Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Cutoff Walls Under Hydraulic Structures Against Uplift Pressure and Piping Phenomenon

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is focused on a numerical method to investigate the performance of cutoff walls system against uplift pressure and piping phenomenon. The parametric study has been conducted on the variation of cutoff wall parameters such as inclination angle of one cutoff wall in upstream and downstream side of the hydraulic structure, their length in upstream side, their spacing and number of cutoff walls under hydraulic structure. The results showed that using inclined upstream cutoff wall θ = 70° and θ = 90° was beneficial in increasing the safety the hydraulic structure against piping phenomenon and uplift pressure, respectively. Using downstream cutoff wall with any inclination angle decreased the safety against uplift pressure, and the best inclination angle of the cutoff wall at the toe of the hydraulic structure in increasing the safety against piping phenomenon was θ = 130°. Increasing the length of the upstream cutoff wall increased the safety against uplift pressure and piping phenomenon. The use of the larger spacing between two vertical cutoff walls decreased the safety against uplift pressure and increased the safety against piping phenomenon. Finally, the best number of cutoff walls in increasing the safety against uplift pressure was three and also increasing the number of cutoff walls increased the safety against piping phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abbreviations

θ:

Inclination angle between base of hydraulic structure and one cutoff wall

L:

Length of one vertical cutoff wall in upstream side of hydraulic structure

S:

Spacing between two vertical cutoff wall

N:

Number of cutoff walls under hydraulic structure

References

  • Feng Z, Wu JTH (2006) The epsilon method: analysis of seepage beneath an impervious dam with sheet pile on a layered soil. Can Geotech J 43:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geo-Slope (2007) SEEP/W Version 7.1.0 User’s manual. GEOSLOPE international. Calgary, Alberta, Canada

  • Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (1993) Seepage beneath water retaining structures founded on spatially random soil. Geotech Geo-Environ Eng ASCE 43:577–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Harr ME (1962) Groundwater and seepage. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkaniand EC, Michali AJ (1984) Steady flow calculations for cutoff wall depth variation. J Geotech Eng ASCE 110(7):899–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosla AN, Bose NK, Taylor EM (1936) Design of weirs on permeable foundations. Central Board of Irrigation, India

    Google Scholar 

  • King GJW, Collins P (1968) On the design of a rectangular dam with a central cut-off wall. Geotechnique 18:489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Singh B, Chawla A (1986) Design of structures with intermediate filters. J Hydraul Eng Div ASCE 102:206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leliavsky S (1965) Design of dams for percolation and erosion. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna MC, Bhattacharya AK, Choudhury S, Maji SC (2003) Groundwater flow beneath a sheet pile analyzed using six-noded triangular finite elements. IE (I) J 84:121–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao CX (2003) Seepage computation analysis and control. China Hydraulic and Hydropower, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton KR, Redshaw SC (1978) Seepage and groundwater flow. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedghi-Asl M, Rehmani H, Khaleghi H (2010) Laboratory investigation of the seepage control measure under coastal dikes. Exp Tech 36(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1967) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdolreza Moharrami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moharrami, A., Moradi, G., Bonab, M.H. et al. Performance of Cutoff Walls Under Hydraulic Structures Against Uplift Pressure and Piping Phenomenon. Geotech Geol Eng 33, 95–103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9827-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9827-7

Keywords

Navigation