Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of reducing the systematic error due to non-linearity in N2O flux measurements by static chambers

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 31 October 2008

Abstract

Closed (non-steady state) chamber measurements are often used to determine the gas exchange of N2O. Many researchers have addressed the underestimation of the emission estimates obtained from closed chamber measurements when using linear regression methods. However, the linear regression method is still usually applied to derive the flux. The importance of using non-linear regression methods is demonstrated with data from four fertilizing events each consisting of 1 month of automatic chamber measurements at Cabauw in the Netherlands in the period from July 2005 to July 2006. It is presented that the cumulative emission estimates with the exponential regression method are close to the cumulative emissions estimates with the intercept method. The linear estimates differ by up to 60% of the estimates with the exponential method. The performance of each method is validated using a C2H6 tracer and a goodness-of-fit analysis. The goodness-of-fit is much better for the exponential than the linear regression method. The systematic error due to linear regression is of the same order as the estimated uncertainty due to temporal variation. Therefore, closed-chamber data should be tested for non-linearity and an appropriate method should be used to calculate the flux.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony WH, Hutchinson GL, Livingston GP (1995) Chamber measurement of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: linear vs. diffusion-based flux models. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1308–1310

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beljaars ACM, Bosveld FC (1996) Cabauw data for the validation of land surface parameterization schemes. J Clim 10:1172–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bothe H, Ferguson SJ, Newton WE (2007) Biology of the nitrogen cycle. Elsevier, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick DR, Pain BF, Brookman SKE (2000) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions following application of animal manures to grassland. J Environ Qual 29:277–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C (1997) Statistics for technology: a course in applied statistics. Chapman & Hall, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen S (1983) Nitrous oxide emission from a soil under permanent grass: seasonal and diurnal fluctuations as influenced by manuring and fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 15:531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton H, Arah JRM, Smith KA (1994) Measurement of nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized grassland using closed chambers. J Geophys Res 99:16599–16607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conen F, Smith KA (2000) An explanation of linear increase in gas concentration under closed chamber used to measure gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere. Eur J Soil Sci 51:111–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (1981) Atmospheric chemical processes of the oxides of nitrogen, including nitrous oxide. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Savage K, Verschot LV et al (2002) Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber-bases measurements of soil respiration. Agric For Meteorol 113:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mello WZ, Hines ME (1994) Application of static and dynamic enclosures for determining dimethyl sulfide and carbonyl sulfide exchange in Spagnum peatlands: implications for the magnitude and direction of the flux. J Geophys Res 99:14601–14607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichner MJ (1990) Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized soils: summary of available data. J Environ Qual 19:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flechard CR, Ambus P, Skiba U et al (2007) Effects of climate and management intensity on nitrous oxide emissions in grassland systems across Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:135–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Yates SR (1998) Laboratory study of closed and dynamic flux chambers: experimental results and implications for field application. J Geophys Res 103:26115–26125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen S, Maehlum JE, Bakken LR (1993) N2O and CH4 fluxes in soil influenced by fertilization and tractor traffic. Soil Biol Biochem 25:621–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Healy RW, Striegl RG, Russell TF et al (1996) Numerical evaluation of static-chamber measurements of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: identification of physical processes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:740–747

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks DMD, Huissteden J, Dolman AJ (2007) The full greenhouse gas balance of an abandoned peat meadow. Biogeosciences 4:411–424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GL, Mosier AR (1981) Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:311–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC Climate change 2001 (2001) The scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC Climate change 1995 (2006) Scientific and technical analyses of impacts, adaptations and mitigation. Contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climatic change. Cambridge University Press, London

  • Jager CJ, Nakken TC, Palland CL (1976) Bodemkundig onderzoek van twee graslandpercelen nabij Cabauw (in Dutch). NV Heidemaatschappij Beheer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroon PS, Hensen A, Jonker HJJ et al (2007) Suitability of quantum cascade laser spectroscopy for CH4 and N2O eddy covariance flux measurements. Biogeosciences 4:715–728

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutzbach L, Schneider J, Sachs T et al (2007) CO2 flux determination by closed-chamber methods can be seriously biased by inappropriate application of linear regression. Biogeosciences 4:1005–1025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laville P, Jambert C, Cellier P et al (1999) Nitrous oxide fluxes from a fertilized maize crop using micrometeorological and chamber methods. Agric For Meteorol 96:19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston GP, Hutchinson GL, Spartalian K (2005) Diffusion theory improves chamber-based measurement trace gas emission. Geophys Res Lett 32:L24817, doi:10.1029/2005GL024744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston GP, Hutchinson GL, Spartalian K (2006) Trace gas emission in chambers: a non-steady state diffusion model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1459–1469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson AR, Petersen SO, Vinther FP (2001) Stochastic diffusion model for estimating trace gas emissions with static chambers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Piphlatie M, Rinne J, Ambus P et al (2005) Nitrous oxide emissions from a beech forest Floor measured by eddy covariance and soil enclosure techniques. Biogeosciences 2:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruser R, Flessa H, Schilling R et al (1998) Soil compaction and fertilization effects on nitrous oxide and methane fluxes in potato fields. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:1587–1595

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veenendaal EM, Kolle O, Leffelaar P et al (2007) Land use dependent CO2 exchange and carbon balance in two grassland sites on eutropic drained peat soils. Biogeosciences 4:1027–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was part of the CarboEurope project and the Dutch BSIK program. We thank our colleagues P. Fonteijn, T. Schrijver and H. van ‘t Veen for their assistance during setting-up these experiments. We are also very grateful to E. de Beus of Technical University of Delft and G. Pieterse of University of Utrecht for their assistance in data analyses. D. Hendriks of University of Amsterdam and A. Schrier-Uijl of University of Wageningen are acknowledged for the discussions. Finally, we owe a special debt of gratitude to the KNMI and the farmer T. van Eyk for using their sites.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. S. Kroon.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9224-9

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kroon, P.S., Hensen, A., van den Bulk, W.C.M. et al. The importance of reducing the systematic error due to non-linearity in N2O flux measurements by static chambers. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 82, 175–186 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9179-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9179-x

Keywords

Navigation