Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Classification of Limestone Rock Masses Using Laboratory and Field P-wave Velocity by ArcGIS Fuzzy Overlay (AFO) (Case Study: Five Dam Sites in Zagros Mountains, Western Iran)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, 18 seismic tomography profiles in limestone rock masses with a total length of 2450 meters were studied to find the relationship between P-wave velocity in field and laboratory (VPField and VPLab) and rock mass classifications (Q and Qsrm) in the Zagros mountains, western Iran. The results showed that the Q rock mass classification system and its modified system for sedimentary rock masses (Qsrm) were closely related to Vp parameters. In addition to the VPField, KP (VPField/VPLab) also showed a significant relationship with Q and Qsrm. The best multivariate equation between VPField and KP with Qsrm (R2 = 0.70) was more reliable and had less error than the best between VPField and KP with Q (R2 = 0.55). The reason for this was the status of the voids and some other rock mass properties such as bedding and structure of rock mass in calculating the Qsrm, which were neglected in calculating the Q index. Certainly, voids and many rock mass properties in the limestone were very effective in the amount of KP and VPField. Also, the development of models of ArcGIS fuzzy overlay (AFO) methods for prediction of Qsrm showed very interesting results because it was able to show stronger accuracy (R2 = 0.89). In order to check the accuracy and errors of the obtained models, “Error%”, “Mean Absolute Percentage Error”, “Mean Absolute Deviation” and “Root Mean Square Error” indicators were used which showed the high-efficiency of the AFO model in estimation the Qsrm. According to the results of this study, it was proposed: in the studied calcareous rock masses, Qsrm classification can be a suitable substitute for Q classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi M (2004) Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran and its preforland evaluation. Am J Sci 304:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez Grima M, Babuska R (1999) Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andy A, Bery Rosli S (2012) Correlation of seismic P-wave velocities with engineering parameters (N value and rock quality) for tropical environmental study. Int J Geosci 3:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1979) Classification of rocks and soils for engineering geological mapping. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 5:89–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1991) Geotechnical design. World Tunnelling, pp 410–416

  • Barton N (1995) The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses. In: Fujii T (ed) Proc. Int. ISRM Congr. on Rock Mech, Tokyo, Japan. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1023–1032

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2007a) Rock quality, seismic velocity, attenuation, and anisotropy. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 19–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2007) Future directions for rock mass classification and characterization—Towards a cross-disciplinary approach, Oslo, Norway

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. J Rock Mech Eng 6(4):189–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt J (2007) The Role of new technologies in environmental monitoring, fuzzy logic in GIS and remote sensing. Geologic 6:18–36

  • Bery A, Saad R (2012) Correlation of seismic P-wave velocities with engineering parameters (N value and rock quality) for tropical environmental study. Int J Geosci 3(4):749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS, Chapter 9, Fuzzy logic section with related tables and figures. Pergamon, New York, p 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao A, Dou L, Cai W, Gong S, Liu S, Jing G (2015) Case study of seismic hazard assessment in underground coal mining using passive tomography. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 78:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrozzo MT, Leucci T, Margiotta S, Mazzone F, Negri S (2008) Integrated geophysical and geological investigations applied to sedimentary rock mass characterization. Ann Geophys 51(1):191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha YH, Kang JS, Jo CH (2006) Application of linear-array microtremor surveys for rock mass classification in urban tunnel design. Explor Geophys 37(1):108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman N (1997) Exploring geographic information systems. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, p 250

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvishzadeh A (1991) Geology of Iran. Neda Publication, Tehran, pp 1–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU (1967) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. J Rock Mech Eng Geol 1:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan LF, Wang LJ, Wu ZJ (2018) Wave transmission across linearly jointed complex rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 112:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R, Goodwin P (2007) against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting. Interfaces 37:570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Yesilnacar E, Sonmez H, Kayabasi A (2004) A neuro-fuzzy model for modulus of deformation of jointed rock masses. J Comput Geotech 31(5):375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmati Nourani M, Taheri Moghadder M, Safari M (2017) Classification and assessment of rock mass parameters in Choghart iron mine using P-wave velocity. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9(2):318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iran Water and Power Resourced Development Co (2012) Final reports of rock geotechnical study of Dams in Zagros regtion, Tehran, Iran

  • Karimi H, Tavakkoli M (2007) Assessment of the appeared water origin in the water tunnel of power house of Seymarehdam, Ilam. J Eng Geol 2(1):23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Karkazi A, Hatzichristos T, Mavropoulos A, Emmanouilidou B, Elseoud A (2001) Landfill siting using GIS and fuzzy Logic. EPEM S.A. Department of holid and hazardous wastes, Greece; Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency; and Dept. of geography, National technical university of Athens, Greece

  • Koleini M (2012) Engineering geological assessment and rock mass characterization of the Asmari formation (Zagros range) as large dam foundation rocks in southwestern Iran. PhD. thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa

  • Krau F, Giese R, Alexandrakis C, Buske S (2014) Seismic travel-time and attenuation tomography to characterize the excavation damaged zone and the surrounding rock mass of a newly excavated ramp and chamber. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson VE, Golaz J, Cotton W (2002) Small-scale and mesoscale variability in cloudy boundary layers: joint probability density functions. J Atmos Sci 59:3519–3539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leucci G, Giorgi LD (2015) 2D and 3D seismic measurements to evaluate the collapse risk of an important prehistoric cave in soft carbonate rock. Open Geosci 7:84–94

  • Lewellen WS, Yoh S (1993) Binormal model of ensemble partial cloudiness. J Atmos Sci 50:1228–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell PW (1993) Seismic investigation for rock engineering. In: Hudson JA (ed) Comprehensive Rock Engineering, vol 3. Rock Testing and Site Characterization. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 619–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross TJ (1995) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 600

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1984) Making computer think like people. IEEE Spectr 8:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafirovski Z, Peševsk I, Papić J (2012) Methodology for extrapolation of rock mass deformability parameters in tunneling FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: architecture and Civil. Engineering 10(3):235–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Geology, Faculty of Earth Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

    Mehdi Kianpour, Seyed Mahmoud Fatemi Aghda & Mehdi Talkhablou

Authors
  1. Mehdi Kianpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyed Mahmoud Fatemi Aghda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehdi Talkhablou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mahmoud Fatemi Aghda.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kianpour, M., Fatemi Aghda, S.M. & Talkhablou, M. Classification of Limestone Rock Masses Using Laboratory and Field P-wave Velocity by ArcGIS Fuzzy Overlay (AFO) (Case Study: Five Dam Sites in Zagros Mountains, Western Iran). Geotech Geol Eng 38, 631–650 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01052-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01052-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation