Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Optimized Artificial Neural Network Structure to Predict Clay Sensitivity in a High Landslide Prone Area Using Piezocone Penetration Test (CPTu) Data: A Case Study in Southwest of Sweden

  • Comments/Discussions and Replies
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Application of artificial neural networks (ANN) in various aspects of geotechnical engineering problems such as site characterization due to have difficulty to solve or interrupt through conventional approaches has demonstrated some degree of success. In the current paper a developed and optimized five layer feed-forward back-propagation neural network with 4-4-4-3-1 topology, network error of 0.00201 and R2 = 0.941 under the conjugate gradient descent ANN training algorithm was introduce to predict the clay sensitivity parameter in a specified area in southwest of Sweden. The close relation of this parameter to occurred landslides in Sweden was the main reason why this study is focused on. For this purpose, the information of 70 piezocone penetration test (CPTu) points was used to model the variations of clay sensitivity and the influences of direct or indirect related parameters to CPTu has been taken into account and discussed in detail. Applied operation process to find the optimized ANN model using various training algorithms as well as different activation functions was the main advantage of this paper. The performance and feasibility of proposed optimized model has been examined and evaluated using various statistical and analytical criteria as well as regression analyses and then compared to in situ field tests and laboratory investigation results. The sensitivity analysis of this study showed that the depth and pore pressure are the two most and cone tip resistance is the least effective factor on prediction of clay sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aas G, Lacasse S, Lunne T, Hoeg K (1986) Use of in situ tests for foundation design on clay. Use of in situ tests in geotechnical engineering (GSP 6). ASCE, New York, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Åhnberg H, Larsson R (2012) Strength degradation of clay due to cyclic loadings and enforced deformation. Report No 75, Swedish Geotechnical Institute (SGI), Linköping, Sweden

  • Anagnostopoulosi A, Koukis G, Sabatakakis N, Tsliambaos G (2003) Empirical correlations of soil parameters based on Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) for Greek soils. Geotech Geol Eng 21:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baligh MM, Vivatrat V, Ladd CC (1980) Cone penetration in soil profiling. J Geotech Eng 112(7):727–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yam Y (1997) Dynamics of complex systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Basheer IA, Reddi LN, Najjar YM (1996) Site characterization by neuronets: an application to the landfill sitting problem. Ground Water 34:610–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baziar MH, Ghorbani A (2005) Evaluation of lateral spreading using artificial neural networks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas DP (1995) Nonlinear programming. Athena Scientific, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai GJ, Liu SY, Tong LY (2010) Field evaluation of deformation characteristics of a lacustrine clay deposit using seismic piezocone tests. Eng Geol 116(3):251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cal Y (1995) Soil classification by neural-network. Adv Eng Softw 22(2):95–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Geotechnical Society (2006) Canadian foundation engineering manual, 4th edn. p 506

  • Celik S, Tan O (2005) Determination of pre-consolidation pressure with artificial neural network. Civil Eng Environ Syst 22(4):217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cevik A, Sezer EA, Cabalar AF, Gokceoglu C (2011) Modeling of the uniaxial compressive strength of some clay-bearing rocks using neural network. Appl Soft Comput 11:2587–2594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das SK (2005) Applications of genetic algorithm and artificial neural network to some geotechnical engineering problems. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India

  • Erzin Y (2007) Artificial neural networks approach for swell pressure versus soil suction behavior. Can Geotech J 44(10):1215–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahlman SE (1988) Faster learning variations on back propagation: an empirical study. In: Sejnowski TJ, Hinton GE, Touretzky DS (eds) Connectionist models summer school. Proceedings of the 1988 connectionist summer school, San Mateo, USA

  • Fahlman SE, Lebiere C (1990) The cascade-correlation learning architecture. In: Touretzky DS (ed) Advances in neural information processing systems 2. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, pp 524–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, and applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Steeger TM, Rohn J, Czurda K (2002) Identification of landslide areas with neural nets for hazard analysis. In: Rybar J, Stemnerk J, Wagner P (eds) Landslides. Proceedings of the IECL, Prague, Cz. Rep. June 24–26, 2002. Balkema, The Netherland, pp 163–168

  • Goh AT (2002) Probabilistic neural network for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential. Can Geotech J 39(1):219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribb MM, Gribb GW (1994) Use of neural networks for hydraulic conductivity determination in unsaturated soil. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on ground water ecology, Bethesda, pp 155–163

  • Hanna AM, Ural D, Saygili G (2007) Neural network model for liquefaction potential in soil deposits using Turkey and Taiwan earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(6):521–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong S, Lee M, Kim J, Lee W (2010) Evaluation of undrained shear strength of Busan clay using CPT, 2nd international symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT’10. In: Proceedings of 2nd international symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT’10, online, 2010. Paper No. 2–23

  • Hubick KT (1992) Artificial neural networks in Australia. Department of Industry, Technology and Commerce, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43(3):351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaksa MB (1995) The influence of spatial variability on the geotechncial design properties of a stiff, overconsolidated clay. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide

  • Jamiolkowski M, Lancellotta R, Tordella L, Battaglio M (1982) Undrained Strength from CPT. In: Proceedings of 2nd European symposium on penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 599–606

  • Jong YH, Lee CI (2004) Influence of geological conditions on the powder factor for tunnel blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(Supplement 1):533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsrud K, Lunne T, Brattlieu K (1996) Improved CPTu correlations based on block samples. Nordisk Geoteknikermote, Reykjavik

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson R, Hansbo S (1989) Soil classification and identification. Byggforskningsrådet Doc D 8:1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Kim B (2006) Use of artificial neural networks in the prediction of liquefaction resistance of sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1502–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KK, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2006) Interpretation of cone penetration tests in cohesive soils. Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22. Joint transportation research program, Indiana Department of Transportation and school of Civil Engineering Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. doi:10.5703/1288284313387

  • Klingberg F (2010) Bottenförhållanden i Göta Älv: SGU-rapport 2010:7. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rochelle P, Zebdi PM, Leroueil S, Tavenas F, Virely D (1988) Piezocone tests in sensitive clays of eastern Canada. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on penetration testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, 2, Balkema Pub., Rotterdam, pp 831–841

  • Le Bihan JP, Leroueil S (1981) The fall cone and behavior of remoulded clay. Terratech Ltd, Research report, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SJ, Lee SR, Kim YS (2003) An approach to estimate unsaturated shear strength using artificial neural network and hyperbolic formulation. Comput Geotech 30(6):489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindskog G (1983) Brief report of the investigation of the slope stability along the river in Göta River valley. Statens Geotekniska Institut, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourakis MIA (2005) A brief description of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm implemented by levmar. Technical Report, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas

  • Lundström K, Larsson R, Dahlin T (2009) Mapping of quick clay formations using geotechnical and geophysical methods. Landslides 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunne T, Kleven A (1981) Role of CPT in North Sea foundation engineering. In: Symposium on cone penetration engineering division, ASCE, pp 49–75

  • Lunne T, Robertson PK, Powell JJM (1997) Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. Blackie Academic, EF Spon/Routledge Publ, New York, p 312

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunne T, Christoffersen H, Tjelta T (1985) Engineering use of piezocone data in North Sea clays, In: Proceedings of ICSMFE–11; San Francisco, 2, 1985, pp 907–912

  • Lunne T, Eidsmoen T, Gillespie D, Howland JD (1986) Laboratory and field evaluation of cone penetrometer. In: Proceedings of in situ ‘86, use of in situ tests in geotechnical engineering. ASCE GSP 6, Blacksburg, Virginia, pp 714–729

  • Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for prediction and forecasting of water resource variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environ Model softw 15:101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J Appl Math 11:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maulenkamp F, Grima MA (1999) Application of neural networks for the prediction of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) from equotip hardness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayoraz F, Cornu T, Vuillet L (1996) Using neural networks to predict slope movements. In: Proceedings of VII international symposium on landslides, Trondheim, June 1966, 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 295–300

  • McCulloch WS, Pitts WH (1943) A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5(4):115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Brandon TL (1998) Analysis and Use of CPT in earthquake and environmental engineering. In: Keynote lecture, proceedings of ICS’98, vol 1, pp 69–97

  • Nadim F, Pedersen SAS, Schmidt-Thomé P, Sigmundsson F, Engdahl M (2008) Natural hazards in Nordic Countries. Episodes 31(1):176–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson B (1999) Damping parameter In Marquardt’s method. Technical Report IMM-REP-1999- 05, Dept. of Mathematical Modeling, Technical University Denmark

  • Park HL (2011) Study for application of artificial neural networks in geotechnical problems. In: Hui CLP (ed) Artificial neural networks-application. InTech, Croatia, pp 303–336. doi:10.5772/2052. ISBN 978-953-307-188-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rad NS, Lunne T (1988) Direct correlations between piezocone test results and undrained shear strength of clay. In: Proceedings of 1st international symposium on penetration testing, Orlando, vol 2, pp 911–917

  • Rankka K, Andersson-Sköld Y, Hultén C, Larsson R, Leroux V, Dahlin T (2004) Quick clay in Sweden. Report 65. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping

  • Rémai Z (2013) Correlation of undrained shear strength and CPT resistance. Period Polytech Civil Eng 57(1):39–44. doi:10.3311/PPci.2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK (1990) Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 27(1):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK (1999) Estimation of minimum undrained shear strength for flow liquefaction using the CPT. In: Seco e Pinto (ed) Earthquake geotechnical engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Robertson PK (2008) Discussion of ‘liquefaction of silts from CPTu. Can Geotech J 44:140–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Campanella RG, Gillespie D, Greig J (1986) Use of piezometer cone data. In-situ’86 use of in-situ testing in geotechnical engineering, GSP 6, ASCE, Reston, VA, Specialty Publication, pp 1263–1280

  • Robitaille D, Demers D, Potvin J, Pellerin F (2002) Mapping of landslide-prone areas in the Saguenay region, Qubec, Canada. In: Instability-planning and management. Tomas Tellford, London

  • Rojas R (1996) Neural networks—a systematic introduction, chapter 7, the back propagation algorithm. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~rojas/neural/chap7.p.s

  • Rosenquist IT (1953) Considerations on the sensitivity of Norwegian quick-clays. Geotechnique 3:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Chapter 8, learning internal representation by error propagation parallel distribution processing: exploration in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayadi A, Monjezi M, Talebi N, Khandelwal M (2013) A comparative study on the application of various artificial neural networks to simultaneous prediction of rock fragmentation and backbreak. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann JH (1975) Measurement of in situ shear strength. In: Proceedings of specialty conference on in situ measurement of soil properties: ASCE, Raleigh, vol 2, pp 57–138

  • Seed RB, Harder LF Jr (1990) SPT-based analysis of cyclic pore pressure generation and undrained residual strength. In: Duncan JM (ed) Proceedings, seed memorial symposium, BiTech Publishers, Vancouver, pp 351–376

  • Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2001) Artificial neural network applications in geotechnical engineering. Aust Geomech 36(1):49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin MA, Jaksa MB, Maier HR (2008) State of the art of artificial neural networks in geotechnical engineering. Electron J Geotech Eng Bouquet 08:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahri AA, Malehmir A, Juhlin C (2015) Soil classification analysis based on piezocone penetration test data—a case study from a quick-clay landslide site in southwestern Sweden. Eng Geol 189:32–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewchuk JR (1994) An introduction to the conjugate gradient method without the agonizing pain, 1 1/4 edn. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

  • Sinha SK, Wang MC (2008) Artificial neural network prediction models for soil compaction and permeability. Geotech Eng J 26(1):47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW, Northey RD (1952) The sensitivity of clays. Geotechnique 3:30–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soderblom R (1969) Salt in Swedish clays and its importance for quick clay formation. In: Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Proceedings, vol 22

  • Solheim A, Berg K, Forsberg CF, Bryn P (2005) The storegga slide complex: repetitive large scale sliding with similar cause and development. Mar Pet Geol 22:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark TD, Juhrend JE (1989) Undrained shear strength from cone penetration tests. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Rio de Janeiro, vol 1, pp 327–330

  • Stark TD, Mesri G (1992) Undrained shear strength of sands for stability analysis. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 118(11):1727–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1944) Ends and means in soil mechanics. Eng J 27:608–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance JK (1983) Towards a general model of quick clay development. Sedimentology 30:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transtrum MK, Sethna JP (2012) Improvements to the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear least-squares minimization. Preprint submitted to Journal of Computational Physics, Cornell University Library. arXiv:1201.5885

  • Tumay MT, Boggess RL, Acar Y (1981) Subsurface investigation with piezocone penetrometer. ASCE GSP Cone Penetr Test Exp, St Louis, pp 325–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth CP (1984) The interpretation of in situ soil tests. Geotechnique 34(4):449–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wride CE, McRoberts EC, Robertson PK (1999) Reconsideration of case histories for estimating undrained shear strength in sandy soils. Can Geotech J 36:907–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Rosenbaum MS (2002) The artificial neural network as a tool for assessing geotechnical properties. Geotech Eng J 20(2):149–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimine M, Robertson PK, Wride CE (1999) Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction. Can Geotech J 36:891–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer I, Bai CG (2003) Application of artificial neural network for water quality management. Int J Lowland Technol 5(2):10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Wu X (1994) Use of neural networks in the analysis and interpretation of site investigation data. Comput Geotech 16:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuidberg HM, Schaap LHJ, Beringen FL (1982) A penetrometer for simultaneously measuring of cone resistance, sleeve friction and dynamic pore pressure. In: Proceedings of the second European symposium on penetration testing, Amsterdam, vol 2, pp 963–970

  • Zurada JM (1992) Introduction to artificial neural systems. West Publishing Company, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri

  2. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, 10044, Stockholm, Sweden

    Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri

Authors
  1. Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbaszadeh Shahri, A. An Optimized Artificial Neural Network Structure to Predict Clay Sensitivity in a High Landslide Prone Area Using Piezocone Penetration Test (CPTu) Data: A Case Study in Southwest of Sweden. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 745–758 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-9976-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-9976-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation