Skip to main content
Log in

Using direct use values for economic valuation of wetland ecosystem services: a case of Songore wetland, Zimbabwe

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many rural households derive a variety of direct use goods and services from wetland ecosystems in many countries, and as such wetlands are their pillar to livelihoods. The contribution of wetlands to economic wellbeing of society at household, community level and national level is however not well understood. The aim of this study was to use the direct use value method for identifying and quantifying goods obtained from wetlands and determining their contribution to total household income. Primary data was collected through field studies and questionnaires from Songore, Gombera and Musami villages which surround Songore wetland in Murehwa district, Zimbabwe. Two indicators were used to value the wetland resources which are the Gross Financial Value (GFV) and the Wetland Income (WI) from the collected data. Research findings have revealed that the annual economic value of Songore wetland was estimated to be $142 431.17 (GFV) and the annual cash income was $20 848.31 (WI). The results showed that annually wetland resources contributed about 50% to total household income and the incomes generated from quantities of goods harvested from the wetland varied across villages. Since the wetland has high economic value, it is important to set up institutions that facilitate the formation of Community Based Natural Resource Management programme to manage the wetland and resource use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adekola, O., Sylvie, M., Groot, R., & Grelot, F. (2006). The economic and livelihood value of provisioning services of the Ga-Mampa wetland, South Africa. Wageningen: Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen UR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A. (2002). Economic reason for conserving wild nature. Science,297, 950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (1993). Sustainable use of wetlands, valuing tropical benefits, economic methodologies and application. The Geographic Journal,159, 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (1997). Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. In Economic Policy (pp. 177–229). London Great Britain.

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research,6(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, W. (1999). Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of African rural households. The Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper Series, 105.

  • Chileshe, R. A. (2005). Land tenure and rural livelihoods in Zambia. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Western Cape, South Africa.

  • Collings, S. L. (2009). Economic consequences of ecological change; Restoration options for the Mfolozi flood plain and implications for Lake St. Lucia. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Management Agency. (2012). Annual report, Harare, Zimbabwe (p. 57).

  • Environmental Management Agency. (2015). Mashonaland East Province 2015 annual report, Marondera, Zimbabwe (p. 42).

  • Fisher, M. (2004). Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi. Environment and Development Economics,9(2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangalawe, R. Y., & Liwenga, E. T. (2005). Livelihoods in the wetlands of Kilombero Valley in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges to integrated water resource management. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C,30(11–16), 968–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiai, S., & Mailu, G. (1998). Wetland characterization and classification for sustainable agricultural development. FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Ed.), Rome, Italy (p. 402). Retrieved from, http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X6611E/x6611e02a.htm.

  • Kotze, D. & Breen, C. (1994). Agricultural land use impacts on wetland functional values. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, Report No. 501/3/94.

  • Lambert, A. (2003). Economic valuation of wetland: an important component of wetland management strategies at the River Basin Scale. Ramsar Convention.

  • Marambanyika, T., & Beckedahl, H. (2016a). Wetland utilization patterns in semi-arid communal areas of Zimbabwe between 1985 and 2013 and the associated benefits to livelihoods of the surrounding communities. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa,71(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marambanyika, T., & Beckedahl, H. (2016b). The missing link between awareness and the implementation of wetland policy and legislation in communal areas of Zimbabwe. Wetlands Ecology and Management,24(5), 545–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marambanyika, T., & Beckedahl, H. (2016c). Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe. Review of Social Sciences,2(1), 01–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marambanyika, T., Mutsiwegota, C., & Muringaniza, K. C. R. (2012). Importance of community participation in sustainable wetland utilization: Case of Chebvute Wetland in Zvishavane, Zimbabwe. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering (USA).,1(7), 832–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masiyandima, M., McCarteny, M., & Koppen, B. (2004). Sustainable development and management of wetlands: Wetlands contribution to livelihoods in Zambia. Rome: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matiza, T., & Crafter, S. A. (1994). Wetlands ecology and priorities for conservation in Zimbabwe. In Proceedings of a seminar on wetlands ecology and priorities for conservation in Zimbabwe, Harare Kentucky Airport Hotel, January 13–15, 1992 (Vol. 14). IUCN.

  • Mbereko, A., Chimbari, M. J., & Mukamuri, B. B. (2007). An analysis of institutions associated with wetlands use, access and management in communal areas of Zimbabwe: A case study of Zungwi vlei. Zvishavane, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C,32(15–18), 1291–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbereko, A., Mukamuri, B. B., & Chimbari, M. J. (2015). Exclusion and contests over wetlands used for farming in Zimbabwe: A case study of broad-ridge and broad-furrow tillage system on Zungwi Vlei. Journal of Political Ecology,21, 323.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney, M. P., & Koppen, B. V. (2014). Wetland contribution to livelihoods in united Republic of Tanzania, Netherlands Partnership Programme; Sustainable development and management of wetlands. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystems Assessment. (2005). Ecosystem and human wellbeing. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mmopelwa, G. (2006). Economic and financial analysis of harvesting and utilization of river reed in Okavango Delta, Botswana. Journal of Environmental Management,79(4), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutyavaviri, F. (2006). Impact of cultivation on Soil and species composition of the Monavale VlEI, Harare. M.Sc. Dissertation University of Zimbabwe.

  • Namaalwa, S., Funk, A., Ajie, G. S., & Kaggwa, R. C. (2013). A characterization of the drivers, pressures, ecosystem functions and services of Namatala wetland, Uganda. Environmental Science & Policy,34, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention Bureau. (2002). Cultural aspects of wetland. 8th Meeting of the conference of the contracting parties to the convention of wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) Vale.

  • Ramsar Convention Secretariat. (2006). Ramsar hand books for the wise use of wetlands. Gland: Conservation Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention Secretariat. (2010). Wise use of wetlands: Concept and approaches for the wise use of wetlands (4th ed.). Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russi, D., Ten Brink, P., Farmer, A., Badura, T., Coates, D., Forster, J., et al. (2013). The economics of ecosystem and biodiversity for water and wetlands. London: London IEEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., & Cousins, B. (1994). Struggle for control over wetland resources in Zimbabwe. Society & Natural Resources,7(6), 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thondhlana, G., Vedeld, P., & Shackleton, S. (2012). Natural resource use, income and dependence among San and Mier communities bordering Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Southern Kalahari, South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,19(5), 460–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpie, J. K., & Barnnes, J. I. (2003). Balancing ecology and economics in the multiple use of wetlands on communal land. In Proceedings of the 7th international Rangelands Congress, Durban, South Africa.

  • World Resources. (2005). Managing ecosystems to fight poverty, UNDP/UNEP/World Bank/WRI. Washington, DC: WRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuze, S. (2013). Measuring the economic value of wetland goods in Chihuta Malawi. M.Sc. Thesis University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe (p. 93).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Precious Mahlatini.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All ethical considerations were compiled with as consent was sought for interviewees while personal and sensitive information was not recorded. No external funding was provided for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahlatini, P., Hove, A., Maguma, L.F. et al. Using direct use values for economic valuation of wetland ecosystem services: a case of Songore wetland, Zimbabwe. GeoJournal 85, 41–51 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9947-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9947-3

Keywords

Navigation