Skip to main content
Log in

Uplift Capacity of Single Bent Pile and Pile Group Considering Arching Effects in Sand

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 April 2010

Abstract

In this paper an analytical method has been proposed to predict the net ultimate uplift capacity of the single bent pile and pile group with a bent embedded in sand considering arching effects. Arching develops due to relative compressibility of sand relative to pile which activates the soil-pile friction. The method takes into consideration the embedded length (L), diameter of the pile (d), bent angle, surface characteristics of pile, group configuration, spacing of the pile group and the soil properties. Log spiral failure surface with parabolic arch shape was assumed in the analysis. Theoretical investigation for uplift capacity was been carried out for the single bent pile and group of pile (2 × 1, 2 × 2) embedded in sand. The variable used in the analysis were embedded length to pile diameter (L/d = 15, 20 and 25), spacing in the group (3d, 4d and 6d) and angle of bent (6°, 14° and 20°). Typical charts for evaluation of net ultimate uplift capacity for pile groups are presented through the figures. Comparison of theoretical results shows good agreement with established experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

C/C distance between pile in horizontal axis

b :

C/C distance between pile in vertical axis

C :

Shape factor

d :

Pile diameter in group

F ss :

Resisting shear force

K s :

Lateral earth pressure coefficient

K awn :

New active lateral stress ratio proposed in this study

P u :

Ultimate uplift capacity of pile

Δz :

Thickness of wedge element

B :

Width of failure surface

H :

Height of the pile group

dH :

Differential height

K awn :

Coefficient of lateral earth pressure considering arching

δ:

Friction angle of at the interface of soil and pile

γ:

Unit weight of soil

θ:

Angle of rotation of principal stresses at wall

σ1, σ3 :

Major and minor principal stress

σah :

Active lateral stress at arbitrary point on differential flat element

σahw :

Active lateral stress at wall

σvw :

Vertical stress across on differential flat element

\( \bar{\sigma }_{v} \) :

Average value of σ v over differential flat element

τ f :

Frictional resistance at the slip surface

τ w :

Frictional resistance at the interface

ψ:

Angle of inclination of failure surface

ϕ:

Internal friction angle of backfill

ω:

Angle of revolution

β:

Constant

α1,2,3,4 :

Angle of revolution

α:

Constant

X :

Radius of revolution

X a :

Radius of revolution of elementary area in x axis

X b :

Radius of revolution of elementary area in y axis

V ss :

Volume of sand inside the rupture surface of the pile group

R R :

Radius of circle of intersection of the rupture surface with the sand surface

R T :

Radius of circle produced from intersection of a tangent to the rupture surface with the horizontal plane

r 1,2,3,4 :

Radius of revolution

r 0 :

Initial radius of revolution

W ss :

Weight of the soil confined in failure surface

References

  • Basha PS (2007) Uplift capacity of single bent pile and pile group with a single bent pile in group in sand. M-Tech thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India

  • Chan SF, Hanna TH (1979) The loading behavior of initially bent large scale laboratory pile in sand. Can Geotech J 16:43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay BC, Pise PJ (1986) Uplift capacity of piles in sand. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 112(9):888–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das BM, Seeley GR (1975) Uplift capacity of buried model piles in sand. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(10):1091–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison MT, Robinson KE (1965) Bending and buckling of partially embedded piles. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on SMFE, Canada, vol 2, pp 243–246

  • Ghaly A, Hanna A (1994) Ultimate pullout resistance of single vertical anchors. Can Geotech J 31:661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy RL (1985) The arch in soil arching. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 111(3):302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen HA (1895) Versuche u¨ber getreidedruck in silozellen. Zeitschrift, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure 39: 1045–1049 (partial English translation in Proc Inst Civ Eng, 1986, 553)

  • Khan AK, Pise PJ (1997) Dynamic behavior of curved piles. Comput Struct 65:795–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft LM (1991) Performance of axially loaded pipe piles in sand. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 117(2):272–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krynine DP (1945) Discussion of stability and stiffness of cellular cofferdams by Karl Terzaghi. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 110:1175–1178

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurma Rao K (1975) Analysis of initially bent and imperfect pile. Ph.D thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India

  • Levacher DR, Sieffert JG (1984) Test on model tension piles. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 110(12):1735–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maithili TL (2006) Experimental studies on the behavior of vertically loaded pile group with a single bent pile in the group. M-Tech thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India

  • Meyerohof GG, Adams JI (1968) The ultimate uplift capacity of foundation. Can Geotech J 5(4):225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paik KH, Salgado R (2003) Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall considering arching effects. Geotechnique 53(7):643–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Paikowsky SG (1989) A static evaluation of soil plugs behavior with application to the pile plugging problem. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Rao KS, Venkatesh KH (1985) Uplift behavior of short piles in uniform sand. Soils Found 25(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker K, Basudhar PK, Patra NR (2007) Uplift capacity of pile groups embedded in sand: prediction and performance. Soils Found 46(5):633–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelke A, Patra NR (2008a) Effect of arching on uplift capacity of pile groups in sand. Int J Geomech 8(6):347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelke A, Patra NR (2008b) Effect of arching on uplift capacity of single piles. Geotech Geol Eng 27(3):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowa VA (1970) Pulling capacity of concrete cast in situ bored piles. Can Geotech J 7:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subhra G (2006) Studies on some behavior in soil structure interaction problem. M-Tech thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

  • Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vesic AS (1970) Test on instrumented piles, Ogeechee River Site. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 96(2):561–584

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Shelke.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9322-8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shelke, A., Mishra, S. Uplift Capacity of Single Bent Pile and Pile Group Considering Arching Effects in Sand. Geotech Geol Eng 28, 337–347 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9295-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9295-7

Keywords

Navigation