Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation of Uniform Sand Specimens Using Stationary Pluviation and Vibratory Methods

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relative density is an important state parameter that influences the soil behavior. Preparation of sand specimens with uniform density is critical during large-scale laboratory testing in geotechnical engineering. In this study, the details of a stationary air pluviation device used to prepare uniform sand specimens in a large-size test chamber with dimensions equal to 900 mm × 900 mm × 1000 mm (in length, width, and depth) are provided. The proposed device is found to be simple to construct due to presence of only two diffuser sieves with an ability to produce uniform sand beds in a reasonably quick time. Prior to construction of full-scale pluviation device, a scaled-down model of the device with plan dimensions equal to 300 mm × 300 mm is fabricated to perform calibration studies. The range of densities of two gradations of Indian Standard sand (IS Grade II and IS Grade III) obtained using this device for various heights of fall of sand particles and passing through different opening sizes are provided. Relative density in the range of 53–99 % and 74–99 % is achieved for IS Grade II and III sands, respectively. The spatial uniformity in densities is also assessed, and the coefficient of variation (COV) in the density is found to be less than about 7 %. In addition to pluviation method, uniform sand beds are also prepared using pneumatically-operated vibratory method. The target relative density of sand bed is achieved by adjusting the pressure of compressed air inside the vibrator, and the maximum relative density of IS Grade II and Grade III sands from vibratory method is found to be higher than that from pluviation method for the range of pressures chosen in the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) D-4253 (2006) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) D-4254 (2006) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) D-422 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) D-7382 (2008) Standard test methods for determination of maximum dry unit weight and water content range for effective compaction of granular soils using a vibrating hammer. ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) D-854 (2014) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker THW, Konrad JM (1985) Effect of sample preparation on the strength of artificially frozen sand. In: Fourth International Symposium on Ground Freezing/Sapporo, Ottawa, Canada: Division of Building Research, NRCC

  • Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sand. Geotechnique 35(2):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellotti R, Morabito P (1986) Checks of the uniformity of the calibration chamber specifications. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Calibration Chamber, Milano, Italy

  • Bellotti R, Bizzi G, Ghionna VN (1982) Design, construction and use of a calibration chamber. In: Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, vol 2, pp 439–446

  • Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Geotechnique 36(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Standard (BS) BS1377-1 (1990) Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. General requirements and sample preparation. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  • British Standard (BS) BS1377-14 (1975) Determination of the dry density/moisture content relationship of granular soil (vibrating hammer method). British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerato AB (2005) Scale effects of shallow foundation bearing capacity on granular material. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts

  • Chen HT, Lee CJ, Chen HW (1998) The traveling pluviation apparatus for sand specimen preparation. Tokyo, Japan, Centrifuge, vol 98, pp 143–148

  • Cho GC, Dodds J, Santamarina JC (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(5):591–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coop MR, Sorensen KK, Freitas TB, Georgeoutsos G (2004) Particle breakage during shearing of a corbonate sand. Geotechnique 54(3):157–163. doi:10.1680/geot.2004.54.3.157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell A, Barton ME, Brown R (1999) Determining the maximum density of sands by pluviation. Geotech Test J 22(4):324–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dave TN, Dasaka SM (2012) Assessment of portable travelling pluviator to prepare reconstituted sand specimens. Geomech Eng 4(2):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio VB (1990) Loading systems, sample preparation and liquefaction. J Geotech Eng, ASCE 116(5):805–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della N, Arab A (2010) Laboratory investigation on the saturation and initial structure effects on the undrained behavior of granular soil under static loading. Acta Polytech Hungarica 7(5):143–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickin EA (1973) Influence of grain shape and size upon the limiting porosities of sands, evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils, ASTM STP5 (3). Am Soc Test Mater 113–120

  • Fannin J, Raju DJ (1993) Large scale pull-out test results on geosynthetics. In: Proceedings of Geosynthetics Conference, Vancouver, Canada, vol 2, pp 633–643

  • Fretti C, Lo Presti DCE, Pedroni S (1995) A Pluvial deposition method to reconstitute well-graded sand specimens. Geotech Test J 18(2):292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost JD (1989) Studies on the monotonic and cyclic behavior of sands. Ph.D. thesis. Purdue University

  • Guimaraes M (2002) Crushed stone fines and ion removal from clay slurries-Fundamental studies. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

  • http://www.tamingranites.com. Accessed 23 Sept 2015

  • Joshi AC, Patra NR (2011) Tensile response of pile groups under compression. Part 1: experimental investigations. Geo-Front, ASCE 232–242

  • Kim Y (2009) Static simple shear characteristics of nak-dong river clean sand. KSCE J Civil Eng 13(6):389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2010) Use of dynamic cone penetration and clegg hammer tests for quality control of roadway compaction and construction. West Lafayette, Indiana: Publication FHWA and Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University

  • Kolbuszewski JJ (1948a) An empirical study of maximum and minimum porosities of sand. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherland: ISSMGE, vol 1, pp 158–165

  • Kolbuszewski JJ (1948b) General investigations of the fundamental factors controlling loose packing of sands. In: Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherland, ISSMGE, vol 7, pp 47–49

  • Kolbuszewski JJ, Frederick MR (1963) The significance of particle shape and size on the mechanical behaviour of granular materials. In: European Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, vol 1, pp 253–263

  • Lade PV, Yamamuro JA, Bopp PA (1996) Significance of particle crushing in granular materials. J Geotech Eng 122(4):309–316. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:4(309)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Prezzi M, Salgado R (2011) Experimental investigation of the combined load response of model piles driven in sand. Geotech Test J 34(6):653–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XS, Dafalias YF (2000) Dilatancy for cohesion less soils. Geotechnique 50(4):449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Presti DCF, Berardi R, Pedroni S, Crippa V (1992) Maximum dry density of cohesionless soils by pluviation and by ASTM D4253-83: a comparative study. Geotech Test J 15(2):180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Presti DCF, Berardi R, Pedroni S, Crippa V (1993) A New traveling sand pluviator to reconstitute specimens of well-graded silty sands. Geotech Test J 16(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer N, Nernheim A, Kohler U (2004) Geosynthetic-soil interaction under cyclic loading. In: 3rd European Geosynthetics Conference, Munich, Germany, pp 635–639

  • Miura S, Toki S (1982) A sample preparation method and effects on static and cyclic deformation-strength properties of sand. Soil Found, JSSMFE 22(1):61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochiai H, Hayashi S, Otani J (1992) Evaluation of pull-out resistance of geogrid reinforced soils. In: International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, Fukuoka, Japan, pp 141–146

  • Oda M, Koishikawa I, Higuchi T (1978) Experimental study of anisotropic shear strength of sand by plane strain tests. Soils Found 18(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira F, Freitas A, Morais P, Mendes B, Carvalho AT, Serra JB (2012) A Travelling sand pluviator to reconstruct large soil specimens. In: 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Porto/Portugal, Paper ref: 3761

  • Paik KH, Lee SR (1993) Behavior of soil plugs in open-ended model piles driven into sands. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 11(4):353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passalacqua R (1991) A sand spreader used for the reconstitution of granular soil models. Soils Found 31(2):175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rad NS, Tumay MT (1987) Factors affecting sand specimen preparation by raining. Geotech Test J 10(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunandan ME, Juneja A, Benson Hsiung BC (2012) Preparation of reconstituted sand samples in the laboratory. Int J Geotech Eng 6:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadrekarimi A, Olson SM (2010) Particle damage observed in ring shear tests on sands. Can Geotech J 47:491–515. doi:10.1139/T09-117

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado R, Mitchell JK, Jamiolkowski M (1998) Calibration of chamber size effects on penetration resistance in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:628–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka F, Muramatsu M, Sasaki T (1982) Cyclic undrained stress-strain behavior of dense sand by torsional simple shear tests. Soils Found 22(2):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP, Negussey D (1984) Relative density of pluviated sand samples. Soils Found 24(2):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RP, Whitaker T (1967) An apparatus for forming uniform beds of sand for model foundation tests. Geotechnique 17:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CS, Hong YS (2009) Laboratory tests on geosynthetic-encapsulated sand columns. Geotext Geomembr 27:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda S, Nagase H, Marui H (1992) Cyclic pull-out test of geogrids in soils. In: International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, Fukuoka, Japan, pp 185–190

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chennarapu Hariprasad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hariprasad, C., Rajashekhar, M. & Umashankar, B. Preparation of Uniform Sand Specimens Using Stationary Pluviation and Vibratory Methods. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1909–1922 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0064-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0064-0

Keywords

Navigation