Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do alternative spatial healthcare access measures tell the same story?

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To effectively target area and population with relatively poorer healthcare access requires information on how access to healthcare varies spatially. Considering hospitals as important components of the healthcare system, this case study of Central Missouri presents a comparison of the relatively underserved areas and population based on the results from three alternative indicators of spatial hospital access calculated at three different levels of geography. Results indicate that the alternative spatial healthcare access indicators show considerably different pictures of the relative ranking of census units, and identification of the relatively underserved areas and population. The relative ranking of census units and the identification of relatively underserved area and population are all critical indicators for policy makers when public resources are limited and distributive choices must be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the term relatively underserved area/population to indicate an area/population that has hospital access score worse than the population weighted regional average of the Central Missouri region. The underserved here is relative to regional averages and does not indicate the level of healthcare access actually received by people residing in a particular census geographic unit in an absolute sense.

  2. County level analysis (or county level indicators) indicates the use of travel time between county centroids and hospital locations in the calculation of the hospital access indicators. Tract level analysis and block group level analysis also should be interpreted in similar manner (i.e. use of tract and block group centroids in the calculation of travel time to hospitals). Tract and block group analysis together are sometimes referred to as sub-county level analysis in the text.

References

  • Arcury, T. A., Preisser, J. S., Gesler, W. M., & Powers, J. M. (2005). Access to transportation and health care utilization in a rural region. Journal of Rural Health, 21(1), 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P. J., Kudlac, H., & Williams, A. J. (1996). Geographical variation in the referral of patients with chronic end stage renal failure for renal replacement therapy. The Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 89(2), 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. A., & Menz, B. L. (1996). Selected comparisons and implications of a national rural and urban survey on health care access, demographic, and policy issues. Journal of Rural Health, 12(3), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guagliardo, M. F. (2004). Spatial accessibility of primary care: Concepts, methods and challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-3-3.

  • Guagliardo, M. F., Ronzio, C. R., Cheung, I., Chacko, E., & Joseph, J. G. (2004). Physician accessibility: An urban case study of pediatric providers. Health and Place, 10(3), 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guptill, S. C. (1975). The spatial availability of physicians. Proceedings of the association of American Geographers, 7, 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanvoravongchai, P., Chavez, I., Rudge, J. W., Touch, S., Putthasri, W., Chau, P. N., Phommasack, B., Singhasivanon, P., & Coker, R. (2012). An analysis of health system resources in relation to pandemic response capacity in the Greater Mekong Subregion. International Journal of Health Geographics. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-11-53.

  • Haynes, K. E., & Fotheringham, A. S. (1984). Gravity and spatial interaction models, Scientific Geography Series 2. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, D. I., Cornelius, S., & Carver, S. (1998). Introduction to geographical information systems. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, G. (2004). A literature review of the use of GIS-based measures of access to health care services. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 5(2), 199–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, A. E., & Bantock, P. R. (1982). Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: A method and case study. Social Science and Medicine, 16(1), 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. A. (1992). An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 26(4), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W. (2004). Using GIS-based floating catchment method to assess areas with a shortage of physicians. Health and Place, 10(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Wang, F., & Douglass, C. (2004). Temporal changes of access to primary health care in Illinois (1990–2000) and policy implications. Journal of Medical Systems, 28(3), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., & Wang, F. (2003). Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(6), 865–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Roderick, P., Diamond, I., Clements, S., & Stone, N. (1998). Geographical aspects of the uptake of renal replacement therapy in England. International Journal of Population Geography, 4(3), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Wrigley, H., Barnett, S., & Roderick, P. (2002). Increasing the sophistication of access measurement in a rural healthcare study. Health and Place, 8(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLafferty, S. L. (2003). GIS and health care. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 25–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.012902.141012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoon, J. G., McDonald, M., & Lee, A. (1999). Accessibility indices: pilot study and potential use in strategic planning. Transportation Research Record, 1685(9990606), pp. 29–38. doi:10.3141/1685-05.

  • Unal, E., Chen, S. E., & Waldorf, B. S. (2007). Spatial accessibility of health care in Indiana. Working paper #07-07, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.

  • Wang, F., & Luo, W. (2005). Assessing spatial and non-spatial factors for healthcare access: Towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health and Place, 11(2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. H., George, R., & Mullner, R. (2006). Comparing GIS-based methods of measuring spatial accessibility to health services. Journal of Medical Systems, 30(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Web references

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shriniwas Gautam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gautam, S., Li, Y. & Johnson, T.G. Do alternative spatial healthcare access measures tell the same story?. GeoJournal 79, 223–235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9483-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9483-0

Keywords

Navigation