Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Finite Element Analysis of Geogrid Encased Stone Columns

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stone columns in soft soil improve bearing capacity because they are stiffer than the material which they replace, and compacted stone columns produce shearing resistances which provide vertical support for overlying structures or embankments. Also stone columns accelerate the consolidation in the native surrounding soil and improve the load settlement characteristics of foundation. In this paper, the finite element method is utilized as a tool for carrying out analyses of stone column–soil systems under different conditions. A trial is made to improve the behaviour of stone column by encasing the stone column with geogrid as reinforcement material. The program CRISP-2D is used in the analysis of problems. The program allows prediction to be made of soil deformations considering Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for elastic–plastic soil behaviour. A parametric study is carried out to investigate the behaviour of standard and encased floating stone columns in different conditions. Different parameters were studied to show their effect on the bearing improvement and settlement reduction of the stone column. These include the length to diameter ratio (L/d), shear strength of the surrounding soil and, the area replacement ratio (as) and others. It was found that the maximum effective length to diameter (L/d) ratio is between (7–8) for Cu, between (20–40) kPa and between (10–11) for Cu = 10 kPa for ordinary floating stone columns while the effective (L/d) ratio is between (7–8) for encased floating stone columns. The increase in the area replacement ratio increases the bearing improvement ratio for encased floating stone columns especially when the area replacement ratio is greater than (0.25). The geogrid encasement of stone column greatly decreases the lateral displacement compared with ordinary stone column.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboshi H, Ichimoto E, Enoki M, Harada K (1979) The composer—a method to improve characteristics of soft clays by inclusion of large diameter sand columns. In: Proceedings international conference on soil-reinforcement. Reinforced earth and other technique, Paris, pp 211–216

  • Baraksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone columns, Federal Highway Administration Vol.1. School of Civil Engineering, Georgia Institutes of Technology, Atlanta. (www.fhwa.dot.gov)

  • Bowles JE (1996) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempfert H, Gebreselassi B (2006) Excavations and foundations in soft soils. Springer, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed QG (2008) Assessment of load capacity of reinforced stone column embedded in soft clay. M.Sc. thesis, Building and Construction Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq

  • Mitchell JK (1981) Soil improvement (State of the Art Report) General report session 12. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. Stockholm. Vol. 4, pp 509–565

  • Tanimoto K (1973) Introduction of the sand compaction pile method as applied to stabilization of soft foundation grounds. Common Wealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenzhen Ktyu Insulation Co., Ltd. (www.geogrid.biz)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Building and Construction Engineering Deptartment, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq

    Mohammed Y. Fattah

  2. Civil Engineering Department, University of Diyala, Baquba, Iraq

    Quitaba G. Majeed

Authors
  1. Mohammed Y. Fattah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quitaba G. Majeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Y. Fattah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fattah, M.Y., Majeed, Q.G. Finite Element Analysis of Geogrid Encased Stone Columns. Geotech Geol Eng 30, 713–726 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9488-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9488-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation