Abstract
Points of view are a central phenomenon in human cognition. Although the concept of point of view is ambiguous, there exist common elements in different notions. A point of view is a certain way to look at things around us. In conceptual points of view, things are looked at or interpreted through conceptual lenses. Conceptual points of view are important for epistemology, cognitive science, and philosophy of science. In this article, a new method to formalize conceptual points of view is introduced. It is based on the conceptual space approach, where concepts are regions of multi-dimensional quality spaces. Points of view, as defined in this article, consist of a selection of relevant dimensions, referred to here as determinables, and of a certain supposition, referred to here as a theory, about the subject content. After considering some early efforts to formalize points of view, the notion of conceptual space is defined and explored. One concept of point of view is defined and developed in the framework of conceptual space, and a new logic for points of view is also outlined. The problem of mind–body correlation is discussed as an example of the application of the notion of points of view. To conclude, the meaning and applications of the new concepts and tools developed in the article are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baier, K. (1958). Moral point of view. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1981). Situations and attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 668–691.
Brandom, R. (1982). Points of view and practical reasoning. Candian Journal of Philosophy, 12, 321–333.
Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy. Vol. 3. Ontology I: The furniture of the world. Dordrecht-Holland/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Charro, F., & Colomina, J. J. (2013). Points of view beyond models: Towards a formal approach to points of view as access to the world. Foundations of Science. Published online 05 Feb 2013.
Clark, A. (1993). Sensory qualities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Colomina, J. J. (2012). The feasibility of determinables and its relation to scientific image. In C. M. Vidal, J. L. Falguera, J. M. Sagüillo, V. M. Verdejo, & M. Pereira-Fariña (Eds.), Proceedings of the VII conference of the Spanish society for logic, methodology and philosophy of science; Actas del VII Congreso de la Sociedad de Lógica, Metodología y Filosofía de la Ciencia en España (pp. 382–388). Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Conant, J. (2005). The dialect of perspectivism, 1. Nordic Journal of Philosophy, 6(2), 5–50.
Douven, I., Decock, L., Dietz, R., & Égré, P. (2013). Vagueness: A Conceptual spaces approach. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42, 137–160.
Duzí, M., Jespersen, B., & Materna, P. (2006). Points of view from a logical perspective (1). Organon, F, 13(3), 277–305.
Duzí, M., Jespersen, B., & Materna, P. (2007). Points of view from a logical perspective (2). Organon, F, 14(1), 5–31.
Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific perspectivism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, K., Roeder, T., Gupta, D., & Perkins, C. (2001). Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Information Retrieval, 4(2), 1386–4564.
Goodman, N. (1978). The ways of worldmaking. Sussex: The Harvester Press.
Gärdenfors, P. (1990). Induction, conceptual spaces and AI. Philosophy of Science, 57, 78–95.
Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: On the geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gärdenfors, P., & Zenker, F. (2015). Communication, rationality, and conceptual changes in scientific theories. In P. Gärdenfors, & F. Zenker (Eds.), Conceptual spaces at work. Berlin: Springer.
Halmos, P. R. (1960). Naive set theory. London: D. Van Nostrand Company.
Hautamäki, A. (1983a). Scientific change and intensional logic. Philosophica, 32(2), 25–42.
Hautamäki, A. (1983b). The logic of viewpoints. Studia Logica XLII, 2(3), 187–196.
Hautamäki, A. (1986). Points of view and their logical analysis. Acta Philosophica Fennica (Helsinki), 41.
Hautamäki, A. (1992). A conceptual space approach to semantic networks. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23(6–9), 517–525. Published also in F. Lehmann (Ed.), Semantic networks in artificial intelligence (pp. 517–525). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Holliday, W. H., & Perry, J. (Forthcoming). Roles, rigidity, and quantification in epistemic logic. In A. Baltag, & S. Smets (Eds.), Trends in logic, Outstanding contributions: Johan F. A. K. van Benthem on logical and informational dynamics. Berlin: Springer.
Jacquette, D. (Ed.). (2006). A companion to philosophical logic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Johnson, W. (1964). Logic, Part I, (orig. 1921) and Part II (orig. 1922). Dover: New York.
Kaipainen, M., & Hautamäki, A. (2011). Epistemic pluralism and multi-perspective knowledge organization, explorative conceptualization of topical content domains. Knowledge Organization, 38(6), 503–514.
Kaipainen, M., & Hautamäki, A. (2015). A perspectivist approach to conceptual spaces. In P. Gärdenfors, & F.Zenker (Eds.), Conceptual spaces at work. Berlin: Springer.
Kaipainen, M., Normak, P., Niglas, K., Kippar, J., & Laanpere, M. (2008). Soft ontologies, spatial representation, and multi-perspective explorability. Expert Systems, 25(5), 474–483.
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise of probability. London: Macmillan and Co.
Knuuttila, T., & Loettgers, A. (2014). Magnets, spins, and neurons: The dissemination of model templates across disciplines. Monist, 97(3), 280–300.
Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 59–69.
Krusal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Liz, M. (2014). Models and points of view: The analysis of the notion of point of view. Model-based reasoning in science and technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 8, 109–128.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moline, J. (1968). On points of view. American Philosophical Quarterly, 5, 191–198.
Moore, A. (1997). Points of view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moravcík, A. (2005). Conceptual spaces with weighted prototypes. An application to categorization. Diploma Thesis. Comenius University Bratislava.
Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos. Why the materialist Neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. http://www.pnas.org/content/100/19/11163.long. Accessed April 8, 2014.
Poli, R. (2004). W. E. Johnson’s determinable-determinate opposition and his theory of abstraction. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 82(1), 163–196.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prior, A. (1948). Determinables, determinates and determinants, I and II. Mind, 58, 1–20 and 178–194.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1970). Methods of logic (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Quine, W. V. O. (1987). Quiddities: An intermittently philosophical dictionary. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. (1959). Determinables and the notion of resemblance. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, (Supplementary vol. 33, pp. 141–158).
Stalnaker, R. C. (1979). Anti-essentialism. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy, IV studies in metaphysics (pp. 343–355). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stegmüller, W. (1979). The structuralist view of theories. Berlin: Springer.
Steinbach, M., Ertöz, L., & Kumar, V. (2004). The challenges of clustering high dimensional data. In L. T. Wille (Ed.), New direction in statistical physics (pp. 273–309). Berlin & Heildeberg: Springer.
Suppe, P. (Ed.). (1974). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
Tuomela, R. (1973). Theoretical concepts. Wien, New York: Springer.
Van Fraassen, B. (1967). Meaning relations among predicates. Noûs, 1, 161–179.
Van Fraassen, B. (1969). Meaning relations and modalities. Noûs, 3, 155–167.
Van Fraassen, B. (1973). Extension, intension, and comprehension. In M. K. Munitz (Ed.), Logic and ontology (pp. 101–131). New York: New York University Press.
Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vázquez, M., & Liz, M. (2011). Models as points of view: The case of system dynamics. Foundations of Science, 16(4), 383–391.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Ph.D. student Anis Boubaker, assistant professor Juan Colomina, professor Mauri Kaipainen, and professor Manuel Liz for their comments to an earlier version of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hautamäki, A. Points of View: A Conceptual Space Approach. Found Sci 21, 493–510 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9422-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9422-2