Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Flow Reduction due to Hydraulic Barrier Engineering Structure: Case of Urban Area Flood, Contamination and Pollution Risk Assessment

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study a vertical barrier forming the exclusion system in relation to partials extending into an impermeable stratum was analysed using a 3-D numerical modelling used to quantify the effect of a hydraulic barrier on flow which allows taking the anisotropy and heterogeneity of the site in a complex hydrogeological context and hydraulic barrier into account. A simulation in this study shows that for 0 % cut off the % reduction in flow is 0 and for 100 % cut off the % reduction in flow is 96, 94 and 92 % at 5, 10 and 15 days respectively due to leakage through the sheet piles, even with 100 % of the aquifer cutoff, the % of groundwater inflow impounded never reaches the 100 %. Also the change in trend where the % reduction in flow increases significantly with % cut off occurs at around 60 % cut off. That is, the reduction in flow through the aquifer only becomes significant after 60 % cut off by the sheet piles. The sensitivity analysis allows determining the factors of influence. A sensitivity analysis indicates the relationship appears relatively less sensitivity to varying the hydraulic conductivity, but very sensitive to the % cut-off. Therefore the effect of the sheet piles start to be significant after cut off exceeds 80 % and that the total profile length matters, i.e. the 60 % cut off must be applied to the whole width of the aquifer and not a portion of the aquifer, i.e. the minimum required to adequately reduce flow under the levee is 80 % cut off. From this study it can be derived that less water flows to a levee structure surrounded by sheet piles, depending on the depth of the sheet piles in proportion to the depth of the water bearing layer. The relationship is independent for the hydraulic conductivity but dependent on the ratio between the installation depth of the sheet piles beneath the Piezometric level and the depth of the bottom of the water bearing layer beneath the same Piezometric level. This study demonstrated the major influence of the technical design of the barrier on the simulated flow disturbances. The current approach can be applied elsewhere in related field for variety of application including formulating a resource management strategy, contamination containment and settlement risk. Overall, the capacity of decision makers to understand flow systems, how they function and respond to the placement of hydraulic barriers in the area they manage will form the basis for the operational management of the resources and infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attard G, Winiarski T, Rossier Y, Eisenlohr L (2016) Review: impact of underground structures on the flow of urban groundwater. Hydrogeol J 24:5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray S, Ahmadian R, Falconer AR (2016) Impact of representation of hydraulic structures in modelling a Severn barrage. Comput Geosci 89(96):106. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2016.01.010

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JJ, Zhang L, Zhang JF, Zhu YF, Wang JH (2013) Field tests, modification, and application of deep soil mixing method in soft clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(1):24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel DE (1993) Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deveughele M, Zokimila P, Cojean R (2010) Impact of an impervious shallow gallery on groundwater flow. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin MC, Morgan JR (2001) Groundwater control around a large basement. Can Geotech J 38(4):732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Han J (2009) 3D coupled mechanical and hydraulic modeling of a geosynthetic-reinforced deep mixed column-supported embankment. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HydroGeoLogic Inc (2002) MODFLOW-SURFACT: A comprehensive MODFLOW-based hydrologic modelling system: code documentation and user’s manual. HydroGeoLogic Inc, Reston

  • Janssen GJM (2001) Do subsurface structures form a barrier for groundwater flow? Professional journal of the Netherlands society of KIVI

  • Kimura M, Inazumi S, Too JKA, Isobe K, Mitsuda Y, Nishiyama Y (2007) Development and application of H-joint steel pipe sheet piles in construction of foundations for structures. Soils Found 47(2):237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight DJ, Smith GL, Sutton JS (1996) Sizewell B foundation dewatering—system design, construction and performance monitoring. Géotechnique 6(3):473–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HT, Tan YC, Chen CH, Yu HL, Wu SC, Ke KY (2010) Estimation of effective hydrogeological parameters in heterogeneous and anisotropic aquifers. J Hydrol 389(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Xu YS, Shen SL, Sun WJ (2014) Evaluation of the hydraulic conductivity of aquifers with piles. Hydrogeol J 22(2):371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Kavvadas M (1997) Rise of the groundwater table when flow is obstructed by shallow tunnels. In: Groundwater in the urban areas: problems processes and management. 27th conference international of association Hydrogeologists (IAH), Nottingham, UK, September 1997, pp 21–27

  • Peng FL, Wang HL, Tan Y, Xu ZL, Li YL (2011) Field measurements and finite-element method simulation of a tunnel shaft constructed by pneumatic caisson method in Shanghai soft ground. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(5):516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preene M (2012) Groundwater lowering in construction: a practical guide to dewatering, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pujades E, Carrera J, Vázquez-Suñé E, Jurado A, Vilarrasa V, Mascuñano-Salvador E (2012a) Hydraulic characterization of diaphragm walls for cut and cover tunnelling. Eng Geol 125(27):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujades E, Lopez A, Carrera J, Vazquez-Sune E, Jurado A (2012b) Barrier effect of underground structures on aquifers. Eng Geol 145–146:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujades E, Vázquez-Suñé E, Carrera J, Jurado A (2014) Dewatering of a deep excavation undertaken in a layered soil. Eng Geol 178:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaqour FM, Hasan SE (2008) Groundwater control for construction purposes: a case study from Kuwait. Environ Geol 53(8):1603–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Wang DL (2013) Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(11):1894–1910 II: Top-down construction of the peripheral rectangular pit

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilarrasa V, Carrera J, Jurado A, Pujades E, Vázquez-Suné E (2011) A methodology for characterizing the hydraulic effectiveness of an annular low-permeability barrier. Eng Geol 120(1–4):68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Hu L, Wu L, Tang Y, Zhu Y, Yang P (2009) Hydraulic barrier function of the underground continuous concrete wall in the pit of subway station and its optimization. Environ Geol 57(2):447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Feng B, Yu H, Guo T, Yang G, Tang J (2013) Numerical study of dewatering in a large deep foundation pit. Environ Earth Sci 69(3):863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (2015) An introduction to geotechnical processes. CRC Press. ISBN-10: 0415286468

  • Wu Y, Shen S, Yin Z, Xu Y (2015a) Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. II: numerical analysis. Can Geotech J 52(10):1539–1549. doi:10.1139/cgj-2014-0289

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu YX, Shen S, Xu YS, Yin ZY (2015b) Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. I: field observations. Can Geotechn J 52(10):1526–1538. doi:10.1139/cgj-2014-0289

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu YS, Shen SL, Du YJ (2009) Geological and hydrogeological environment in Shanghai with geohazards to construction and maintenance of infrastructures. Eng Geol 109(3–4):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author acknowledges the contribution from the reviewers who improves the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yohannes Yihdego.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yihdego, Y. Evaluation of Flow Reduction due to Hydraulic Barrier Engineering Structure: Case of Urban Area Flood, Contamination and Pollution Risk Assessment. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1643–1654 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0071-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0071-1

Keywords

Navigation