Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The profit maximizing liner shipping problem with flexible frequencies: logistical and environmental considerations

  • Published:
Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on liner shipping includes many models on containership speed optimization, fleet deployment, fleet size and mix, network design and other problem variants and combinations. Many of these models, and in fact most models at the tactical planning level, assume a fixed revenue for the ship operator and as a result they typically minimize costs. This treatment does not capture a fundamental characteristic of shipping market behavior, that ships tend to speed up in periods of high freight rates and slow down in depressed market conditions. This paper develops a simple model for a fixed route scenario which, among other things, incorporates the influence of freight rates, along with that of fuel prices and cargo inventory costs into the overall decision process. The objective to be maximized is the line’s average daily profit. Departing from convention, the model is also able to consider flexible service frequencies, to be selected from a broader set than the standard assumption of one call per week. It is shown that this may lead to better solutions and that the cost of forcing a fixed frequency can be significant. Such cost is attributed either to additional fuel cost if the fleet is forced to sail faster to accommodate a frequency that is higher than the optimal one, or to lost income if the opposite is the case. The impact of the line’s decisions on CO2 emissions is also examined and illustrative runs of the model are made on three existing services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source FMC (2012)

Fig. 3

Source FMC (2012)

Fig. 4

Adapted from UNCTAD (2016), Table 1.7

Fig. 5

Adapted from UNCTAD (2016), Fig. 1.7

Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alphaliner (2011) Alphaliner weekly newsletter. http://www.alphaliner.com

  • Alvarez J (2009) Joint routing and deployment of a fleet of container vessels. Marit Econ Logist 11:186–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouer BD, Karsten CV, Pisinger D (2017) Optimization in liner shipping. 4OR-Q J Oper Res 15:1–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug Ø, Corbett JJ, Endresen Ø, Eyring V, Faber J, Hanayama S, Lee DS, Lee D, Lindstad H, Markowska AZ, Mjelde A, Nelissen D, Nilsen J, Pålsson C, Winebrake JJ, Wu WQ, Yoshida K (2009) Second IMO GHG study 2009. IMO document MEPC59/INF.10

  • Cariou P (2011) Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping? Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 16(3):260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Nygreen B, Ronen D (2007) Maritime Transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds) Handbook in OR & MS, vol 14. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Devanney JW (2011) Speed limits vs slow steaming. Center for tankship excellence report. http://www.c4tx.org

  • Doudnikoff M, Lacoste R (2014) Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in sulphur emission control areas. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 27:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewry (2015) Ship operating costs annual review and forecast 2014/2015. Drewry Maritime Research, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eefsen T, Cerup-Simonsen B (2010) Speed, carbon emissions and supply chain in container shipping. In: Proceedings of the annual conference of the international association of maritime economists, IAME 2010. Lisbon, Portugal, July

  • Equasis (2015) The world merchant fleet in 2015, Equasis

  • FMC (2012) Study of the 2008 repeal of the liner conference exemption from European Union competition law, Bureau of trade analysis. Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Guericke S, Tierney K (2015) Liner shipping cargo allocation with service levels and speed optimization. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 84:40–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsten CV, Brouer BD, Pisinger D (2017) Competitive liner shipping network design. Comput Oper Res 87:125–136

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lang N, Veenstra A (2010) A quantitative analysis of container vessel arrival planning strategies. OR Spectr 32:477–499

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Magirou EF, Psaraftis HN, Bouritas T (2015) The economic speed of an oceangoing vessel in a dynamic setting. Transp Res Part B 76:48–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Wang S (2011) Optimal operating strategy for a long-haul liner service route. Eur J Oper Res 215:105–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Wang S, Andersson H, Thun K (2014) Containership routing and scheduling in liner shipping: overview and future research directions. Transp Sci 48(2):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE, Vernimmen B (2010) The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. J Transp Geogr 17:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaraftis HN (2012) Market based measures for green house gas emissions from ships: a review. WMU J Marit Aff 11:211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaraftis HN, Kontovas CA (2013) Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: a taxonomy and survey. Transp Res Part C 26:331–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi X, Song D-P (2012) Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 48(4):863–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt LB, Plum CEM, Pisinger D, Sigurd MM, Vial GTP (2016) The liner shipping berth scheduling problem with transit times. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 86:116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronen D (1982) The effect of oil price on the optimal speed of ships. J Oper Res Soc 33:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TWP, Jalkanen JP, Anderson BA, Corbett JJ, Faber J, Hanayama S, O’Keeffe E, Parker S, Johansson L, Aldous L, Raucci C, Traut M, Ettinger S, Nelissen D, Lee DS, Ng S, Agrawal A, Winebrake JJ, Hoen M, Chesworth S, Pandey A (2014) Third IMO GHG study 2014. International Maritime Organization IMO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Song D-P, Li D, Drake P (2017) Multi-objective optimization for a liner shipping service from different perspectives. Transp Res Proced 25:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2016) Review of maritime transport 2016. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development United Nations, New York

  • Wang S, Meng Q (2012) Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 48(3):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Li KX, Ma H, Xu Z (2015) Joint planning of fleet deployment, speed optimization, and cargo allocation for liner shipping. Transp Sci 49(4):922–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Z, Ng SH, Lee LH (2012) A study on bunker fuel management for the shipping liner services. Comput Oper Res 39(5):1160–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zis T, North RJ, Angeloudis P, Ochieng WY, Bell MG (2015) Environmental balance of shipping emissions reduction strategies. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2479:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Jan Hoffmann of UNCTAD and Mr. Dimitrios Vastarouchas of the Danaos Corporation for their assistance in the data collection part of this work. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their comments on two previous versions of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harilaos N. Psaraftis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giovannini, M., Psaraftis, H.N. The profit maximizing liner shipping problem with flexible frequencies: logistical and environmental considerations. Flex Serv Manuf J 31, 567–597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-018-9308-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-018-9308-z

Keywords

Navigation