Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Soil Cement Bed in Improvement of Load Carrying Capacity of Stone Columns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reinforcing the soft clay with stone columns is one of the most accepted techniques for improving the ground. Use of stone columns increases the bearing capacity and reduces the compressibility of soft clayey soil. However, due to the application of the vertical load, the stone columns bulge and hence settlement occurs. To reduce the bulging and vertical settlement, a hard layer of soil–cement was placed over the stone columns as load transferring platform so that the layer transferred a reduced stress to the soft soil and stone column composite foundation. A series of laboratory experiments was conducted on single and a group of stone columns with and without the soil–cement bed. The effects of the thickness of the soil–cement bed, length of the stone columns and spacing between the stone columns were discussed. It was observed that due to the application of soil–cement bed, the bulging and vertical settlement of the stone column reduced noticeably and load carrying capacity increased appreciably. All the experimental results were compared with the numerical results obtained from ABAQUS-3D and a good correlation between the results was obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali K, Shahu JT, Sharma KG (2012) Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative study. Geosynth Int 19(4):292–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Alijani R, Issa S (2015) Experimental study on load-settlement behaviour of cement stabilised footing with different dimensions on sandy soil. Arab J Sci Eng 40:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1444-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambily AP, Gandhi SR (2007) Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(4):405–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreou P, Papadopoulos V (2014) Factors affecting the settlement estimation of stone column reinforced soils. Geotech Geol Eng 32(5):1175–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolou E, Brennan AJ, Wehr J (2018) Unreinforced concrete columns as countermeasure against liquefaction. 16th European conference on earthquake Thessaloniki engineering, 18–21 June.

  • ASTM (2006) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes: Unified Soil Classification System. ASTM standard D2487. ASTM International. West Conshohocken. Pa. 10.1520/D2487-06E01

  • Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone column. Report No.FHWA/RD-83/026. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia

  • Black JA, Sivakumar V, Madhav MR, Hamill GA (2007) Reinforced stone columns in weak deposits: laboratory model study. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:9(1154)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bora MC, Dash SK (2010) December. Load deformation behaviour of floating stone columns in soft clay. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference. pp 251–254

  • Bouassida M, De Buhan P, Dormieux L (1995) Bearing capacity of a foundation resting on a soil reinforced by a group of columns. Geotechnique 45(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles JE (1997) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham E (1974) On physically similar systems. Phys Rev APS 4:345–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro J (2017) Groups of encased stone columns: influence of column length and arrangement. Geotext Geomembr 45(2017):68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro J, Karstunen M (2010) Numerical simulations of stone column installation. Can. Geotech. J 47:1127–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Cengiz C, Guler E (2018) Seismic behavior of geosynthetic encased columns and ordinary stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 46(1):40–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JF, Wang XT, Xue JF, Zeng Y, Feng SZ (2018) Uniaxial compression behavior of geotextile encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 46(3):277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Choobbasti AJ, Zahmatkesh A, Noorzad R (2011) Performance of stone columns in soft clay: numerical evaluation. Geotech Geol Eng 29(5):675

    Google Scholar 

  • Chummer AV (1972) Bearing capacity theory from experimental results. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(12):1311–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Das M, Dey AK (2018a) Determination of bearing capacity of stone column with application of neuro-fuzzy system. KSCE J Civ Eng 22:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Das M, Dey AK (2018b) Prediction of bearing capacity of stone columns placed in soft clay using ANN model. Geotech Geol Eng 36(3):1845–1861

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, M, Dey AK (2018c) Prediction of bearing capacity of stone columns placed in soft clay using SVR model. Arab J Sci Eng, 1–11

  • Dash SK, Bora MC (2013) Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Geotext Geomembr 41(2013):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Samadhiya NK, Namdeo JB (2011) Laboratory model studies on unreinforced and geogrid-reinforced sand bed over stone column-improved soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 29(2011):190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath P, Dey AK (2017) Bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over encased stone columns in soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 45(6):653–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakher A, Jones CJFP (1996) Discussion of bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid reinforced sand, by Yetimoglu, T., Wu, J.T.H., Saglamer, A. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122(4):326–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah MY, Majeed QG (2012) Finite element analysis of geogrid encased stone columns. Geotech Geol Eng 30(4):713–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah MY, Zabar BS, Hassan HA (2016) Experimental analysis of embankment on ordinary and encased stone columns. Int J Geomech 16(4):04015102

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah MY, Al-Neami MA, Al-Suhaily AS (2017) Estimation of bearing capacity of floating group of stone columns. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(3):1166–1172

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazavi M, Afshar JN (2013) Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 38(2013):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazavi M, Yamchi AE, Afshar JN (2018) Bearing capacity of horizontally layered geosynthetic reinforced stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 46(3):312–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Gniel J, Bouazza A (2010) Construction of geogrid encased stone columns: a new proposal based on laboratory testing. Geotext Geomembr 28:108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DA, Kirsch K (1983) Specialist ground treatment by vibratory and dynamic methods – state of art. In: Advances in piling and ground treatment for foundations, Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England, pp 17–45

  • Horpibulsuk S, Miura N, Nagaraj TS (2003) Assessment of strength development in cement-admixed high water content clays with Abrams' law as a basis. Geotechnique 53(4):439–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Horpibulsuk S, Chinkulkijniwat A, Cholphatsorn A, Suebsuk J, Liu MD (2012) Consolidation behavior of soil–cement column improved ground. Comput Geotech 43(2012):37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JMO, Withers NJ (1974) Reinforcing of soft cohesive soils with stone columns. Ground Eng 7(3):42–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussein MG, Meguid MA (2016) A three-dimensional finite element approach for modeling biaxial geogrid with application to geogrid-reinforced soils. Geotext Geomembr 44(3):295–307

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 9214 (1979) Method of determination of modulus ofsubgrade reaction (K-Value) of soils in field. UDC 624.131.522, BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS, ManakBhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002.IS 10082. (1981): Method of test for the determination of tensile strength by indirect tests on rock specimens [CED 48: Rock Mechanics].

  • IS 10082 (1981): Method of test for the determination of tensile strength by indirect tests on rock specimens [CED 48: Rock Mechanics]

  • IS 1882-(1982): Indian Standard Method of Load Test on Soils

  • IS 2720-13 (1986) Methods of test for soils, Part 13: Direct shear test [CED 43: Soil and Foundation Engineering]

  • IS 2720-10. (1991) Methods of test for soils, Part 10: Determination of unconfined compressive strength [CED 43: Soil and Foundation Engineering]

  • IS 15284-Part 1 (2003) Design and construction for ground improvement-Guidelines. Part-1: Stone columns [CED 43: Soil and foundation engineering], ICS 93.020(2003)

  • Jenck O, Dias D, Kastner R (2005) Soft ground improvement by vertical rigid pilestwo-dimensional physical modelling and comparison with current design methods. Soils Found 45(6):15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenck O, Dias D, Kastner R (2007) Two-dimensional physical and numerical modeling of a pile supported earth platform over soft soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 133:295

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenck O, Dias D, Kastner R (2009) Three-dimensional numerical modeling of a pile embankment. Int J Geomech ASCE 9(3):102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keykhosropur L, Soroush A, Imam R (2012) 3D numerical analyses of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Geotext Geomembr 35(2012):61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Koolen AJ, Kuipers H (1983) Agricultural soil mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1979) Soil mechanics, SI version. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KM, Manjunath VR, Dewaikar DM (1999) Numerical and model studies of strip footing supported by a reinforced granular fill soft soil system. Can Geotech J 36(5):793–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Salgado R (2005) Estimation of bearing capacity of circular footings on sands based on cone penetration test. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(4):442–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo SR, Zhang R, Mak J (2010) Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: a numerical study. Geotext Geomembr 28(3):292–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Madun A, Jefferson I, Foo KY, Chapman DN, Culshaw MG, Atkins PR (2012) Characterization and quality control of stone columns using surface wave testing. Can Geotech J 49(12):1357–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani K, Nigee K (2013) A study on ground improvement using stone column technique. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol, 2

  • McKelvey D, Sivakumar V, Bell A, Graham J (2004) Modelling vibrated stone columns in soft clay. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 157(3):137–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrannia N, Nazariafshar J, Kalantary F (2018) Experimental investigation on the bearing capacity of stone columns with granular blankets. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda M, Da Costa A, Castro J, Sagaseta C (2015) Influence of gravel density in the behaviour of soft soils improved with stone columns. Can Geotech J 52(12):1968–1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Huber TR (1985) Performance of a stone column foundation. J GeotechEng ASCE 111(2):205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2006) Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical evaluation. Geotext Geomembr 24:349–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan S, Rajagopal K (2009) Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(1):129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • NAVFAC DM 7.2 (1984) Foundation and Earth Structures, U.S. Department of the Navy

  • Okyay US, Dias D (2010) Use of lime and cement treated soils as pile supported load transfer platform. Eng Geol 114(1–2):34–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju V R (1997) The behaviour of very soft soils improved by vibro replacement. Proc., Ground Improvement Conf, British Geotechnical Society. London, 253–259

  • Raju VR, Hari Krishna R, Wegner R Ground improvement using vibro replacement in Asia–1994 to 2004, a 10 year review. Proc., 5th Int. Conf. Ground Improvement Technology. CI-Premier. Malaysia

  • Rao L, Madhira M (2010) Evaluation of optimum spacing of stone columns. Indian Geotechnical Conference-2010, GEOtrendz, December 16–18, 2010, IGS Mumbai Chapter, IIT Bombay

  • Roscoe KH, Schofield AN, Wroth CP (1958) On the yielding of soils. Geotechnique 8(1):22–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Selig ET, McKee KE (1961) Static and dynamic behaviour of small footings. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 87(6):29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahu JT, Reddy YR (2011) Clayey soil reinforced with stone column group: model tests and analyses. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(12):1265–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahu JT, Reddy YR (2014) Estimating long-term settlement of floating stone column Groups. Can Geotech J 51:770–781. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivashankar R, Babu MD, Nayak S, Manjunath R (2010) Stone columns with vertical circumferential nails: laboratory model study. Geotech Geol Eng 28(5):695–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Six V, Mroueh H, Shahrour I, Bouassida M (2012) Numerical analysis of elastoplastic behavior of stone column foundation. Geotech Geol Eng 30(4):813–825

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai P, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2017) Experimental simulation and mathematical modelling of clogging in stone column. Can Geotech J 55(3):427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan X, Zhao M (2018) Deformation and Failure Behavior of the Isolated Single Stone Column with and Without Geosynthetic Encasement. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on Asia Urban GeoEngineering (pp 547–559). Springer, Singapore

  • Timoshenko S, Woinowsky-Krieger S (1970) Theory of plates and shells, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill International Editions, Singapore. (ISBN 0-07-Y85820-9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Impe WF (1989) Soil improvement techniques and their evolution. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatramaiah C (ed) (1993) Geotechnical engineering. John Wiley Eastern, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood DM (1990) Soil behavior and critical state soil mechanics. Cambridge University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood DM, Hu W, Nash DFT (2000) Group effects in stone column foundation: model tests. Geotechnique 50(6):689–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin JH, Fang Z (2006) Physical modelling of consolidation behaviour of a compositefoundation consisting of a cement-mixed soil column and untreated softmarine clay. Geotechnique 56(1):63–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Institute of Technical Education and Resarch, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

    Manita Das

  2. Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam, India

    Ashim Kanti Dey

Authors
  1. Manita Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashim Kanti Dey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manita Das.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, M., Dey, A.K. Use of Soil Cement Bed in Improvement of Load Carrying Capacity of Stone Columns. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 6529–6550 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01453-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01453-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation