Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Ontology-Based Approach to Personalized Situation-Aware Mobile Service Supply

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile devices such as personal digital assistants (PDAs) and mobile phones are in widespread use already today and converging to mobile smart phones. They enable users to access a wide range of services and information without guidance through their actual demands. Especially during mass events like the Olympic Games 2008 in Beijing—which was initially the context of our work—a large service space is expected to support all mobile visitors, being athletes, journalists, or spectators. Current approaches tackling such problems are location based, meaning that a user's location is central to service provision, and even context-aware, meaning that, beyond location, characteristics of a user's environment are taken into account. Such information obviously helps to deliver relevant information at the right time to the mobile users. Going one step further, a situation-aware system abstracts from the context dimensions by translating specific contexts into logical situations. Knowing the situation end users are in allows the system to better identify the information to be delivered to them and to choose the appropriate services with regard to their scope, which is referred to as service roaming. Even though many context frameworks have been introduced in the past few years, what is usually missing is the notion of characteristic features of contexts that are invariant during certain time intervals. This paper presents these concepts in the context of a platform development, namely FLAME2008, which is able to support its mobile users with personalized situation-aware services in push and pull mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexandria Digital Library Project. “ADL feature type thesaurus,” in http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gazetteer/FeatureTypes/, 2004.

  2. M.-A. Aufaure, S. Yu, S. Spaccapietra, and N. Cullot. “User profiles in location-based services: Make humans more nomadic and personalized,” in Proc. IASTED International Conference on Databases and Applications, ACTA Press, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beijing Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games. “Beijing olympic action plan,” in http://en.beijing-2008.org/76/29/column211612976.shtml.

  4. P. Borst. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse, Ph.D. Thesis. Twente University, 1997, in http://www.ub.utwente.nl/webdocs/inf/1/t0000004.pdf.

  5. J. Coutaz, J. Crowley, S. Dobson, and D. Garlan. “Context is key,” Communications of the ACM, Special Issue: The Disappearing Computer, 48(3):49–53, March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cycorp, Inc. “OpenCyc selected vocabulary and upper ontology,” in http://www.cyc.com/cycdoc/vocab/vocab-toc.html, 2002.

  7. S. Das, E.I. Chong, G. Eadon, and J. Srinivasan. “Supporting ontology-based semantic matching in RDBMS,” in Proc. 30th VLDB Conference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Deiters, T. Löffeler, and S. Pfennigschmidt. “The information logistics approach toward a user demand-driven information supply,” in D. Spinellis (Ed.), Cross-Media Service Delivery, Boston, 37–48, 2003.

  9. A. Dey. “Understanding and using context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Journal, Vol. 5(1):4–7, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. “Dublin core metadata element set, reference description,” Version 1.1, 12/2004, in http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.

  11. European Research Consortium for Mathematics and Informatics (ERCIM). “Special Theme: Applications and Service Platforms for the Mobile User,” ERCIM News No.54, 2003.

  12. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. “TS 100 521 V7.0.0. Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Network functions”. (GSM 03.01 version 7.0.0 Release 1998), 1999.

  13. J. Fink and A. Kobsa. “User modeling in personalized city tours,” Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 18(1):33–74, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Fonseca, M. Egenhofer, C. Davis, and K. Borges. “Ontologies and Knowledge Sharing in Urban GIS,” Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 24(3):251–272, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Fu, A. Abdelmoty, and C. Jones. “Design of a Geographical Ontology,” SPIRIT deliverable D5 3101, 1/2003 in http://www.geo-spirit.org/.

  16. R. Gartmann. “Service roaming,” in Proc 1st GI/ITG KuVS Workshop on Location-based Applications and Services, Technical Report No. 317, Fernuniversität Hagen, 2004.

  17. R. Gartmann, B. Holtkamp, N. Weißenberg, and G. Li. “Service roaming in mobile applications,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Service Computing (SCC), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2005. Vol. 1, 121–128, July 2005.

  18. J.P. Getty Trust. “Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names,” http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabulary/tgn/, 2004.

  19. T. Gu, X.H. Wang, H.K. Pung, and D.Q. Zhang. “A middleware for context-aware mobile services,” in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VT)C, IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Guarino. “Formal ontology and information systems,” in Proc. FOIS'98, pp. 3–15, IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Haseloff. “Context gathering—an enabler for information logistics,” in P. Chamoni, P. Loos, W. Deiters, R.-D. Kutsche, K. Sandkuhl, N. Gronau, H. Müller-Merbach, and B. Rieger (Eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) 2004, Volume 2. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft: Berlin, 204–216, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Hiramatsu and F. Reitsma. “GeoReferencing the semantic web: Ontology-based markup of geographically referenced information,” in Joint EuroSDR/EuroGeographics Workshop on Ontologies and Schema Translation Services, Paris, France, April 2004, http://www.mindswap.org/2004/geo/geoOntologies.shtml, 2004.

  23. J. Hobbs and J. Pustejovsky. “Annotating and reasoning about time and events,” in P. Doherty, J. McCarthy, and M. Williams. (Eds), Working Papers of the 2003 AAAI Spring Symposium on Logical Formalization of Commonsense Reasoning. AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 74–82, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. Holtkamp, R. Gartmann and Y. Han. “FLAME2008—Personalized Web Services for the Olympic Games 2008 in Beijing,” in Proc. eChallenges, e-2003, 2003.

  25. ISO19115:2003. “Geographic information—Metadata,” ISO/TC 211, May 2003.

  26. ISO19119:2005. “Geographic information—Services,” ISO/TC 211, Feb. 2005.

  27. M. Kifer, G. Lausen, and J. Wu. “Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages,” Journal of the ACM, Vol. 42(4):741–843, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Kokkelink and R. Schwänzl. “Expressing qualified dublin core in RDF/XML,” in http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-rdf-xml, 2002.

  29. U. Meissen, S. Pfennigschmidt, A. Voisard, and T. Wahnfried. “Context- and situation-awareness in information logistics,” in Proc. of EDBT Workshop on Pervasive Information Management (PIM), Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 3268, Springer Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. I. Niles and A. Pease. “Towards a standard upper ontology,” Teknowledge corporation, in http://projects.teknowledge.com/HPKB/Publications/FOIS.pdf, 2001.

  31. OGC. “Gazetteer service profile of the web feature service implementation specification,” Open Geospatial Consortium, Document: 02-076r3, in http://www.opengeospatial.org/docs/02-076r3.pdf, Sep. 2002.

  32. Ontoprise GmbH. “How to write f-logic programs,” Ontoprise Tutorial Series, in http://www.ontoprise.com, Mar. 2005.

  33. Ontoprise GmbH. “White paper—ontobroker,” Ontoprise Tutorial Series, in http://www.ontoprise.com, Mar. 2005.

  34. OWL-S Coalition. “OWL-S: Semantic markup for web services,” W3C Member Submission, in http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S, Nov. 2004.

  35. OWL-S Coalition. “OWL-S 1.1 Release,” in http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/, 2005.

  36. J. Schiller and A. Voisard. Location-Based Services, Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Semantic Web Services Initiative: Semantic Web Services Ontology (SWSO), draft version 1.1, http://www.daml.org/services/swsf/1.1/swso/.

  38. SiGSIT home page. “Sino-German Joint Laboratory of Software Integration Technologies,” 2005, http://www.sigsit.org.

  39. S. Toivonen, J. Kolari, and T. Laakko. “Facilitating mobile users with contextualized content,” in Proc. Workshop Artificial Intelligence in Mobile System, 2003.

  40. E. Tomai and M. Kavouras. “Vagueness in geographic categories: A setback to semantic interoperability,” in Proc. 5th AGILE Conf. on Geographic Information Science, 2002.

  41. UDDI.Org. “UDDI Version 3.0 Specification,” Open Draft 2002, http://www.uddi.org/pubs/uddi_v3.htm.

  42. Versit Consortium. “VCard—the electronic business card, specification,” in http://www.imc.org/pdi/vcard-21.doc, Sep. 1996.

  43. W. Wahlster. “SmartWeb: Mobile applications of the semantic web,” in Proc. 27th Annual German Conference on AI, KI 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science No.3238, Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  44. N. Weißenberg and R. Gartmann. “Ontology architecture for semantic geo services for Olympia 2008,” in Proc. GI-Tage, 2003.

  45. N. Weißenberg, A. Voisard, and R. Gartmann. “Using ontologies in personalized mobile applications,” in D. Pfoser and I. Cruz (Eds.), Proc. of the Intl. ACM GIS Symposium, ACM Press: New York, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  46. World Wide Web Consortium. “OWL web ontology language reference,” in http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref, Mar. 2003.

  47. World Wide Web Consortium. “The platform for privacy preferences, specification,” W3C Recommendation, in http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P, April 2002.

  48. WSMO.Org. “Web service modeling ontology,” W3C Member Submission, in http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMO/, 6/2005.

  49. WSMO.Org. “A conceptual comparison between WSMO and OWL-S,” WSMO Working Draft, 1/2005 in http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d4/d4.1/v0.1/20050106/.

  50. V. M. Zurita. “Semantic-based approach to spatial data sources integration,” PhD Thesis, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, http://www.lsi.upc.es/events/sitsd/presentation/Cap1-2.web.pdf, 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer ISST, P.O. Box 52 01 30, 44207, Dortmund, Germany

    Norbert Weißenberg & Rüdiger Gartmann

  2. Fraunhofer ISST and FU Berlin, Mollstr. 1, 10178, Berlin, Germany

    Agnès Voisard

Authors
  1. Norbert Weißenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rüdiger Gartmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Agnès Voisard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Weißenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weißenberg, N., Gartmann, R. & Voisard, A. An Ontology-Based Approach to Personalized Situation-Aware Mobile Service Supply. Geoinformatica 10, 55–90 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-005-4886-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-005-4886-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation