Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The significance of quality of life and sustainability at the urban–rural fringe in the making of place-based community

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understandings of community in urban–rural fringe locations in Ireland are explored in this paper. As a specific space at the interface between the urban and the rural the fringe incorporates processes of rapid physical, social, and demographic change. These give rise to a range of complex and often competing dynamics, that impact on people and place in a variety of ways. Among the main preoccupations and concerns in these rapidly evolving fringe locations are those relating to what can broadly be described as ‘quality of life’. How this concept is understood across different groups situated within the spatial setting of the fringe, and how it influences the development of a sustainable community there, are central to this discussion. Drawing on household interviews from four case-study locations surrounding Galway City, Ireland, this paper examines how quality of life is experienced across a range of social and spatial dimensions that relate to these locations, and the extent to which they provide a common set of interests around which community may be built. From a wider knowledge perspective, it contributes to debates about how the concept of community provides explanatory power regarding the way in which individuals are associated with one another on the basis of a set of shared interests or concerns within a particular spatial setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton, H. (2002). Sustainable communities. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2002). The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. Media, Theory & Society, 19(1–2), 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (1999). Sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. (2005). Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales. Mainhead: Open University Press.

  • Brennan, M. (2007). Community development in the West of Ireland: Twenty years on in the Killala area. Community Development Journal, 42(3), 330–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G., Forrest, R., & Holland, E. (2004). Neighbouring: A review of the evidence. CNR Research Paper 24. London: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridger, J. C., & Luloff, A. E. (1999). Towards an interactional approach to sustainable community development. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(4), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage & closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Office (CSO). (2006). Census of Ireland 2006. Dublin: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, H., Nheu, N., & Vecellio, L. (2004). Sustainability as social change: Values and power in sustainability discourse. In H. Cheney, E. Katz, & F. Solomon (Eds.), Sustainability and social science: Roundtable proceedings (pp. 225–246). Melbourne: Institute for Sustainable Futures and CSIRO Minerals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, A., Farnsworth, K., & Zulaf, M. (2001) Social exclusion and inclusion: Partnerships for neighbourhood regeneration in London. Social Science Research Papers No. 15. London: South Bank University.

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M. P., Gray, J., & Peillon, M. (2007). Ties that bind? The social fabric of daily life in new suburbs. In T. Fahey, Helen. Russell, & Christopher. Whelan (Eds.), Best of times? The social impact of the Celtic Tiger. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. (1985). Rating places: A geographer’s view on quality of life. US: Association of American Geographical Research Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. R. (2002). Power, politics and networks: Shaping partnerships for sustainable communities. Area, 34(2), 190–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. K. D., & Herbert, D. T. (1993). Communities within cities: An urban social geography. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. (2006). Community and everyday life. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G., & Murdoch, J. (1993). Locality and community: Coming to terms with place. Sociological Review, 41(1), 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFilippis, J. (2001). The myth of social capital in community development. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 781–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B., Joas, M., Sundback, S., & Theolbald, K. (2005). Governing sustainable cities. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B., & Percy, S. (1999). The opportunities and challenges for local environmental policy and action in the UK. In S. Buckingham-Hatfield & S. Percy (Eds.), Constructing local environmental agendas (pp. 172–185). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, F., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (2008). The reality of the locality: Exploring spatial aspects of quality of life in Galway City, Ireland. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 3(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, I., & Kilpatrick, S. (2000). What is social capital? A study of interaction in a rural community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(1), 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy, 19(2), 141–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallent, N. (2007). Second homes, community and a hierarchy of dwelling. Area, 39(1), 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galway County Council. (2009). Galway city development plan review 2009. Galway: City Hall.

  • Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993) Basic writing. In D. Farrell Krell (Ed.). London: Routledge.

  • Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (2003). Introduction: Generating social capital. In M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 1–18). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, E. (2001). Indicators for sustainable development in urban areas. In D. Devuyst, L. Hens, & W. De Lannoy (Eds.), How green is the city? (pp. 275–298). USA: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyden, K. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighbourhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1546–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, M. (2007). New populations; shifting expectations: The changing experience of Irish rural space and place. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(3), 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, M., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (2009). Governance deficits in residential housing estates in Ireland. Urban Studies, 46(1), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and urban governance: adding a more contextualized ‘top-down’ perspective. Political Studies, 48(2), 802–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1993). Questions of locality. Geography, 78(2), 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Jess, P. (2003). A place in the world?. Oxford: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meegan, R., & Mitchell, A. (2001). ‘It’s not community around here, it’s neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2167–2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, L. (2002). Ethics of consumption. In T. Jackson (Ed.), The Earthscan reader in sustainable consumption. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, L. (2007). Negotiating boundaries or drawing the line? Transcending ‘insider/outsider’ distinctions in Connemara. Irish Journal of Sociology, 16(2), 136–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormont, M. (1990). Who is rural? Or, how to be rural: Towards a sociology of the rural. In T. Marsden, P. Lowe, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Rural restructuring: Global processes and their responses (pp. 21–44). London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, G. (2009) Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person–environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. (2007). Cosmopolitan versus the locals: Community-based protest in the age of globalisation. Irish Journal of Sociology, 16(2), 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Cearbhaill, D., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (1986). Community development in the West of Ireland: A case study of the Killala area. Community Development Journal, 12(3), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civil traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science, 28(4), 664–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseland, M. (2000). Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic, and social objective. Progress in Planning, 54(2), 73–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roudometof, V. (2005). Transnationalism, cosmopolitanism and glocalization. Current Sociology, 53(1), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (2006). Strategic spatial planning and contested ruralities: Insights from the Republic of Ireland. European Planning Studies, 14(6), 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seasons, M. (2005). Indicators and core area planning. In R. Phillips (Ed.), Community indicators measuring systems (pp. 96–115). UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorthall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(4), 450–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (2003). The sources of social capital. In M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 19–42). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Trust, democracy and governance. In M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 171–190). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam, F., Heins, S., & Elbersen, B. S. (2002). Lay discourses of the rural and state and revealed preferences for rural living. Some evidence of the existence of a rural idyll in the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 18(4), 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voisey, H., Beurermann, C., Sverdrup, A. L., & O’Riordan, T. (1996). The political significance of Local Agenda 21: The early stages of some European experience. Local Environment, 1(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, S. B. (2000). Changing life in the towns of north Kildare. Irish Geography, 33(1), 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. F. (1999). The origins of social capital. In J. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. F. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 25–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., & Shiels, P. (2000). Acceleration into sprawl: Causes and potential policy responses. ESRI Quarterly Economic Commentary 37–62 (pp. 37–62). Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2006). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy revisited. In A. Bebbington, M. Woolcock, S. Guggenheim, & E. A. Olson (Eds.), The search for empowerment: Social capital as idea and practice at the World Bank (pp. 31–62). Bloomfield, USA: Kumarian Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziller, A. (2004). The community is not a place and why it matters–case study: Green Square. Urban Policy and Research, 22(4), 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Mahon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahon, M., Fahy, F. & Ó Cinnéide, M. The significance of quality of life and sustainability at the urban–rural fringe in the making of place-based community. GeoJournal 77, 265–278 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9331-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9331-4

Keywords

Navigation