Skip to main content
Log in

A Modified Engineering Classification Method for Schistose Surrounding Rocks of Tunnel

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For schistose surrounding rocks of tunnel, engineering classification of rock masses by the widely used BQ method in China are often inconsistent with the reality. In this study, microtests and uniaxial compression test were performed on three types of quartz mica schist. Microtests reveal that the schist is characterized by natural orientation and interbedded distribution of minerals and microfissures are prone to be distributed directionally along the smooth edge of flaky minerals. Mechanical test shows that the compressive strength of schist samples has U-shaped change with the varied loading direction. Moreover, the strength anisotropy degree of the schist is positively correlated with the development of schistosity planes, and the strength anisotropy increases significantly after saturation. When the direction of uniaxial load applied to the samples changes gradually, the splitting-tensile, shear-slip and shear failure occur respectively, indicating that the dominant factors affecting the strength of schist specimens are not uniform. In particular, the strength of specimens with transverse schistosity planes is less affected by the weak planes. Based on the experimental study, a new model considering the schistosity development degree was constructed, which is served as the evaluation of the basic quality of schistose rock mass. By regression analysis on 168 sets of practical data, an optimized BQ equation was further developed. Then a correction coefficient table was put forward based on numerical simulation, which is helpful to correctly determine the final engineering grade of surrounding rock. Case study shows that the improved BQ method is more reliable for classifying engineering grade of schistose surrounding rock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15(5):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano M, Tomas R (2013) Characterization of the instability mechanisms affecting slopes on carbonatic Flyach: Alicante (Se Spain), case study. Eng Geol 156:68–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho JW, Kim H, Jeon S, Min KB (2012) Deformation and strength anisotropy of Asan gneiss, Boryeong shale, and Yeoncheon schist. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 50:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun BS, Lee YJ, Seo DD et al (2006) Correlation of deformation modulus by PMT with RMR and rock mass condition. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 3(21):231–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Illinois Univ At Urbana Dept of Civil Engineering

  • Ding ZJ, Zheng J, Lv Q et al (2019) Discussion on calculation methods of quality index of slope engineering rock mass in standard for engineering classification of rock mass. Rock Soil Mech 40(Suppl 1):275–280 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong XS (1992) The standard for engineering classification of rock mass. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 9(4):1–9 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan SW, Xu XE (2013) Discussion of problems in calculation and application of rock mass integrity coefficient. J Eng Geol 21(4):548–553 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Naqa A, Ali A (2001) Application of RMR and Q geomechanical classification systems along the proposed Mujib Tunnel route, central Jordan. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60(4):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GB/T 50218-2014 (2015) Standard for engineering classification of rock masses. China Planning Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu DZ (1979) Basement of engineering geomechanics of rock mass. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CS, Gao B, Wang SC (2007) Preliminary classification method for rock mass surrounding karsts. J Eng Geol 14(6):808–814 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li SC, He P, Li LP et al (2018) Reliability analysis method of sub-classification of tunnel rock mass and its engineering application. Rock Soil Mech 39(3):967–976 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang QG, Li J, Li DW, Zhou YY (2011) Some problems on surrounding rock classification of loess tunnels. Chin J Geotech Eng 33(Suppl 1):170–176 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin YM (1999) Study of BQ formula in national standard of quantitative classification for basic quality of rock mass. Chin J Geotech Eng 21(4):481–485 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu FZ (1991) Basic quality and engineering classification of rock mass. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 26:55–63 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YR (2008) Rock mechanics. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasseri MHB, Rao KS, Ramamurthy TT (2003) Anisotropic strength and deformational behavior of Himalayan schists. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niandou H, Shao JF, Henry JP et al (1997) Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier HJ (1976) Importance of rock durability in the engineering classification of karoo rock masses for tunnelling. In: Proceedings of the symposium on exploration for rock engineering, Johannesburg, pp 137–144

  • Palmstroem A (2009) Combining the RMR, Q, and RMi classification systems. Tunn Undergr Space Technol Inc Trenchless Technol Res 24(4):491–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romana M (1991) SMR classification. In: 7th ISRM congress. international society for rock mechanics and rock engineering

  • Wang MH, Bai Y, Zhang DJ (2007) A study on rock mass structure feature and surrounding rock ranking for Xiluodu hydropower station. Rock Soil Mech 28(1):185–187 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham GE, Tiedemann HR (1974) Ground support prediction model (RSR concept) (No. JA-TR-125). Jacobs Associates Inc, San Francisco Ca

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham GE, Tiedemann HR, Skinner EH (1972) Support determinations based on geologic predictions. In: North American rapid excavation and tunneling conferenc, vol 1

  • Wu AQ, Liu FZ (2012) Advancement and application of the standard of engineering classification of rock masses. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(8):1513–1523 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu AQ, Wang B (2014) Engineering rock mass classification method based on rock mass quality index bq for rock slope. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(4):699–706 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu AQ, Jiang YZ, Shi AC et al (2018) Classification method for engineering rock mass containing primary implicit joint. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 35(12):74–82 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan CB, Wu WG, Wang GJ (2018) Quality classification of stratified composite rock mass with interlayer shear zones. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 89(1):62–73 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XL, Wang MS, Wang SR (2000) Blasting effects on basic quality of rock mass and its experimental investigations. Chin J Geotech Eng 22(4):461–464 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin XM (2017) The anisotropy of Wudang group schist and its application in tunnel support. PhD Thesis, China University of Geosciences (in Chinese)

  • Yin XM, Yan EC, Cui XJ et al (2017) Characteristic of strength anisotropy and failure modes of schist. J Eng Geol 25(4):943–952 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin XM, Yan EC, Wang LN et al (2020) Anisotropy of quartz mica schist based on quantitative extraction of fabric information. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79:2439–2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang XP, Ruan HT, Li P et al (2007) Status quo and trends analysis of factors considered in rock mass classification methods. Rock Soil Mech 28(10):2245–2248 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XP, Wong LNY, Wang SJ, Han GY (2012) Engineering properties of quartz mica schist. Eng Geol 121:135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZR, Yang YS, Zhao XY, Sheng Q, Zhu ZQ (2016) Empirical methods to determine the rock masses parameters. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 35(1):3195–3204 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by the Nanhu Scholars Program of Xinyang Normal University and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41807240). The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaomeng Yin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, X., Zhang, A. & Chen, L. A Modified Engineering Classification Method for Schistose Surrounding Rocks of Tunnel. Geotech Geol Eng 39, 377–395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01498-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01498-w

Keywords

Navigation