Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Water Retention Characteristics of Fly Ash–Bentonite Mix

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of sand–bentonite mixes as hydraulic barrier in municipal and hazardous landfills are established in the literature. Environmental awareness and stringent rules on river conservation has restricted the free availability of construction sand making it non-viable for massive geo-environmental projects such as waste containment. Following the same philosophy for which sand was used in bentonite, this study propose to replace the former with fly ash. Apart from being an alternate material to sand, this proposition would ensure mass utility of waste fly ash for environmentally advantageous waste containment project. For this purpose, it is important to study the unsaturated characteristics of fly ash–bentonite mix, which is not reported in the literature. This study explores the influence of fly ash properties and its classification on the water retention characteristics curve (WRCC) of fly ash–bentonite mixes. The extent of variability in WRCC attributed to different sources of fly ash were quantified to investigate whether there is a possibility of generalizing the unsaturated behavior of fly ash–bentonite mixes. In addition, the influence of bentonite water content on the WRCC of mixes were studied and compared with the previously published results in the literature. It was found that at high suction (> 105 kPa), all the WRCC of FA–B mixes merges together and is mainly dominated by the water retention of bentonite only. It was also established from this study that any types of fly ashes irrespective of its source can be used in this application if compacted at optimum moisture content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

G:

Specific gravity

kPa:

Kilopascal

w:

Gravimetric water content

wb :

Bentonite water content

ψm :

Matric suction

ψ:

Total suction

γd :

Dry unit weight

References

  • Abeele WV (1986) The influence of bentonite on the permeability of sandy silts. J Nucl Chem Waste Manag 6(1):8l–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Abhijit D, Sreedeep S (2015) Evaluation of measurement methodologies used for establishing water retention characteristic curve of fly ash. J Test Eval ASTM 43(5):1066–1077

    Google Scholar 

  • Agus SS, Schanz T, Fredlund DG (2010) Measurement of suction versus water content for bentonite-sand mixtures. Can Geotech J 47:583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM C618-05 (2005) Standard specification for coal ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolana for use in concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D422-63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4318–05 (2005) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D698-07 (2007) Standard test method for laboratory compaction characteristic of soil using standard effort (12400 ft-lb/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D854-06 (2006) Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Borana L, Yin JH, Singh DN, Shukla SK (2017) Influence of matric suction and counterface roughness on shearing behavior of completely decomposed granite soil and steel interface. Indian Geotech J Spr 47(2):150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalermyanont T, Arrykul S (2005) Compacted sand-bentonite mixtures for hydraulic containment liners. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 27(2):313–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WB, Liu K, Feng WQ, Borana L, Yin JH (2019) Influence of matric suction on nonlinear time-dependent compression behavior of a granular material. Acta Geotechnica. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Çokça E, Yilmaz Z (2004) Use of rubber bentonite added fly ash as a liner material. Waste Manag 24(2):153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowland JW, Leung BN (1991) A field trial of a bentonite landfill liner. Waste Manage Res 9(4):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund MD (1998) Unsaturated seepage modeling made easy: geospectrum geotechnical news. GEOSPEC, Sarawak

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredlund DG (2002) Use of the soil-water characteristics curve in the implementation of unsaturated soil mechanics. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on unsaturated soils, UNSAT 2002, vol. 3. Balkema, Recife, Brazil, pp 887–902

  • Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason MH, David ED, Gerald RE (1997) Calcium and sodium bentonite for hydraulic containment applications. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(5):438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heineck KS, Lemos RG, Flores JAA, Consoli NC (2010) Influence of particle morphology on the hydraulic behavior of coal ash and sand. Geotech Geol Eng 28(4):325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 2720: Part XL (1977) Methods of test for soils: Determination of free swell index of soils. Indian Standards Institute, New Delhi, pp 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar PBR, Sharma RS (2004) Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soils. J Geotech Geo-environ Eng ASCE 130(7):764–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam L, Fredlund DG, Barbour SL (1987) Transient seepage model for saturated-unsaturated soil systems: a geotechnical engineering approach. Can Geotech J 24(4):565–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong EC, Tripathy S, Rahardjo H (2003) Total suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a device using the chilled-mirror dew-point technique. Geotechnique 53(2):173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likos WJ, Lu N (2003) Automated humidity system for measuring total suction characteristics of clay. Geotech Test J ASTM 26(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaya C, Sreedeep S (2012) Critical evaluation of the drying water retention characteristics of a class F Indian fly ash. J Mater Civil Eng ASCE 24(4):451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam S, Gutierrez M, Diplas P, Petrie J, Wayllace JA, Lu N, Munoz JJ (2010) Comparison of testing techniques and models for establishing the SWCC of riverbank soils. Eng Geol 110(1–2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nhan CT, Graydon JW, Kirk DW (1996) Utilizing coal fly ash as landfill barrier material. Waste Manag 16(7):587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata N, Komine H (1993) Permeability changes of bentonite-sand mixture before and after swelling. In: Proceedings of the international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 357–362

  • Prashanth JP, Sivapullaiah PV, Sridharan A (2001) Pozzolanic fly ash as a hydraulic barrier in landfills. Eng Geol 60(1):245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley AM, Dineen K, Burland JB, Vaughan PR (2003) Soil matrix suction: some examples of its measurement and application in geotechnical engineering. Geotechnique 53(2):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sia AHI, Dixon N (2012) Numerical modelling of landfill lining system–waste interaction: implications of parameter variability. Geosynth Int 19(5):393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedeep S, Singh DN (2006) Methodology for determination of osmotic suction of soils. Geotech Geol Eng 24(5):1469–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VKS, Sreedeep S, Singh DN (2006) Laboratory investigations on extremely high suction measurements for fine-grained soil. Geotech Geol Eng 24(3):565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieu NTM, Fredlund MD, Huang VQ (2001) Seepage modeling in a saturated/unsaturated soil system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on the land and water resources, MLWR, October 20–22, Hanoi, Vietman

  • WP4 User’s Manual (2002) Decagon Devices, Inc., USA

  • Yeheyis MB, Shang JQ, Yanful EK (2010) Feasibility of using coal fly ash for mine waste containment. J Environ Eng ASCE 136(7):682–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younus MM, Sreedeep S (2012) Evaluation of bentonite-fly ash mix for its application in landfill liners. J Test Eval ASTM 40(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha F, Liu SUY, Cui K (2008) Behavior of expansive soils stabilized with fly ash. J Nat Hazards 47(3):509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Central Institute of Technology Kokrajhar, Kokrajhar, Assam, 783370, India

    Abhijit Deka

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India

    Sreedeep Sekharan

Authors
  1. Abhijit Deka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sreedeep Sekharan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhijit Deka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deka, A., Sekharan, S. Water Retention Characteristics of Fly Ash–Bentonite Mix. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 3245–3252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01220-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01220-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation