Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Two Empirical Correlations for Tunnel Squeezing Prediction Using Binary Logistic Regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Squeezing as a large time-dependent deformation can result in irreparable damages for tunneling projects. The accurate prediction of this phenomenon in preliminary stages of tunneling projects has a remarkable role on reducing its destructive effects. In this paper, two new empirical correlations have been presented for squeezing prediction before starting the tunneling project using binary logistic regression (BLR) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). These correlations have been developed based on a comprehensive database including 220 tunneling case histories. In both correlations, overburden depth (H) and rock mass quality (Q) are the independent variables and squeezing conditions can be predicted as the dependent variable. Quality assessment of these correlations indicated that both equations have high performances for squeezing prediction. In comparison to previously developed empirical equations, proposed equations have led to improvement of prediction capacity. The validation results reveal that LDA and BLR equations are better than the previously developed equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agan C (2016) Prediction of squeezing potential of rock masses around the Suruç Water tunnel. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:451–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barla G (1995) Squeezing rocks in tunnels. ISRM News J 2:44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Chern JC, Yu CW, Kao HC (1998) Tunneling in squeezing ground. In: Proceedings of fourth international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering. University of Missouri-Rolla, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 793–796

  • Como F, Carnesecchi E, Volani S, Dorne JL, Richardson J, Bassan A, Pavan M, Benfenati E (2017) Predicting acute contact toxicity of pesticides in honeybees (Apis mellifera) through a k-nearest neighbor model. Chemosphere 166:438–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi RD, Singh M, Viladkar MN, Goel RK (2013) Prediction of tunnel deformation in squeezing grounds. Eng Geol 161:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi RD, Singh M, Viladkar MN, Goel RK (2014) Estimation of support pressure during tunnelling through squeezing grounds. Eng Geol 168:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi Aghda SM, Ganjalipour K, Esmaeil Zadeh M (2016) Comparison of squeezing prediction methods: a case study on Nowsoud tunnel. Geotech Geol Eng 34:1487–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Jimenez R (2015) Predicting tunnel squeezing with incomplete data using Bayesian networks. Eng Geol 195:214–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi E, Gholizadeh H (2018) Prediction of squeezing potential in tunneling projects using data mining-based techniques. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0705-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithakan AG (1995) Tunnelling through the young Himalayas—a case history of the Maneri-Uttarkashi power tunnel. Eng Geol 39(1–2):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2014) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Kamber M, Pei J (2012) Data mining: concepts and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Marinos P (2000) Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses. Tunn Tunn Int 32:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez R, Recio D (2011) A linear classifier for probabilistic prediction pf squeezing conditions in Himalayan tunnels. Eng Geol 121:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanlari G, Meybodi RG, Mokhtari E (2012) Engineering geological study of the second part of water supply Karaj to Tehran tunnel with emphasis on squeezing problems. Eng Geol 145–146:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokach L, Maimon O (2015) Data mining with decision trees: theory and application, 2nd edn. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert W, Moritz B, Sellner P (1999) Tunnelling methods for squeezing ground. In: Proceedings of the 9th international congress on rock mechanics, Paris, France, pp 233–236

  • Shafiei A, Parsaei H, Dusseault MB (2012) Rock squeezing prediction by a support vector machine classifier. In: 46th U.S. rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, 24–27 June, Chicago, Illinois, ARMA-2012-435

  • Shrestha GL (2005) Stress induced problems in Himalayan tunnels with special reference to squeezing. Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

  • Singh B, Jethwa JL, Dube AK, Singh B (1992) Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 7:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS 16.0 (2007) Statistical analysis software (standard version). SPSS, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Feng X, Yang L (2018) Predicting tunnel squeezing using multiclass support vector machines. Adv Civ Eng, Article ID 4543984

  • Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebrahim Ghasemi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Database for Development of BLR and LDA Correlations (Shafiei et al. 2012; Feng and Jimenez 2015)

Appendix 1: Database for Development of BLR and LDA Correlations (Shafiei et al. 2012; Feng and Jimenez 2015)

Case No.

Depth of cover (H, m)

Rock mass quality (Q)

Squeezing condition

1

225

3.6

0

2

550

4.5

0

3

300

0.4

0

4

150

0.4

0

5

200

0.4

0

6

250

8.5

0

7

200

0.57

0

8

175

0.84

0

9

250

2.71

0

10

150

1.1

0

11

300

6

0

12

220

0.8

0

13

52

15

0

14

34

15

0

15

225

3.6

0

16

340

1.8

0

17

550

5.1

0

18

98

0.080

0

19

111

0.008

0

20

112

0.060

0

21

212

0.040

0

22

261

0.095

0

23

95

0.065

0

24

126

0.300

0

25

138

0.013

0

26

198

0.140

0

27

130

0.200

0

28

276

0.250

0

29

276

0.280

0

30

140

0.009

0

31

300

0.090

0

32

300

0.050

0

33

158

0.230

0

34

112

0.008

0

35

225

0.140

0

36

218

0.070

0

37

114

0.470

0

38

114

0.600

0

39

112

0.008

0

40

250

2.700

0

41

300

1.900

0

42

400

0.512

0

43

181

1.250

0

44

110

0.046

0

45

110

1.000

0

46

140

0.215

0

47

140

2.154

0

48

80

93.500

0

49

190

7.450

0

50

130

1.530

0

51

80

10.000

0

52

500

21.544

0

53

30

0.197

0

54

60

0.021

0

55

30

0.004

0

56

180

4.100

0

57

180

2.200

0

58

160

1.500

0

59

200

5.000

0

60

200

1.000

0

61

160

2.000

0

62

200

0.513

0

63

400

4.140

0

64

490

13.100

0

65

570

3.030

0

66

1217

0.263

0

67

1270

0.367

0

68

1226

0.459

0

69

101

0.067

0

70

115

0.167

0

71

102

0.592

0

72

101

1.666

0

73

101

16.657

0

74

101

51.593

0

75

153

37.272

0

76

261

30.956

0

77

261

4.947

0

78

365

5.325

0

79

394

1.562

0

80

157

1.034

0

81

80

1.300

0

82

80

1.100

0

83

50

4.642

0

84

308

0.541

0

85

280

0.05

1

86

280

0.022

1

87

380

0.51

1

88

240

0.12

1

89

300

0.023

1

90

350

0.5

1

91

480

0.8

1

92

410

0.18

1

93

680

0.05

1

94

100

0.010

1

95

100

0.005

1

96

284

0.090

1

97

112

0.006

1

98

800

2.500

1

99

500

0.030

1

100

400

0.030

1

101

285

0.100

1

102

410

0.300

1

103

415

0.880

1

104

500

1.000

1

105

510

0.880

1

106

440

0.050

1

107

450

0.060

1

108

400

0.030

1

109

400

0.050

1

110

200

0.020

1

111

325

0.030

1

112

700

0.300

1

113

550

1.700

1

114

635

4.000

1

115

650

4.120

1

116

450

0.310

1

117

750

0.500

1

118

450

0.590

1

119

337

0.007

1

120

337

0.011

1

121

337

0.006

1

122

337

0.080

1

123

550

0.029

1

124

600

0.023

1

125

600

0.030

1

126

600

0.018

1

127

620

0.020

1

128

620

0.008

1

129

620

0.009

1

130

620

0.016

1

131

620

0.020

1

132

620

0.025

1

133

580

0.023

1

134

580

0.025

1

135

550

0.025

1

136

575

0.007

1

137

700

0.417

1

138

700

0.333

1

139

750

0.333

1

140

600

0.250

1

141

850

0.056

1

142

600

0.033

1

143

300

0.001

1

144

400

0.003

1

145

800

0.194

1

146

300

0.033

1

147

312

0.094

1

148

280

0.083

1

149

270

0.125

1

150

285

0.063

1

151

280

0.031

1

152

280

0.042

1

153

727

2.287

1

154

736

2.426

1

155

733

2.903

1

156

690

1.650

1

157

577

1.517

1

158

200

0.020

1

159

218

0.013

1

160

252

0.010

1

161

246

0.010

1

162

284

0.008

1

163

285

0.008

1

164

211

0.010

1

165

238

0.010

1

166

230

0.015

1

167

223

0.015

1

168

120

0.010

1

169

500

0.215

1

170

500

1.000

1

171

400

0.001

1

172

400

0.046

1

173

650

3.400

1

174

650

0.640

1

175

100

0.100

1

176

650

4.240

1

177

650

0.087

1

178

400

0.211

1

179

100

0.050

1

180

890

0.120

1

181

580

0.236

1

182

250

0.060

1

183

230

0.210

1

184

285

0.004

1

185

102

0.016

1

186

396

0.394

1

187

200

0.173

1

188

183

0.148

1

189

150

0.003

1

190

150

0.316

1

191

31

0.001

1

192

200

0.031

1

193

33

0.001

1

194

46

0.001

1

195

45

0.003

1

196

77

0.001

1

197

53

0.001

1

198

80

0.001

1

199

96

0.002

1

200

100

0.001

1

201

99

0.004

1

202

96

0.008

1

203

74

0.009

1

204

91

0.021

1

205

96

0.018

1

206

139

0.025

1

207

142

0.017

1

208

202

0.004

1

209

199

0.022

1

210

277

0.021

1

211

279

0.005

1

212

399

0.006

1

213

348

0.028

1

214

100

0.004

1

215

300

0.06

1

216

355

0.341

1

217

255

0.04

1

218

180

0.063

1

219

284

0.095

1

220

112

0.006

1

  1. 0 non-squeezing and 1 squeezing condition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, E., Gholizadeh, H. Development of Two Empirical Correlations for Tunnel Squeezing Prediction Using Binary Logistic Regression and Linear Discriminant Analysis. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 3435–3446 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-00758-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-00758-0

Keywords

Navigation