Abstract
In order to study the influence of different spacing and angles of the axes of the two tunnels on the deformation and operation safety of existing tunnel in near-tunnel construction, the project in Fuzhou is taken to analysis. We use the finite element analysis software to construct a three-dimensional finite element model and carry on the numerical simulation, obtaining vertical vault displacement curves under different spacing and angles of the axes of the two tunnels. Then, we compare it with the actual monitoring data and do further analysis, we get following conclusions: (1) the main performance of the existing tunnel deformation is upward, the deformation decreases with the increase of the spacing and crossing angle, and the effect of the spacing on the existing tunnel vault deformation is far greater than the crossing angle. (2) When the spacing is less than 1.5 times of the new tunnel hole diameter, the maximum tunnel vault deformation occurs in the tunnel cross surface; when the spacing is greater than 1.5 times of the new tunnel hole diameter, the maximum tunnel vault deformation gradually moves toward to the center of the existing tunnel. The research results can provide some references for the design and construction of similar projects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chehade FH, Shahrour I (2008) Numerical analysis of the interaction between twin-tunnels: influence of the relative position and construction procedure. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(2):210–214
Du JH, Song WD, Cong EW, Pan TB (2011) Analysis on interacting of close-vertical underpass existing subway during construction. In: IEEE international conference on electric technology and civil engineering, pp 3875–3878
Guo Chen, Wanming Zhai, Hongfu Zuo (2001) Safety management of track irregularities of 250 km/h high-speed railway. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ 5:495–499
Lee KM, Rowe RK (1990) Finite element modeling of the three-dimensional grounded formations due to tunneling in soft cohesive soils: part I–method of analysis. Comput Geotech 10:87–109
Lin Z (2013) Study on the effect of construction of undercrossing shield tunnel on the existing high-speed railway tunnel and its control technology. Cent South Univ 30:624–630
Liu HL, Li P, Liu JY (2011) Numerical investigation of underlying tunnel heave during a new tunnel construction. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(2):276–283
Huixi L, Minggao L, Shinan H et al (2011) The study of numerical analysis of adjacent construction safety for cross tunnels. J China Foreign Highw 3:221–224
Meide H, Jun L, Guiping L et al (2014) Deformation analysis for shield tunnel upper crossing by close range large section passageway. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(2):3682–3691
Midas GTS (Geotechnical and Tunnel analysis System). MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd, finite element analysis for geotechnical engineering
Minghua L, Lilin L, Xiaoyuan H et al (2009) Research on the control of track irregularity of high-speed railway. J Railw Eng Soc 9:26–30
Ministry of transport of the People’s Republic of China. JTG D70-2004 Specifications for design of highway tunnels. China Communications Press, Beijing
Wenge Q (2003) The study on mechanics principle and countermeasure of underground engineering construction. Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
Xiang YY, Jinlu Z, Wei L (2011) A theoretical method for prediction of the secondary stress and potential plastic zone induced by tunneling in load-bearing ground. China Civ Eng J 44(5):115122
Zhang K, Guo JB (2010) Research on the mechanical behaviors of new tunnel construction in the area orthogonal to existing metro tunnel. J Railw Eng Soc 2:19
Zhanrui W, Taiyue Q (2012) Study on mechanical behaviors of adjacent construction of over line air duct. Railw Stand Des 4:99–103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pan, W., Gao, Z., Zheng, C. et al. Analysis on the Influence of Cross Tunnel Construction on the Deformation of the Existing High-Speed Railway Tunnel. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 4001–4013 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0553-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0553-4