Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlating fracture toughness and fracture surface roughness via correlation length scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracture toughness of a material depends on its microstructure and the imposed loading conditions. Intuitively, the resultant fracture surfaces must contain the information about the interlacing of these intrinsic (microstructure) and extrinsic (imposed loading) characteristics. Mandelbrot’s revelation that fracture surfaces are fractals, excited both the scientific and engineering communities, spurring a series of works focused at correlating the fracture toughness and the fracture surface roughness. Unfortunately, these studies remained inconclusive and later on it was shown that the fractal dimension of the fracture surface roughness is in fact universal. Here, we show that by going beyond the universality, a definite correlation between the fracture toughness and indices of the fracture surface roughness is obtained. To this end, fracture experiments on an aluminum alloy were carried over a wide range of loading rates (\(10^{-2}\)\(10^{6}\,\mathrm{MPa}\sqrt{\mathrm{m}}\mathrm{s}^{-1}\)), and the resulting fracture surface were reconstructed using stereography. The correlation lengths, extracted from the reconstructed surfaces, were found to be linearly correlated with the measured fracture toughness. The correlation unraveled in our work, along with the proposed mechanistic interpretation, revives the hope of correlating fracture toughness and fracture surface roughness, allowing quantitative failure analysis and a potential reconstructive approaches to designing fracture resistant materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASM Metals Handbook (1987) Fractography. vol 12. ASM International Metals Park, Ohio, USA

  • Bonamy D, Bouchaud E (2011) Failure of heterogeneous materials: a dynamic phase transition? Phys Rep 498:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonamy D, Ponson L, Prades S, Bouchaud E, Guillot C (2006) Scaling exponents for fracture surfaces in homogeneous glass and glassy ceramics. Phys Rev Lett 97:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchaud E (1990) Fractal dimension of fractured surfaces : a universal value? Fractal Dimens Eur Phys Lett 13:73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchaud E (1997) Scaling properties of cracks. J Phys Condens Matter 9:4319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchbinder E, Mathiesen J, Procaccia I (2004) Roughening of fracture surfaces: the role of plastic deformation. Phys Rev Lett 92:245505–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broberg KB (1979) On the behaviour of the process region at a fast running crack tip. In: Kawata K, Shioiri J (eds) High velocity deformation of solids. Springer, Berlin, pp 182–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carney LR, Mecholsky JJJ (2013) Relationship between fracture toughness and fracture surface fractal dimension in AISI 4340 steel. Mater Sci Appl 4:258–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Charkaluk E, Bigerelle M, Iost A (1998) Fractals and fracture. Eng Fract Mech 61:119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherepanov GP, Balankin AS, Ivanova VS (1995) Fractal fracture mechanics—a review. Eng Fract Mech 51:997–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks J, Marsh B, Turchetta R, Taylor K, Chan W, Lahav A, Fenigstein A (2013) Kirana: a solid-state megapixel uCMOS image sensor for ultrahigh speed imaging. In: Sensors, cameras, and systems for industrial and scientific applications XIV, p 865903

  • Dauskardt RH, Haubensak F, Ritchie RO (1990) On the interpretation of the fractal character of fracture surfaces. Acta Metall Mater 38:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DL (1989) Fracture surface roughness as a gauge of fracture toughness: Al-particulate SiC Composites. J Mater Sci 24:681–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RL, Ortiz M, Carter EA (2004) Universal binding-energy relation for crystals that accounts for surface relaxation. Phys Rev B 69:172104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa M, Aldaco J (2002) Self-affine fracture surface parameters and their relationship with microstructure in a cast aluminum alloy. J Mater Res 17:1276–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa M, Bouchaud E, Nghiem B (1998) Long distance roughness of fracture surfaces in heterogeneous materials. MRS Proc 539:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa M, Aldaco J, Ortiz U, González V (2000) Roughness exponent of the fracture surface of an Al–Si alloy. Alum Trans 3:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa M, Reyes-melo E, Guerra C, González V, Ortiz U (2008) Scaling properties of slow fracture in glass: from deterministic to irregular topography. Int J Fract 151:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautridou JC, Pineau A (1981) Crack initiation and stable crack growth resistance in A508 steels in relation to inclusion distribution. Eng Fract Mech 15:55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB, Passoja DE, Paullay AJ (1984) Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals. Nature 308:721–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mecholsky JJ, Passoja DE, Feinberg-Ringel KS (1989) Quantitative analysis of brittle fracture surfaces using fractal geometry. J Am Ceram Soc 72:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osovski S, Srivastava A, Ponson L, Bouchaud E, Tvergaard V, Ravi-Chandar K, Needleman A (2015) The effect of loading rate on ductile fracturetoughness and fracture surface roughness. J Mech Phys Solids 76:20–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen D, Zhuang S, RosakisA Ravichandran G (1998) Experimental determination of dynamic crackinitiation and propagation fracture toughness in thin aluminumsheets. Int J Fract 90:153–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineau A, Benzerga AA, Pardoen T (2016) Acta materialia failure of metals I: brittle and ductile fracture. Acta Mater 107:424–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineau A, McDowell DL, Busso EP, Antolovich SD (2016) Failure of metals II: Fatigue. Acta Materialia 107:484–507

  • Ramanathan S, Ertas D, Fisher DS (1997) Quasistatic crack propagation in heterogeneous media. Phys Rev Lett 79:873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by Notches and Cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih CF (1981) Relationships between the J-integral and the crackopeningdisplacement for stationary and extending cracks. J Mech Phys Solids 29:305–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava A, Ponson L, Osovski S, BouchaudE Tvergaard V, Needleman A (2014) Effect of inclusion density onductile fracture toughness and roughness. J Mech Phys Solids 63:62–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava A, Osovski S, Needleman A (2017) Engineering the crack path by controlling the microstructure. J Mech Phys Solids 100:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood EE, Banerji K (1986) Fractals infractography. Mater Sci Eng 80:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ven A, Ceder G (2004) Thethermodynamics of decohesion. Acta Mater 52:1223–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZG, Chen DL, Jiang XX, Ai SH, Shih CH (1988) Relationship between fractal dimension and fatigue threshold value in dual-phase steels. Scr Metall 22:827–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Alan Needleman of Texas A&M University and Dr. Daniel Rittel of Technion – Israel Institute of Technology for helpful and stimulating discussions. The financial support provided by the Pazy foundation Young Researchers Award (Grant No. 1176) and European Union’s Horizon2020 Program (Excellent Science, Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Actions, H2020 - MSCA - RISE - 2017) under REA grant agreement 777896 (Project QUANTIFY)is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Osovski.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barak, Y., Srivastava, A. & Osovski, S. Correlating fracture toughness and fracture surface roughness via correlation length scale. Int J Fract 219, 19–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00377-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00377-7

Keywords

Navigation