Skip to main content
Log in

Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lek paradox states that maintaining genetic variation necessary for ‘indirect benefit’ models of female choice is difficult, and two interrelated solutions have been proposed. ‘Genic capture’ assumes condition-dependence of sexual traits, while genotype-by-environment interactions (GEIs) offer an additional way to maintain diversity. However, condition-dependence, particularly with GEIs, implies that environmental variation can blur the relationship between male displays and offspring fitness. These issues have been treated separately in the past. Here we combine them in a population genetic model, and show that predictions change not only in magnitude but also in direction when the timing of dispersal between environments relative to the life cycle is changed. GEIs can dramatically improve the evolution of costly female preferences, but also hamper it if much dispersal occurs between the life history stage where condition is determined and mating. This situation also arises if selection or mutation rates are too high. In general, our results highlight that when evaluating any mechanism promoted as a potential resolution of the lek paradox, it is not sufficient to focus on its effects on genetic variation. It also has to be assessed to what extent the proposed mechanism blurs the association between male attractiveness and offspring fitness; the net balance of these two effects can be positive or negative, and often strongly context-dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Byers JA, Waits L (2006) Good genes sexual selection in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:16343–16345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins RD, Jang Y, Reinhold K, Greenfield MD (1999) Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signalling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Heredity 83:644–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A (2006) Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr Biol 16:R755–R765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson-François AM, Kelly JK, Greenfield MD (2006) Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. J Evol Biol 19:532–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • David P, Björksten T, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2000) Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyes flies. Nature 406:186–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day T (2000) Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Evolution 54:715–730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellner S, Hairston NG (1994) Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic variation in a fluctuating environment. Am Nat 143:403–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie JH, Turelli M (1989) Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 10:253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD, Rodriguez RL (2004) Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim Behav 68:1461–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999) Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400:358–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hine E, Chenoweth SF, Blows MW (2004) Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Evolution 58:2754–2762

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes KA, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (2005) Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J Evol Biol 18:35–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Bussiere LF, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2004) What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol Evol 19:329–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jia FY, Greenfield MD, Collins RD (2000) Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction. Evolution 54:953–967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI (2002) The sexual selection continuum. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1331–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:43–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Jennions MD, Houde A (2007) Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1317–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:343–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström J, Kokko H (2002) Cohort effects and population dynamics. Ecol Lett 5:338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (2005) Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes. Evolution 59:1085–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills SC, Alatalo RV, Koskela E, Mappes J, Mappes T, Oksanen TA (2007) Signal reliability compromised by genotype by environment interaction is preserved by ontogenetic conflict. Evolution 61:1748–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski A, Iwasa Y, Nee S (1991) The evolution of costly mate preferences. 1. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422–1430

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx SR (2001) Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution 55:2401–2411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A (1999) Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53:1564–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Brommer JE, Gustafsson L (2006) Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441:84–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold K (2004) Modeling a version of the good-genes hypothesis: female choice of locally adapted males. Org Divers Evol 4:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez RL, Greenfield MD (2003) Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57:1304–1313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1415–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spichtig M, Kawecki TJ (2004) The maintenance (or not) of polygenic variation by soft selection in heterogeneous environments. Am Nat 164:70–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins JL, Radwan J, Kotiaho JS, Tregenza T (2004) Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19:323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turelli M, Barton NH (2004) Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: Pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and GxE interactions. Genetics 166:1053–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X-S (2006) The phenotypic variance within plastic traits under migration-mutation-selection balance. Evolution 60:1125–1136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editors of this issue for inviting us to write this paper, two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions, Michael Jennions for comments and coffee, Michael Greenfield and Jan Lindström for fruitful discussions, and the Academy of Finland for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Kokko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kokko, H., Heubel, K. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox. Genetica 132, 209–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9166-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9166-1

Keywords

Navigation