Skip to main content
Log in

Supporting a Retained Gob-Side Entry Under Soft and Fractured Rock: Computer Simulations and a Practical Example

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses theoretical analysis, finite difference numerical simulations with FLAC3D software, and a field test to determine and demonstrate the most reasonable width for a retained gob-side entry and the most reasonable dimensions for filling bodies to support that entry under soft and fractured rock. The paper proposes a set of technical measures to maintain the retained roadway. These measures are a combination of: (1) enhancing the strength of the rock surrounding the roadway with coupled bolt–mesh–anchor supports during excavation; (2) reinforcing the roof support in the backfilled area with bolts and wire mesh before the gob-side entry is re-entered; and (3) using single hydraulic props followed by concrete and gangue as roadside backfill to support the gob-side entry roadway. For the particular case considered in this study, a field trial at the 1702 face in the Zhaoguan Coal Mine, China, has verified that the proposed measures are effective. The field test results indicate that deformation around the retained roadway driven under soft and fractured rock has been effectively controlled. The maximum roof to floor convergence was no more than 450 mm and the lateral deformation of the roadway’s sides was less than 300 mm, much less than the deformation at the unreinforced 1704 face in the same mine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao SG, Chen XZ, Yang HY et al (2016) Analysis on roadside control technology of gob-side entry retaining and applicable conditions. Coal Sci Technol 44(4):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang Q, Tang W, Ying X et al (2018) Research on the width of filling body in gob-side entry retaining with high-water materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 28:519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Bai JB, Zhu TL et al (2012) Mechanisms of roadside support in gob-side entry retaining and its application. Rock Soil Mech 33(5):1427–1432

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Ma Z, Zhang RR (2017) Surrounding rock deformation mechanism and control technology for gob-side entry retaining with fully mechanized gangue backfilling mining: a case study. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6085941

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo ZP, Mou WQ, Huang WP et al (2015) Analysis on roadside support method with constant resistance yielding-supporting along the goaf under hard rocks. Geotech Geol Eng 34:827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han CL, Zhang N, Wang XQ et al (2013) Bearing behavior of block wall structure in gob-side entry retaining and its application. J Min Saf Eng 30(5):673–678

    Google Scholar 

  • He M, Gao Y, Yang J et al (2017) An innovative approach for gob-side entry retaining in thick coal seam longwall mining. Energies 10(11):1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua X (2006) Development status and improved proposals on gob-side entry retaining support technology in China. Coal Sci Technol 34(12):78–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang HP, Niu DL, Zhang Z et al (2010) Deformation characteristics of surrounding rock and supporting technology of gob-side entry retaining in deep coal mine. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(10):1977–1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YF, Hua XZ (2012) Mechanical analysis of stability of key blocks of overlying strata for gob-side entry retaining and calculating width of roadside backfill. Rock Soil Mech 33(4):1134–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu K (2013) Rib control technology of gob-side entry retaining in high stress soft rock roadway. Coal Sci Technol 41(10):38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q, Tan Y, Zhao Z et al (2018) Roadside support schemes numerical simulation and field monitoring of gob-side entry retaining in soft floor and hard roof. Arab J Geosci 11:563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CD, Zhang DS, Wang XF et al (2012) Large-size test on creep characteristics of high water material for filling body beside roadway. J Min Saf Eng 29(4):487–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan YL, Yu FH, Ning JG et al (2015) Design and construction of entry retaining wall along a gob side under hard roof stratum. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 77:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan YL, Yu FH, Ning JG et al (2016) Adaptability theory of roadside support in gob-side entry retaining and its supporting design. J China Coal Soc 41(2):376–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XC (2014) Study on gob-side entry retaining without filling in soft rock roadway. Hydraul Coal Min Pipeline Transp 1(3):30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang HY, Cao SG, Li Y et al (2015) Soft roof failure mechanism and supporting method for gob-side entry retaining. Minerals 5(4):707–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JX, Jiang HQ, Miao XX et al (2013) The rational width of the support body of gob-side entry in fully mechanized backfill mining. J Min Saf Eng 30(2):159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Han CL, Kan JG et al (2014) Theory and practice of surrounding rock control for pillarless gob-side entry retaining. J China Coal Soc 39(8):1635–1641

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574156).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Deng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, L., Lv, J. & Chen, Y. Supporting a Retained Gob-Side Entry Under Soft and Fractured Rock: Computer Simulations and a Practical Example. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 2283–2292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0745-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0745-y

Keywords

Navigation