Abstract
This paper investigates various multiseam mining related parameters using mine site specific data and numerical simulations. Two important mining effects—subsidence and stress—are analysed for different possible mining layouts. A geological mine dataset has been used to generate a numerical model. The predicted surface subsidence magnitude and surface profile have been compared under different scenarios to assess potential options in multiseam mining strategies. The effects that seam separation distances, mining offset, panel layout and panel orientation each have on surface subsidence and chain pillar stress magnitude have been investigated. The numerical simulation shows that ascending or descending mining directions have little impact on controlling the surface subsidence in multiseam mining and predicted an almost identical maximum stress development at the chain pillars. Numerical simulations infer that the orientation of the top panels control the subsidence profile.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adhikary DP, Dyskin AV (1997) A Cosserat continuum model for layered media. Comput Geotech 20(1):15–45
Bigby D, Cassie J, Altounyan P, Moore D (2007) Recent UK experience of working above previously extracted longwalls. In: Proceeding of the 26th international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown, WV, USA
Cosserat E, Cosserat F (1909) Theorie des corps deformables. Hermann, Paris
Ellenberger J, Chase F, Mark C (2003) Case histories of multiple seam coal mining to advance mine design. In: Proceeding of the 22nd international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown, WV, pp 59–64
Hill RW (1995) Multiple seam mining in South African collieries. In: Peng SS (ed) Proceedings of the 14th international conference on ground control in mining. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, pp 305–311
Khanal M, Adhikary D, Balusu R (2011) Effect of strata properties and panel widths on chock performance. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 3:407–414
Khanal M, Adhikary D, Balusu R (2014) Prefeasibility study—geotechnical studies for introducing longwall top coal caving in indian mines. J Min Sci 50(4):719–732
Latilla J, Wijk Jv, Booysen H, Silver C, Fourie P (2007) Multiple seam interactions of relatively shallow, high seam shortwalls in South Africa. In: Proceeding of the 26th international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown, WV
Mark C, Chase FE, Pappas DM (2007) Analysis of multiple seam stability. In: Proceeding of the 26th international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown, WV
Medhurst T (2008) Preliminary assessment of longwall support capacity, Kakatiya LW project report no. 8310, report submitted to CSIRO exploration and mining by PDR engineers
SCT Report to CSIRO (2010) Report number CSIRO3614A
Sears M, Heasley K (2013) Calibrating the Lamodel program for shallow cover multiple-seam mines. In: Proceeding of the 32nd international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown, WV
Wagner H, Schumann EHR (1991) Surface effect of total coal seam extractions by underground mining methods. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 91:221–231
Witthaus H, Opolony K (2007) Ground control for multiple seam mining in german coal mines. In: Proceeding of the 26th international conference on ground control in mining. Morgantown, WV
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khanal, M., Adhikary, D., Jayasundara, C. et al. Numerical Study of Mine Site Specific Multiseam Mining and Its Impact on Surface Subsidence and Chain Pillar Stress. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 217–235 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9940-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9940-2