Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory evaluation of a walleye (Sander vitreus) bioenergetics model

  • Published:
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Walleye (Sander vitreus) is an important game fish throughout much of North America. We evaluated the performance of the Wisconsin bioenergetics model for walleye in the laboratory. Walleyes were fed rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in four laboratory tanks during a 126-day experiment. Based on a statistical comparison of bioenergetics model predictions of monthly consumption with the observed monthly consumption, we concluded that the bioenergetics model significantly underestimated food consumption by walleye in the laboratory. The degree of underestimation appeared to depend on the feeding rate. For the tank with the lowest feeding rate (1.4% of walleye body weight per day), the agreement between the bioenergetics model prediction of cumulative consumption over the entire 126-day experiment and the observed cumulative consumption was remarkably close, as the prediction was within 0.1% of the observed cumulative consumption. Feeding rates in the other three tanks ranged from 1.6% to 1.7% of walleye body weight per day, and bioenergetics model predictions of cumulative consumption over the 126-day experiment ranged between 11 and 15% less than the observed cumulative consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajer PG, Whitledge GW, Hayward RS, Zweifel RD (2003) Laboratory evaluation of two bioenergetics models applied to yellow perch: identification of a major source of systematic error. J Fish Biol 62:436–454. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00040.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt SB, Hartman KJ (1993) Innovative approaches with bioenergetics models: future applications to fish ecology and management. Trans Am Fish Soc 122:731–735. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1993)122<0731:IAWBMF>2.3.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttner JK, Kirby J (1986) Response of zooplankton and walleye fry to cladoceran inoculation and fertilization of earthen ponds. N Y Fish Game J 33:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen JS, Jobling M (1990) The behaviour and the relationship between food intake and growth of juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus L., subjected to sustained exercise. Can J Zool 68:2185–2191. doi:10.1139/z90-303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhouse DW, Bur MT, Cornelius FC et al (1999) Consumption of rainbow smelt by walleye and salmonine fishes in eastern Lake Erie. In: Munawar M, Edsall T, Munawar IF (eds) State of Lake Erie—past, present and future. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 291–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Forney JL (1980) Evolution of a management strategy for the walleye in Oneida Lake, New York. N Y Fish Game J 27:105–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MJ, Boisclair D, Brandt SB et al (1993) Applications of bioenergetics models in fish ecology and management: where do we go from here? Trans Am Fish Soc 122:1019–1030. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1993)122<1019:AOBMTF>2.3.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PC, Johnson TB, Schindler DE, Kitchell JF (1997) Fish bioenergetics 3.0. University of Wisconsin, Sea Grant Institute, WISCU-T-97-001, Madison

  • Hartman KJ, Margraf FJ (1992) Effects of prey and predator abundances on prey consumption and growth of walleyes in western Lake Erie. Trans Am Fish Soc 121:245–260. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1992)121<0245:EOPAPA>2.3.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber AB (1983) Two methods for evaluating fingerling walleye stocking success and natural year-class densities in Seven Island Lake, Wisconsin, 1977–1981. N Am J Fish Manag 3:152–155. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1983)3<152:TMFEFW>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward RS, Margraf FJ (1987) Eutrophication effects on prey size and food available to yellow perch in Lake Erie. Trans Am Fish Soc 116:210–223. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116<210:EEOPSA>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson BA, Nepszy SJ (1994) Reproductive tactics of walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) in Lake Erie. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:986–997. doi:10.1139/f94-099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokanson KEF (1977) Temperature requirements of some percids and adaptations to the seasonal temperature cycle. J Fish Res Board Can 34:1524–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Hushak LJ, Morse GW, Apraku KK (1986) Regional impacts of fishery allocation to sport and commercial interests: a case study of Ohio’s portion of Lake Erie. N Am J Fish Manag 6:472–480. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1986)6<472:RIOFAT>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BM, Luecke C, Stewart RS, Staggs MD, Gilbert SJ, Kitchell JF (1992) Forecasting effects of harvest regulations and stocking of walleyes on prey fish communities in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. N Am J Fish Manage 12:797–807. doi :10.1577/1548-8675(1992)012<0797:FEOHRA>2.3.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchell JF, Stewart DJ, Weininger D (1977) Applications of a bioenergetics model to yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and walleye (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). J Fish Res Board Can 34:1922–1935

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantry BF, Rudstam LG, Forney JL et al (2008) Comparisons between consumption estimates from bioenergetics simulations and field measurements for walleye from Oneida Lake, New York. Trans Am Fish Soc 137:1406–1421. doi:10.1577/T07-051.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madenjian CP, O’Connor DV (1999) Laboratory evaluation of a lake trout bioenergetics model. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:802–814. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1999)128<0802:LEOALT>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madenjian CP, DeSorcie TJ, Stedman RM (1998) Ontogenic and spatial patterns in diet and growth of lake trout in Lake Michigan. Trans Am Fish Soc 127:236–252. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127<0236:OASPID>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madenjian CP, O’Connor DV, Nortrup DA (2000) A new approach toward evaluation of fish bioenergetics models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1025–1032. doi:10.1139/cjfas-57-5-1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madenjian CP, O’Connor DV, Chernyak SM, Rediske RR, O’Keefe JP (2004) Evaluation of a chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) bioenergetics model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:627–635. doi:10.1139/f04-033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madenjian CP, O’Connor DV, Pothoven SA et al (2006) Evaluation of a lake whitefish bioenergetics model. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:61–75. doi:10.1577/T04-215.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1983) Applied linear regression models. Irwin, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Ney JJ (1993) Bioenergetics modeling today: growing pains on the cutting edge. Trans Am Fish Soc 122:736–748. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1993)122<0736:BMTGPO>2.3.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothoven SA, Madenjian CP (2008) Changes in consumption by alewives and lake whitefish after dreissenid mussel invasions in Lakes Michigan and Huron. N Am J Fish Manag 28:308–320. doi:10.1577/M07-022.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer JS, Haas RC, Diana JS, Breck JE (1999) Field test of two energetic models for yellow perch. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:414–435. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1999)128<0414:FTOTEM>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 184, Ottawa

  • Stewart DJ, Kitchell JF, Crowder LB (1981) Forage fishes and their salmonid predators in Lake Michigan. Trans Am Fish Soc 110:751–763. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1981)110<751:FFATSP>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson JT, Knight RL (2001) Response of yellow perch to changes in the benthic invertebrate community of western Lake Erie. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:766–782. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<0766:ROYPTC>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitledge GW, Hayward RS (1997) Laboratory evaluation of a bioenergetics model for largemouth bass at two temperatures and feeding levels. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:1030–1035. doi :10.1577/1548-8659(1997)126<1030:LEOABM>2.3.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Breck and the Institute for Fisheries Research for supplying the walleye fingerlings. We are grateful to Omstead Foods Limited (Ontario, Canada) for providing the rainbow smelt used in the laboratory experiment. We also thank L. Begnoche, M. Chriscinske, G. Cummins, and K. Tecco for assisting with the experiment, T. Miller and S. Constant for measuring water velocities, and J. Breck, P. Kocovsky, J. Savino, and M. Stapanian for their helpful reviews of the manuscript. This article is Contribution 1505 of the USGS Great Lakes Science Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles P. Madenjian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madenjian, C.P., Wang, C., O’Brien, T.P. et al. Laboratory evaluation of a walleye (Sander vitreus) bioenergetics model. Fish Physiol Biochem 36, 45–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-008-9278-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-008-9278-2

Keywords

Navigation