Skip to main content
Log in

Fifty years of organisational change in container shipping: regional shift and the role of family firms

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spectacular growth has marked the industry initiated by Malcolm McLean with the sailing of the Ideal-X in 1956. While the growth of container shipping has been typically seen in terms of technological advances, increasing vessel capacity, traffic growth, financial performance and competitiveness, it has been shaped also by organisational transformations. This paper provides an overview of the major companies that make up the container shipping industry, tracing the rapid adoption of containerisation by American carriers to its diffusion to Europe and then Asia. While several carriers belong to business conglomerates, the most dynamic in recent years have been those that are those that possess a family structure. About 12 of the present top 20 carriers are largely family controlled, including 4 out of the top 5. Unlike other capital intensive industries, where the power has shifted towards corporate governance, the container shipping industry retains a strong individualistic entrepreneurial character. At a time when North American ownership in container shipping is no more, the spirit of innovation began 50 years ago by an American visionary is still evident in the entrepreneurial dynamism of many of the industry leaders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, P. M. (1998). Revitalizing Korea’s chaebols. Asian Survey, 38, 1018–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddow, M. (2000). Aggressive management style. Containerisation International, December, 42–43.

  • Beddow, M. (2007). Floored. Containerisation International, January, 34–35.

  • Boyes, J. (2000). Pressure cooker. Containerisation International, July, 45–47.

  • De Souza, G. A., Beresford, A. K. C., & Petit, S. J. (2003). Liner shipping companies and terminal operators: internationalisation or globalisation? Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5, 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P., Forsgren, M., & Malmberg, A. (1994). The local embeddedness of transnational corporations. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), Globalization, institutions, and regional development (pp. 23–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A. (1997). Country of origin effects in human resource management in multi-national companies. Human Resource Management Journal, 7, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossey, J. (2006). The Chang way. Containerisation International, May, 59–61.

  • Frémont, A. (2006). De la Compagnie Générale Transatlantique à la CMA-CGM: l’entrée de l’armement de lignes régulières français dans la logique de la mondialisation. Revue d’histoire maritime, 5, 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frémont, A. (2007). Global maritime networks: the case of Maersk. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. (1998). Concentration in liner shipping, its causes and importance for ports and shipping services in developing regions. Santiago: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, J. (1993). The world-wide web of Chinese business. The Harvard Business Review, March–April, 24–36.

  • Kim, E. M. (1996). The industrial organisation and growth of the chaebol. In G. G. Hamilton (Ed.), Asian business networks (pp. 231–251). Berlin and New York: DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Pearson, R. (1988). The expansion of the national fleet of the Republic of Korea on Taiwan, 1960–1985. Maritime Policy and Management, 15, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, M. (2006). The box. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. M. (1996). The rise of Evergreen and the fall of US lines. Maritime Policy and Management, 23, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., & Winkelmans, W. (2002). Consolidation and contestability in the European container handling industry. Maritime Policy and Management, 29, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olie, R. (2005). Integration processes in cross-border mergers: Lessons learned from Dutch–German mergers. In G. Stahl & M. E. Mendenhall (Eds.), Mergers and acquisitions (pp. 323–350). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, D. (2006). The globalisation of port business: An Asian perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hong Kong.

  • Panayides, P. M., & Gong, S. X. H. (2002). Consolidation, mergers, and acquisitions in the shipping industry. In C. T. Grammenos (Ed.), The handbook of maritime economics and business (pp. 598–620). London: LLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (2006). The new argonauts; Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, A., Wachter, H., & Walgenbach, P. (2006). The comparative institutional approach in human resource management in multinational companies. In M. Geppert & M. Mayer (Eds.), Global, national and local practices in multinational companies (pp. 17–37). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tur, G. (2007). L’armada de Jacques Saadé. La Tribune, 26 January, 41–42.

  • Utterback, J. M. (1996). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W-c., & Lin, G. C. S. (2003). Theorizing economic geographies of Asia. Economic Geography, 79(2), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Slack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slack, B., Frémont, A. Fifty years of organisational change in container shipping: regional shift and the role of family firms. GeoJournal 74, 23–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9212-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9212-2

Keywords

Navigation