Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional disparities in social, environmental, and economic indicators among the Indian States

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a plethora of evidence examining state-wise disparities in India and across nations, using different indicators and dimensions. However, insufficient efforts have been made to address the level of development and disparities in socioeconomic and environmental aspects, which refers to the basic amenities needed for the development of an individual's living conditions in any society or nation. To do so, using the UNDP method to standardize the data, inter-state disparities in terms of social, environmental, and economic aspects, which comprise a broader aspect of human well-being, including access to education, health care, clean water and sanitation, energy use, environment, and standard of living has been studied. Subsequently, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimensions and assign weights to the component domains of four indices: social, environmental, economic, and composite development index (CDI) with 15 indicators. Furthermore, fractile classification was used to categorize the phases of development of the different states into four categories: high, high-middle, middle-low, and low. The social, environmental, economic, and CDI were used to map the spatial pattern of disparities in the context of society, environment, and economy using ArcGIS for the 29 states of India. The findings show that, in India, different states have the widest discrepancies among the four indices. According to the results, the states of central and eastern India are underdeveloped, which corresponds to a wide variance in the overall position. Kerala, Mizoram, Goa, Sikkim, and Delhi performed under the top five categories in the CDI. Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Arunachal Pradesh were the bottom five performers in CDI, accounting for 32.53% of the area and housing 39.96% of the total population who suffer greatly from poor access to social, environmental, and economic resources. These findings imply that in order to improve socioeconomic conditions and foster long-term growth in underdeveloped states, authorities should concentrate on ensuring that current policies are adequately implemented. This study is crucial because it is challenging to develop evidence-based policies without identifying regional heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Government open access sources, National Health Profile, 2019, NFHS-5, Economic Survey, 2020–21, India Meteorological Department, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Rainfall Statistics of India, 2019, etc.

Code availability

SPSS version 22 is used for analysis and we have permitted the use this software.

References

  • Aiyar, S. (2000). Growth theory and convergence across Indian states: a panel study. In T. Callen, P. Reynolds, & C. Towe (Eds.), India at the crossroads: Sustaining growth and reducing poverty. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Robles, G. (2017). Global multidimensional poverty index. OPHI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., & Bourguignon, F. (1982). The comparison of multi-dimensioned distributions of economic status. Review of Economic Studies, 49, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai, N. & Sachs, J.D. (1996). Trends in interstate inequalities of income in India. Discussion Papers, Harward Institute for international development, number 528.

  • Banerjee, S., & Ray, S. (1998). On construction of district development index in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(47/48), 3019–3026.

  • Baran, P. A. (1957). The Political Economy of Growth. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basel, S., Gopakumar, K. U., & Rao, R. P. (2020). Testing club convergence of economies by using a broad-based development index. Geo Journal, 86(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10198-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, B.B., & Sakthivel, S. (2003). Regional disparities in growth: a comparison of pre and post-reform period, Discussion Paper No. 73/2003, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi.

  • Birthal, P. S., Singh, H., & Kumar, S. (2011). Agriculture, economic growth and regional disparities in India. Journal of International Development, 23, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borts, G.H., & Stein, J.L. (1968). Regional growth and maturity in the United States: a study of regional structural change, in Needleman (1968), Regional analysis, Penguin Modern Economics. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES)98(III), 290–321

  • Bradshaw, Y. W. (1987). Urbanization and underdevelopment: A global study of modernization, urban bias, and economic dependency. American Sociological Review, 52, 224–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, P. A., & Sahay, R. (1996). Internal migration, centre-state grants and economic growth in the states of India. IMF Staff Papers, IMF, 43, 123–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadha, V., & Chadha, I. (2020). The imperative of social sector development for achieving the goal of inclusive growth in India: An analytical study. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 22(2), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-020-00102-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, P. (2009). Intra-regional inequality and the role of public policy: lessons learnt from Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, 44 (26&27), 274–281.

  • Chattopadhyay, B., & Raza, M. (1975). Regional development: Analytical framework and indicators. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 7, 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Khan, A., Daspattanayak, P., Chatterjee, S., & Hassan, M. I. (2016). Regional model for agricultural imbalances in West Bengal. India. Model Earth System and Environment, 2(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0107-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Das, M., & Barman, H. (2021). Access to basic amenities and services to urban households in West Bengal: Does its location and size of settlements matter? GeoJournal, 86(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10101-6.

  • Debroy B., & Bhandari, L. (2003). How are the States doing, 2002? Indicus for the Confederation of Indian Industry, New Delhi.

  • De La Fuente, A. (2002). Regional convergence in Spain: 1965–95. CEPR discussion paper 3137.

  • De Long, B. J. (1988). Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: A comment. American Economic Review, 78, 1155–1159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharmaratne, M. A., & Attygalle, M. D. T. (2018). Improving the statistical capacity index: A statistical approach. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 6(3), 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, R. H. (1994). Spatial dimension of acceleration of economic growth in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 29, 2303–2309.

    Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of development. The American Economic Review, 60, 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M.R., & Chakraborty, B. (2004) Human capital accumulation and endogenous growth in a dual economy. www.isid.ac.in/*planning/bc.pdf.

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis, New International Edition, 7a Edn. Pearson Higher.

  • Hembram, S., Mukherjee, S., & Haldar, S. K. (2020). Regional convergence of social and economic development in the districts of West Bengal, India: Do clubs exist? Does space matter? An empirical analysis using DLHS I-IV and NFHS IV data. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 22(1), 58–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., & Slottje, D. J. (1991). Cluster analysis for measuring welfare and quality of life across countries. Journal of Econometrics, 50, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(91)90093-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, N. S., & Sudarshan, P. (1982). A method of classifying regions from multivariate data. Economic & Political Weekly, 17, 2047–2052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaun-Ramon, V.H., & Rivera-Batiz, L.A. (1996). Regional growth in Maxico: 1970–93, IMF Working Paper, No. WP/96/92, August.

  • Jian, T., Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1996). Trends in regional inequality in China. China Economic Review, 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-951X(96)90017-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (1994). On the relevance of conditional convergence under diverging growth paths—The case of East and West German regions, 1955–1988. Department of Economics, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolm, S. C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, R. (2016). Regional disparity in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar: A disaggregated level analysis. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 18, 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-016-0022-y.

  • Kumari, R., & Raman, R. (2021). Regional disparities in healthcare services in Uttar Pradesh, India: A principal component analysis. GeoJournal, 87, 5027–5050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10542-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. Retrieved August 19, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581

  • Lewis, A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Available from: https://la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/368/368lewistable.pdf. [25 July 2020].

  • Lipton, M. (1977). Why poor people stay poor: A study of urban bias in world development, Australian National University Press, Canberra, 73:467. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/114902.

  • Lipton, M. (1984). Urban bias revisited. Journal of Development Studies, 20, 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388408421910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1998). The mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E. (1986). The measurement and decomposition of multi-dimensional inequality. Econometrica, 54, 991–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahakur, P. K., & Nayak, N. C. (2019). An investigation of interstate income disparities and regional convergence in Odisha. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 21, 288–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumder, S., Roy, S., Bose, A., & Chowdhury, I. R. (2022). Understanding regional disparities in healthcare quality and accessibility in West Bengal, India: A multivariate analysis. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 1–28 https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12607.

  • Malhotra, N.K. (2008). Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientaçao aplicada. 4a ediç˜ ao. Bookman Editora.

  • Marjit, S., Sasmal, R., & Sasmal, J. (2020). Composition of public expenditure and growth of per capita income in Indian states: A political perspective. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 22, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdiar, A., Mazumidar, K., & Chakrabarti, S. (1995). Patterns of inter- and intra-regional inequality: A socio-economic approach. Social Indicator Research, 34, 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. D. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. Gerald Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraj, R. A., & Varoudakis, V. M. A. (2000). Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian states. Journal of International Development, 12(1), 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayyar, G. (2008). Economic growth and regional inequality in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 9, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, A. (2021). Linkages between agriculture and nutrition in Bihar. Social Change, 51(2), 180–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patra, R. (2014). Agricultural development In Odisha: are the disparities growing? International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 2(3), 1–16.

  • Patnaik, S., & Chattopadhyay, R. N. (1975). Spatial variations in levels of development in Orissa. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 7, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, J. (1994). Convergence in per capita income and migration across the Swedish counties: 1906–1990. Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. W. (1973). Regional growth theory. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1986) Endogenous technological change. http://www.PaulRomer.net.

  • Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1987). The standard of living. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (2000). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N., Bhanadari, L., Chen, A., & Khare, A. (2003). Regional inequality in India: A fresh look. Economic & Political Weekly, 38(11), 1069–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. P. (2006). Rural non-farm employment in Uttar Pradesh: Determinants, dimensions and regional pattern. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(4), 871–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slottje, D. J. (1991). Measuring the quality of life across countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 684–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suryanarayana, M. H. (2009). Inter-state economic disparities: Karnataka and Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26 & 27), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/40279786.

  • Timberlake, M., & Kentor, J. (1983). Economic dependence, over urbanization and economic growth: A study of less developed countries. Sociological Quarterly, 24, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.K.—data analysis, data collection, tabulation, and analysis work. R.R.—Proof-reading, analysis work, result interpretation. R.K.P.—mapping of states in different indices.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reena Kumari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

This manuscript is not submitted to more than one journal, and this is original, not an expansion of previous work, and has not been published elsewhere in any form or language. Results are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation. We have followed editorial ethics and academic ethics in this manuscript. The authors have not used their own works which have published earlier. We have not used any unethical language in any part of the manuscript.

Consent to participate

We have used the scientific method of research without any field observation.

Consent for publication

We wanted to get it published in this journal. I declare that this manuscript is neither published nor communicated to any other journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, R., Raman, R. & Patel, R.K. Regional disparities in social, environmental, and economic indicators among the Indian States. GeoJournal 88, 4351–4371 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10868-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10868-9

Keywords

Navigation