces in hyperbolic 3-space. This perturbation is given a Möbius geometric interpretation in [24] as the spectral deformation of isothermic surfaces, arising due to the integrable nature of this surface class (see, for example, [7, 15, 19]). A Laguerre geometric interpretation of this perturbation was studied in [28], extending this notion to a wider class of surfaces.
Motivated by an observation in [10], we seek to understand Weierstrass-type representations using transformations of \(\Omega \)-surfaces. In [16], using the Christoffel transformation for isothermic surfaces in Minkowski space, Demoulin develops a notion of dual surfaces for \(\Omega \)-surfaces, yielding a transformation for this surface class. We shall refer to this as the \(\Omega \)-dual transformation. We show that L-isothermic surfaces can be characterised as \(\Omega \)-surfaces admitting a special dual surface, akin to how minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space can be characterised as Christoffel transformations of their Gauss map. We then give an invariant explanation of all of the aforementioned Weierstrass-type representations as applications of the \(\Omega \)-dual transformation to a prescribed Gauss map.
2 \(\Omega \)-surfaces
Let \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) be a spacelike immersion. As defined in [14, 30] a smooth map \(x^{*}:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) is called a Christoffel dual of x if x and \(x^{*}\)
have parallel tangent planes,
induce the same conformal structure on \(T\Sigma \), and
induce opposite orientations on \(T\Sigma \).
It was shownFootnote 1 in [8] that these conditions can be encapsulated by
where \((dx\wedge dx^{*})\) is a symmetric 2-form defined by
and \(dx\curlywedge dx^{*}\) is a symmetric 2-form with values in \(\wedge ^{2}\underline{\mathbb {R}}^{3,1}\) (with \(\underline{\mathbb {R}}^{3,1}\) denoting the trivial bundle \(\Sigma \times \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\)) defined by
A surface which possesses a Christoffel dual is then said to be isothermic. By the symmetric nature of (1), \(x^{*}\) is itself isothermic with Christoffel dual x.
In Laguerre geometry, one uses isotropy projection to identify points in \(\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) with spheres (see for example [13]). Therefore a spacelike immersion \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) represents a congruence of spheres. Given a spacelike immersion \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\), we may write the normal bundle of x as \(dx(T\Sigma )^{\perp }=G\oplus \tilde{G}\), where G and \(\tilde{G}\) are null line subbundles of \(dx(T\Sigma )^{\perp }\). We call G and \(\tilde{G}\) the lightlike Gauss maps of x. We may then construct null affine line bundles \(L:=x+G\) and \(\tilde{L}:=x+\tilde{G}\) of \(\underline{\mathbb {R}}^{3,1}\). In Laguerre geometry, these represent the envelopes of the sphere congruence x (see for example [27]).
As classically defined by Demoulin [16,17,18], the envelopes of isothermic (spacelike) sphere congruences are called \(\Omega \)-surfaces. Therefore, \(\Omega \)-surfaces are the null affine line bundles L of \(\underline{\mathbb {R}}^{3,1}\), for which we may write \(L=x+G\) for some isothermic surface \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\). Given Christoffel dual maps x and \(x^{*}\), we say that envelopes L and \(L^{*}\) of x and \(x^{*}\), respectively, are \(\Omega \)-dual if L is parallelFootnote 2 to \(L^{*}\).
3 Marginally trapped surfaces
A spacelike immersion \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) is called marginally trapped if its mean curvature vector
is lightlike, where \(X,Y\in \Gamma T\Sigma \) is an orthonormal basis with respect to the induced metric of x and \((.)^{\perp }\) denotes projection onto the normal bundle of x. Given \(p\in \Sigma \), \(\mathbf H (p)\) is then lightlike if and only if \(\mathbf H (p)\in G(p)\) or \(\mathbf H (p)\in \tilde{G}(p)\), where G and \(\tilde{G}\) are the lightlike Gauss maps of x. We say that a marginally trapped surface x is regular if either \(\mathbf H (p)\in G(p)\) for all \(p\in \Sigma \) or \(\mathbf H (p)\in \tilde{G}(p)\) for all \(p\in \Sigma \), i.e., \(\mathbf H \in \Gamma G\) or \(\mathbf H \in \Gamma \tilde{G}\).
Assume now that the normal bundle of x is flat. Then there locally exists parallel sections \(g\in \Gamma G\) and \(\tilde{g}\in \Gamma \tilde{G}\) with \((g,\tilde{g})=-1\). Since g is parallel, we may write \(dg=dx\circ S\) for some \(S\in \Gamma {{\,\mathrm{End}\,}}(T\Sigma )\). Since (dx, dg) is symmetric, we have that S is symmetric with respect to the induced metric of x. Therefore, S admits a basis \(X,Y\in \Gamma T\Sigma \) of orthonormal (with respect to the induced metric of x) eigenvectors with respective eigenvalues \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \). Now the mean curvature vector field is given by
Thus, \(\mathbf H \in \Gamma G\) if and only if \(\alpha +\beta =0\), i.e., S is trace-free. On the other hand
Thus S is trace-free if and only if \(dx\curlywedge dg=0\).
If \(dx\curlywedge dg=0\) for some \(g\in \Gamma G\), then \((ddx,g) =- (dx\wedge dg)=0\). Thus, \(dx\curlywedge dg=0\) implies that x and g are Christoffel dual. We thus arrive at the following theorem:
Theorem 3.1
A spacelike immersion in Minkowski space is a regular marginally trapped surface with flat normal bundle if and only if it is Christoffel dual to a section of one of its lightlike Gauss maps.
Suppose that \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) is Christoffel dual to \(g\in \Gamma G\). By defining \(L:=x+G\), we see that L is \(\Omega \)-dual to \(L^{*}:=G\). Moreover, since x has the same induced conformal structure on \(T\Sigma \) as G, one identifies x as the middle sphere congruence of L, see [4, 29]. One deduces from [9] that such L are the envelopes of L-isothermic surfaces, that is, surfaces in Euclidean 3-space that admit curvature line coordinates which are conformal with respect to the third fundamental form. This characterisation gives an analogue of minimal surfaces being Christoffel dual to their Gauss map in Euclidean space:
Corollary 3.2
Envelopes of L-isothermic surfaces are the \(\Omega \)-surfaces that are \(\Omega \)-dual to their lightlike Gauss map.
Now, the condition \(dx\curlywedge dg =0\), implies thatFootnote 3\(\zeta := g\wedge dx\in \Omega ^{1}(G\wedge G^{\perp })\) is a closed 1-form. Moreover, since \(G\wedge G^{\perp }\) is an abelian subbundle of \(\wedge ^{2}\underline{\mathbb {R}}^{3,1}\), one has that \([\zeta \wedge \zeta ]=0\). Therefore, \(\{d+t\zeta \}_{t\in \mathbb {R}}\) is a 1-parameter family of flat metric connections. Let \(T_{t}:\Sigma \rightarrow O(3,1)\) be local orthogonal trivialising gauge transformations of \(d+t\zeta \), i.e.,
Such transformations are unique up to premultiplication by a constant endomorphism \(A\in O(3,1)\). Now \(T_{t}dx\in \Omega ^{1}(\underline{\mathbb {R}}^{3,1})\) is a closed 1-form:
since \(\zeta \wedge dx =-(dx\wedge dx) g = 0\). Thus we may integrate to obtain a new surface \(x_{t}:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) satisfying \(dx^{t} = T_{t}dx\). Define \(G_{t}:= T_{t}G\) and set \(g_{t}:=T_{t}g\). Then \(dg_{t} = T_{t}(d+t\zeta )g=T_{t}dg\), since \(\zeta g=0\), and one deduces that
Thus \(x^{t}\) is a marginally trapped surface and \(L_{t}:= x_{t}+G_{t}\) is the envelope of an L-isothermic surface. This is the T-transform of L-isothermic surfaces (see [28, 29]). Notice that we obtain a new closed 1-form
We therefore obtain local orthogonalising gauge transformations \(T^{t}_{s}:\Sigma \rightarrow O(3,1)\) of the 1-parameter family of flat connections \(\{d+s\zeta _{t}\}_{s\in \mathbb {R}}\). In [23, Section 5.5.9] the following property was shown for iterating these transformations:
This property will be useful for us in the following section.
4 Weierstrass-type representations
The ingredients for Weierstrass-type representations are:
A simply connected Riemann surface\(\Sigma \). Equivalently, \(\Sigma \) is a simply connected 2-dimensional manifold equipped with a conformal structure and an orientation.
A meromorphic function\(\phi :\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {C}\cup \{\infty \}\). Equivalently, since \(\mathbb {C}\cup \{\infty \} \cong S^{2}\cong \mathbb {P}(\mathcal {L})\), where \(\mathcal {L}\subset \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) denotes the lightcone, we can identify \(\phi \) with a smooth map \(G:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {P}(\mathcal {L})\). \(\phi \) being meromorphic is equivalent to G being an orientation preserving map whose induced conformal structure is weakly equivalent to the conformal structure on \(\Sigma \).
A holomorphic 1-form\(\omega \). Alternatively, one may prescribe a holomorphic quadratic differentialFootnote 4q. We then have the relation \(q=d\phi \, \omega + d\bar{\phi }\,\bar{\omega }\).
We make the assumptionFootnote 5 that \(\phi \) has no critical points, and thus G is an immersion. Now for any non-zero lift \(g\in \Gamma G\), we may write \(q = (dg,dg\circ Q)\) for some endomorphism \(Q\in \Gamma {{\,\mathrm{End}\,}}(T\Sigma )\). q is then a holomorphic quadratic differential if and only if
is a closed 1-form (see [12, 32]).
Explicitly, one may identify a meromorphic function \(\phi \) with the map \(G:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {P}(\mathcal {L})\) spanned by the lift
where \(\{e_{0},\ldots ,e_{3}\}\) is a pseudo-orthonormal basis for \(\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) with \(e_{0}\) timelike and \(e_{1},e_{2},e_{3}\) spacelike. The induced metric of g is \((dg,dg) = 4 d\phi d\bar{\phi }\). By defining
we have that \((dg,dg\circ Q) = d\phi \omega + d\bar{\phi }\bar{\omega } =q\). One then computes
Notice that given Weierstrass data \((\phi , \omega )\), the right hand side of (4) yields a closed 1-form with values in \(G\wedge G^{\perp }\), regardless of whether \(\phi \) has critical points or not.
4.1 Affine hyperplanes in \(\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\)
Let \(\mathfrak {p}\in \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) be a non-zero vector. Then hyperplanes with normal \(\mathfrak {p}\) are flat 3-dimensional affine spaces. Given a closed \(\zeta \in \Omega ^{1}(G\wedge G^{\perp })\) we have that \(\zeta \mathfrak {p}\in \Omega ^{1}(\underline{\mathbb {R}}^{3,1})\) is a closed 1-form and we may locally integrate it to obtain
Now \(d(x,\mathfrak {p})= -(\zeta \mathfrak {p},\mathfrak {p})=0\), since \(\zeta \) is skew-symmetric. Thus x takes values in an affine hyperplane with normal \(\mathfrak {p}\). If \(G(p)\perp \mathfrak {p}\) for some \(p\in \Sigma \) then \(d_{p}x\in G(p)\) and thus x does not immerse at p. Away from such points, we may write \(\zeta = g\wedge \lambda \), where \(g\in \Gamma G\) satisfies \((g,\mathfrak {p})=-1\) and \(\lambda \in \Omega ^{1}(G^{\perp })\). Then \(dx=-\zeta \mathfrak {p} = \lambda \, mod\, G\) implies that \(\zeta = g\wedge dx\) and the closedness of \(\zeta \) implies that \(dg\curlywedge dx=0\). Hence, \(L:=x+G\) is \(\Omega \)-dual to \(L^{*}:= G\) and x is marginally trapped. In fact, since \(\mathfrak {p}\) lies in \(dx(T\Sigma )^{\perp }\), one deduces that \(\mathbf H =0\). Hence, x has zero mean curvature. We thus have the following 3 cases:
- (i)
if \(\mathfrak {p}\) is timelike then x is a minimal surface in a Euclidean 3-space,
- (ii)
if \(\mathfrak {p}\) is spacelike then x is a maximal surface in a Lorentzian 3-space,
- (iii)
if \(\mathfrak {p}\) is lightlike then x has zero mean curvature in an isotropic 3-space.
In cases (i) and (ii) we obtain a unit (spacelike or timelike, respectively) normal of x by setting \(n:= g-\mathfrak {p} \in \Gamma \mathfrak {p}^{\perp }\).
By choosing \(\mathfrak {p}=e_{0}\), one deduces from (4) that
and we thus recover the Weierstrass–Enneper representation [36]. By choosing \(\mathfrak {p}=e_{3}\), we have that
recovering the representation of [26] for maximal surfaces in Minkowski 3-space. Choosing \(\mathfrak {p}= \frac{e_{0}+e_{3}}{2}\) we obtain the representation of [33] for zero mean curvature surfaces in isotropic 3-space:
In this case, x is the graph of a harmonic function.
Remark 4.1
In [28] it was shown that surfaces in Euclidean space that are simultaneously L-minimal and L-isothermic are those surfaces whose middle sphere congruence is one of the three cases above. On the other hand, a Weierstrass-type representation was developed for such surfaces in [34]. One can recover this representation by intersecting the envelopes L of the three cases above with appropriate affine Euclidean 3-spaces.
We summarise the results of this subsection in the following theorem:
Theorem 4.2
The Weierstrass-type representations for
minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space,
maximal surfaces in Lorentzian 3-space, and
zero mean curvature surfaces in isotropic space
can be viewed as certain applications of the \(\Omega \)-dual transformation to a prescribed lightlike Gauss map.
4.2 Quadrics in \(\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\)
Given a closed 1-form \(\zeta \in \Omega ^{1}(G\wedge G^{\perp })\) we have that \(\{d+t\zeta \}_{t\in \mathbb {R}}\) is a 1-parameter family of flat connections. Therefore, there locally exists parallel sections of these connections. Suppose that \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) satisfies
for someFootnote 6 non-zero \(m\in \mathbb {R}\). Then \(d(x,x) = -2m(\zeta x,x)=0\), since \(\zeta \) is skew-symmetric. Hence, (x, x) is constant. If \(x(p)\perp G(p)\) for some \(p\in \Sigma \), then \(d_{p}x\in G(p)\) and thus x does not immerse at p. Away from these points, we may write \(\zeta = g\wedge \lambda \) where \(g\in \Gamma G\) such that \((g,x)=-1\) and \(\lambda \in \Omega ^{1}(G^{\perp })\). Then the condition \(dx= -m\zeta x\) implies that \(\zeta = \frac{1}{m}g\wedge dx\). The closedness of \(\zeta \) then implies that \(dx\curlywedge dg=0\). Hence, \(L:=x+G\) is \(\Omega \)-dual to \(L^{*}=G\) and x is marginally trapped. From [25] we then obtain the following 3 cases:
- (i)
if \((x,x)=-c^{2}\) then x is a CMC-c surface in \(\mathbb {H}^{3}(-c^{2})\),
- (ii)
if \((x,x)=c^{2}\) then x is a CMC-c surface in \(\mathbb {S}^{2,1}(c^{2})\),
- (iii)
if \((x,x)=0\) then x is an intrinsically flat surface in \(\mathcal {L}\).
In cases (i) and (ii) G then has a geometric interpretation as the hyperbolic Gauss map of x. An important observation is that parallel sections x of \(d+m\zeta \) are given by \(x = T^{-1}_{m}\mathfrak {c}\), where \(\mathfrak {c}\in \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) and \(T_{m}\) is a local trivialising orthogonal gauge transformations of \(d+m\zeta \), i.e., \(T_{m}(d+m\zeta )T_{m}^{-1}=d\) (see Sect. 3).
The Hermitian model of \(\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) identifies points in \(\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\) with \(2\times 2\) Hermitian matrices via the isometry
where the metric on the space of Hermitian matrices is given by \((A,A)=-\det A\). Our basis vectors become
We identify \(SL(2,\mathbb {C})\) with the orthogonal group O(3, 1) by its action on Hermitian matrices
Skew-symmetric endomorphisms, i.e., elements of \(\mathfrak {o}(3,1)\), are then identified with elements of \(\mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\) via
In particular, the skew-symmetric endomorphisms \(e_{i}\wedge e_{j}\) are identified with \(e_{ij}\in \mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\), where
One then computes that \(\zeta \) from (4) is identified with
Since \(\xi \) is a closed 1-form, there exists \(F_{t}:\Sigma \rightarrow SL(2,\mathbb {C})\) so that
One quickly deduces that the orthogonal transformations identified with \(F_{t}\) are in fact local trivialising orthogonal gauge transformations \(T_{t}\) of \(d+t\zeta \). Thus parallel sections of \(d+m\zeta \) are given by \(F^{-1}_{m}\mathfrak {c}(F^{-1}_{m})^{*}\) for \(\mathfrak {c}\in \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\). Defining \(\Psi _{m} := F^{-1}_{m}\) we have that
Now, by setting \(\mathfrak {c} :=\frac{1}{2}((1-\mu )e_{0}+(1+\mu )e_{3})= \begin{pmatrix} 1 &{} \quad 0\\ 0&{} \quad -\mu \end{pmatrix}\) for \(\mu \in \mathbb {R}\) and
we obtain
CMC \(H\equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{-\mu }}\) surfaces in \(\mathbb {H}^{3}(\frac{1}{\mu })\) when \(\mu <0\);
CMC \(H\equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu }}\) surfaces in \(\mathbb {S}^{2,1}(\frac{1}{\mu })\) when \(\mu >0\);
intrinsically flat surfaces in \(\mathcal {L}\) when \(\mu =0\).
When \(\mu = -1\) we see that this coincides with the representation of CMC \(H\equiv 1\) in hyperbolic 3-space surfaces given in [31, Corollary 2.4] and when \(\mu =1\) this coincides with the representation of CMC \(H\equiv 1\) in de-Sitter 3-space given in [20, Theorem 1]. We have thus arrived at the following theorem:
Theorem 4.3
The Weierstrass-type representations for CMC-c surfaces in \(\mathbb {H}^{3}(-c^{2})\) and \(\mathbb {S}^{2,1}(c^{2})\) can be viewed as certain applications of the \(\Omega \)-dual transformation to a prescribed lightlike Gauss map.
4.3 The Umehara–Yamada perturbation
Suppose that x is a parallel section of \(d+m\zeta \) for some non-zero \(m\in \mathbb {R}\), and thus \(x= T^{-1}_{m}\mathfrak {c}\) for some non-zero \(\mathfrak {c}\in \mathbb {R}^{3,1}\). Then the T-transform \(x_{m}\) of x satisfies
Hence, from Sect. 4.1 we know that \(x_{m}\) is a zero mean curvature surface in an affine hyperplane of \(\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\). Therefore, we recover the result of [28] that the T-transform of L-isothermic surfaces perturbs the cases (i), (ii), (iii) of Sect. 4.2 into the cases (i), (ii), (iii) of Sect. 4.1, respectively. This generalises the Umehara–Yamada perturbation [35] and gives a Laguerre geometric analogue of its interpretation in [24].
We call \(G_{m}=T_{m}G\) the secondary Gauss map of x. Since \(G_{m}\) and G induce the same conformal structures on \(T\Sigma \), there exists a holomorphic function \(\psi \) such that
is a lift of \(G_{m}\). We then define a holomorphic 1-form \(\eta \) so that \(q = d\psi \eta + d\bar{\psi }\bar{\eta }\). The closed 1-form \(\zeta _{m}= Ad_{T_{m}}\zeta \) is then identified with
Now parallel sections x of \(d+m\zeta \) are of the form \(x=T^{-1}_{m}\mathfrak {c} = T^{m}_{-m}\mathfrak {c}\), using (2). \(T^{m}_{-m}\) satisfies \(dT^{m}_{-m}= -mT^{m}_{-m}\zeta _{m}\) and correspondingly \(\Psi _{m}= F^{-1}_{m}\) satisfies
This formulation shows that the representation (6) coincides with the representation of [35] when \(\mu =-1\) and with the representation of [1] when \(\mu =1\). The duality between (5) and (8) has been remarked upon in [5, 31].
4.4 Linear Weingarten surfaces of Bryant type
A surface \(x:\Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb {H}^{3}\) is a linear Weingarten surface of Bryant type if the mean curvature H and Gauss curvature K of x satisfy a relation
for some \(\mu \in \mathbb {R}\). A Weierstrass-type representation was developed for these surfaces in [22]. The middle sphere congruence of such surfaces is given by \(x^{M} = x-\frac{\mu +1}{2}\tilde{g}\), where \(\tilde{g}\in \Gamma G\) such that \((\tilde{g},x)=-1\). Three cases emergeFootnote 7:
if \(\mu <0\) then \(x^{M}\) is a CMC-\(\frac{1}{\sqrt{-\mu }}\) surface in \(\mathbb {H}^{3}(\frac{1}{\mu })\),
if \(\mu >0\) then \(x^{M}\) is CMC-\(\frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu }}\) surface in \(\mathbb {S}^{2,1}(\frac{1}{\mu })\),
if \(\mu =0\) then \(x^{M}\) is an intrinsically flat surface in \(\mathcal {L}\).
We thus have that
where \(\Psi _{m}:\Sigma \rightarrow SL(2,\mathbb {C})\) satisfies (8). Using the Hermitian model, the lift \(g_{m}\) from (7) of the secondary Gauss map is given by
Now, since \(\tilde{g}\in \Gamma G\) satisfies \((\tilde{g},x)=-1\) and \(T^{-1}_{m}g_{m}\in \Gamma G\),
ThusFootnote 8,
By setting \(H:= \Psi _{m}\begin{pmatrix} i\psi &{} \quad i\\ i &{} \quad 0\end{pmatrix}\) we have that
We deduce from (8) that
Hence, we have recovered the representation of [22]. Moreover, in the case that \(\mu =0\), we obtain the representation of [21] for flat surfaces in \(\mathbb {H}^{3}\) .
Linear Weingarten surfaces of Bianchi type, that is surfaces satisfying (9) in \(\mathbb {S}^{2,1}\), were shown to admit a Weierstrass-type representation in [2]. An analogous analysis can be performed for these surfaces as above. We thus arrive at the following theorem:
Theorem 4.4
The Weierstrass-type representations for linear Weingarten surfaces of Bryant and Bianchi type can be viewed as certain applications of the \(\Omega \)-dual transformation to a prescribed lightlike Gauss map.
Notes
In fact, it was shown using Clifford algebra that this relation can be expressed by the vanishing of a single wedge.
It is always possible to arrange L and \(L^{*}\) to be parallel, since the normal bundles of x and \(x^{*}\) are the same.
Throughout this paper we shall use the well-known identification \(\wedge ^{2}\mathbb {R}^{3,1}\cong \mathfrak {so}(3,1)\), via \((a\wedge b)v = (a,v)b-(b,v)a\).
That is, we may write \(q^{2,0} = h dz^{2}\) for some local holomorphic coordinate z on \(\Sigma \) and some holomorphic function h.
Since \(\phi \) is meromorphic, this excludes the case that G is constant and isolated points of \(\Sigma \) where G does not immerse.
The choice of m here amounts to a constant scaling of the Hopf differential. In many works this scaling is fixed by choosing m appropriately.
This analysis is analogous to that performed in [11, Section 4.6] for parallel families of linear Weingarten surfaces in hyperbolic space.
Note that in order for this expression to be well defined, one must assume that \(1-\mu |\psi |^{2}\) is nowhere zero. This coincides with the assumption of [22].
References
Aiyama, R., Akutagawa, K.: Kenmotsu–Bryant type representation formulas for constant mean curvature surfaces in \(\mathbb{H}^{3}(-c^{2})\) and \(\mathbb{S}^{3}_{1}(c^{2})\). Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 17, 49–75 (1998)
Aledo, J.A., Espinar, J.M.: A conformal representation for linear Weingarten surfaces in the de Sitter space. J. Geom. Phys. 57(8), 1669–1677 (2007)
Aledo, Juan A., Gálvez, José A., Mira, Pablo: Marginally trapped surfaces in \(\mathbb{L}^4\) and an extended Weierstrass–Bryant representation. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 28(4), 395–415 (2005)
Blaschke, W.: Vorlesungen über Differentialgeometrie III. Springer Grundlehren XXIX, Berlin (1929)
Bobenko, A., Pavlyukevich, T., Springborn, B.: Hyperbolic constant mean curvature one surfaces: spinor representation and trinoids in hypergeometric functions. Math. Z. 245(1), 63–91 (2003)
Bryant, R.: Surfaces of mean curvature one in hyperbolic space. Astérisque 154–155, 321–347 (1987)
Burstall, F., Hertrich-Jeromin, U., Pedit, F., Pinkall, U.: Curved flats and isothermic surfaces. Math. Z. 225(2), 199–209 (1997)
Burstall, F.E.: Isothermic surfaces: conformal geometry, Clifford algebras and integrable systems. In: Integrable systems, geometry, and topology, vol. 36 of AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, pp. 1–82. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2006)
Burstall, F.E., Hertrich-Jeromin, U., Pember, M., Rossman, W.: Polynomial conserved quantities of Lie applicable surfaces. Manuscripta Math. 158(3), 505–546 (2019)
Burstall, F.E., Hertrich-Jeromin, U., Rossman, W.: Lie geometry of linear Weingarten surfaces. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 350(7–8), 413–416 (2012)
Burstall, F.E., Hertrich-Jeromin, U., Rossman, W.: Discrete linear Weingarten surfaces. Nagoya Math. J. 231, 55–88 (2018)
Burstall, F.E., Santos, S.D.: Special isothermic surfaces of type \(d\). J. Lond. Math. Soc. 85(2), 571–591 (2012)
Cecil, T.E.: Lie sphere geometry. With applications to submanifolds, Universitext, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2008)
Christoffel, E.B.: Ueber einige allgemeine eigenschaften der minimumsflächen. Crelle’s J 67, 218–228 (1867)
Cieśliński, J., Goldstein, P., Sym, A.: Isothermic surfaces in \({ E}^3\) as soliton surfaces. Phys. Lett. A 205(1), 37–43 (1995)
Demoulin, A.: Sur les surfaces \(\Omega \). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 153, 927–929 (1911)
Demoulin, A.: Sur les surfaces \(R\) et les surfaces \(\Omega \). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 153, 590–593 (1911)
Demoulin, A.: Sur les surfaces \(R\) et les surfaces \(\Omega \). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 153, 705–707 (1911)
Ferus, D., Pedit, F.: Curved flats in symmetric spaces. Manuscripta Math. 91(4), 445–454 (1996)
Fujimori, S.: Spacelike mean curvature 1 surfaces of genus 1 with two ends in de Sitter 3-space. Kyushu J. Math. 61(1), 1–20 (2007)
Gálvez, J.A., Martínez, A., Milán, F.: Flat surfaces in the hyperbolic \(3\)-space. Math. Ann. 316(3), 419–435 (2000)
Gálvez, J.A., Martínez, A., Milán, F.: Complete linear Weingarten surfaces of Bryant type. A Plateau problem at infinity. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 356(9), 3405–3428 (2004)
Hertrich-Jeromin, U.: Introduction to Möbius differential geometry, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 300. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Hertrich-Jeromin, U., Musso, E., Nicolodi, L.: Möbius geometry of surfaces of constant mean curvature 1 in hyperbolic space. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 19, 185–205 (2001)
Honda, A., Izumiya, S.: The lightlike geometry of marginally trapped surfaces in Minkowski space-time. J. Geom. 106(1), 185–210 (2015)
Kobayashi, O.: Maximal surfaces in the \(3\)-dimensional Minkowski space \(L^{3}\). Tokyo J. Math. 6(2), 297–309 (1983)
Musso, E., Nicolodi, L.: The Bianchi–Darboux transform of \(L\)-isothermic surfaces. Int. J. Math. 11(7), 911–924 (2000)
Musso, E., Nicolodi, L.: Holomorphic differentials and Laguerre deformation of surfaces. Math. Z. 284(3–4), 1089–1110 (2016)
Musso, E., Nicolodi, L.: Surfaces in Laguerre Geometry. ArXiv e-prints (February 2018)
Palmer, B.: Isothermic surfaces and the Gauss map. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 104, 876–884 (1988)
Rossman, W., Umehara, M., Yamada, K.: Irreducible constant mean curvature \(1\) surfaces in hyperbolic space with positive genus. Tohoku Math. J. (2) 49(4), 449–484 (1997)
Santos, S.: Special isothermic surfaces. PhD thesis, University of Bath (2008)
Strubecker, K.: Differentialgeometrie des isotropen Raumes III: Flächentheorie. Math. Z. 48, 369–427 (1942)
Szereszewski, A.: L-isothermic and L-minimal surfaces. J. Phys. A 42(11), 115203–115217 (2009)
Umehara, M., Yamada, K.: A parametrization of the Weierstrass formulae and perturbation of complete minimal surfaces in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) into hyperbolic 3-space. J. Reine Angew. Math. 432, 93–116 (1992)
Weierstrass, K.T.: Untersuchungen über die Flächen, deren mittlere Krümmung überall gleich Null ist. Monatsber. Berliner Akad. 612–625 (1866)
Acknowledgements
Open access funding provided by Austrian Science Fund (FWF). The author would like to express his gratitude to F. Burstall, J. Cho, U. Hertrich-Jeromin, W. Rossman and M. Yasumoto for fruitful and pleasant conversations about this topic. This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the research Project P28427-N35 “Non-rigidity and symmetry breaking”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Pember, M. Weierstrass-type representations. Geom Dedicata 204, 299–309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10711-019-00456-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10711-019-00456-y
Keywords
- Minimal surfaces
- Constant mean curvature surfaces
- Weierstrass representation
- Bryant representation
- Omega-surfaces