Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards the use of Remote Sensing for Identification of Building Damage, Destruction, and Defensive Actions at Wildland-Urban Interface Fires

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post-fire remote sensing provides a promising tool for assessing building damage, destruction, and defensive actions from wildland fire. However, limited studies exist to guide image acquisitions. Consequently, we compare remotely piloted aircraft systems and satellite post-fire imagery to ground-based assessments from the 2017 California Tubbs Fire to classify building damage, destruction, and defensive actions in an intermix and interface community. We also geolocate defensive action information from active fire images, videos, and eyewitness accounts. We utilize both manual and object-based classification approaches. Both types of overhead imagery using manual classifications had high kappa statistics ranging from 0.81 to 0.96, indicating almost perfect agreement with ground-based assessments for primary building destruction (e.g., homes). Object-based classifications of destruction had kappa statistics ranging from 0.63 to 0.88 for primary buildings, indicating substantial agreement. Additionally, manual and object-based classifications identified many destroyed secondary buildings (e.g., sheds) missed by ground-based assessments. Occlusions due to canopy cover contribute to lower classification results in the intermix community. All imagery missed significant damage identified in the ground-based assessment. Remotely piloted aircraft systems imagery was superior to satellite imagery in identifying defensive action indicators. Nonetheless, all image types are valuable additions to ground-based assessments of damage, destruction, and defensive actions. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of accounting for defensive actions in assessing building response at wildland-urban interface fires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data used to support this paper is publicly available via the references included in the paper.

References

  1. Maranghides A, Link E, Mell W, Hawks M, Wilson M, Brewer W, C Brown, B Vihnaneck, W Walton (2021) A Case study of the camp fire – fire progression timeline. National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 2135. (Gaithersburg, MD) . doi: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2135

  2. Herbert N (2020) Hold & improve: balancing risk to fight fire during a pandemic. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Wildland Fire. https://www.doi.gov/wildlandfire/hold-improve-balancing-risk-fight-fire-during-pandemic Accessed 16 Aug 2020

  3. CAL FIRE, (2017) California Natural Resources Agency, California Geological Survey, State of California Department of Water Resources, California Office of Emergency Services, California Water Boards, United States Geologic Survey, United States Forest Service (2017) Tubbs fire Watershed emergency response team final report. CA-LNU-01010

  4. SonomaMap, (2017) 2017 Post-Fire Damage Assessment. https://services1.arcgis.com/P5Mv5GY5S66M8Z1Q/arcgis/rest/services/DmgAsmtSoCoFiresOct2017/FeatureServer. Accessed 26 May 2020

  5. CAL FIRE 2020 Tubbs fire (central LNU complex) https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2017/10/8/tubbs-fire-central-lnu-complex/ Accessed 26 May 2020

  6. Sonoma County Emergency Operations Center (2018) Emergency operations center after action report, community alert & warning program assessment and emergency management program assessment. http://sonoma-county.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=945&meta_id=244351

  7. Maranghides, A, McNamara D, Vihnanek R, Restaino J, Leland C (2015) A case study of a community affected by the Waldo Fire – Event timeline and defensive actions. National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1910. (Gaithersburg, MD) .doi: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1910

  8. McNamara D, Mell W, Maranghides A (2020) Object-based post-fire aerial image classification for building damage, destruction and defensive actions at the 2012 Colorado Waldo Canyon Fire. Int J Wildland Fire 29:174–189. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuckman M (2020) High resolution post fire imagery (Vexcel, 10/16 to 10/18). https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=e58a9c2685e1479a83595b594722a206 Accessed 18 Aug 2020

  10. Goodman P, (2017) 2 cm drone imagery of damage to Coffey Park and Joruney's End in Santa Rosa. https://blog.mapbox.com/2-cm-drone-imagery-of-damage-to-coffey-park-and-journeys-end-in-santa-rosa-861cd64953df. Imagery Collected by Sonoma County and Alameda County Sheriiff's Office through Drone Scholars: https://dronescholars.com/. Map Image Service:

  11. MAXAR, 2017. Post-Even: Santa Rosa Wildfires. License: https://www.digitalglobe.com/ecosystem/open-data/santa-rosa-wildfires.

  12. Blanchi R, Leonard J (2008) Property safety: Judging structural safety. In 'Community Bushfire Safety’, Handmer J, Haynes K Bushfire Co-operative Research Centre, Melbourne pp. 77–85

  13. Maranghides A, Mell W (2011) A case study of a community affected by the Witch and Guejito wildland fires. Fire Technol 47:379–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0164-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Whittaker J, Haynes K, Handmer J, McLennan J (2013) Community safety during the 2009 Australian’ Black Saturday’ bushfires: an analysis of household preparedness and response. Int J Wildland Fire 22:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maranghides A, McNamara D (2016) 2011 Wildland-Urban Interface Amarillo fires report #2 – assessment of fire behavior and WUI measurement science. National Institute of Standards and Technology Technical Note 1909. (Gaithersburg, MD) . doi: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1909

  16. Maranghides A, Mell W, Ridenour K (2014) Initial reconnaissance of the 2011 wildland-urban interface fires in Amarillo, Texas. Fire Technol 50:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-012-0287-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (2017) Fire assessment tool. Available: http://firemap.rmbwb.ca. Accessed 28 Aug 2020

  18. Ahmed MR, Rahaman KR, Hassan QK (2018) Remote sensing of wildland fire-induced risk assessment at the community level. Sensors 18: 1570. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/5/1570

  19. Coen JL, Schroeder W, Quayle B (2018) The generation and forecast of extreme winds during the origin and progression of the 2017 Tubbs Fire. Atmosphere, 9: 462. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/9/12/462

  20. Corkhill N (2018) The role of hydraulic jump phenomenon in the rapid spread of the 8-9 October 2017 Tubbs Fire [unpublished Master's Thesis]. San Francisco State University

  21. County of Sonoma and City of Santa Rosa, (2017) 360° Drone Panoramics: Coffey Park. https://www.sonomacountyrecovers.org/360-drone-panoramics-coffey-park/

  22. Sonoma County Vegetation Mapping and LiDAR Program, (2014) Cartographic building footprints–file geodatabase. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ffb79090659d47ebade90717c0e8cecb

  23. Congalton RC (2001) Accuracy assessment and validation of remotely sensed and other spatial information. Int J Wildland Fire 10:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF01031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Landis J, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. KPIX 5 CBS (2017) Tubbs Fire brought death and destruction to Coffey Park. https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/10/14/tubbs-fire-brought-death-and-destruction-to-coffey-park/ Accessed 16 Aug 2020

  26. Cohen JD (2000) Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. J Forest 98:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gibbons P, Van Bommel L, Gill AM, Cary GJ, Driscoll DA, Bradstock RA, Knight E, Moritz MA, Stephens SL, Lindenmayer DB (2012) Land management practices associated with house loss in wildfires. PLoS ONE 7:e29212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Syphard AD, Brennan TJ, Keeley JE (2014) The role of defensible space for residential structure protection during wildfires. Int J Wildland Fire 23:1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Penman SH, Price OF, Penman TD, Bradstock RA (2019) The role of defensible space on the likelihood of house impact from wildfires in forested landscapes of south eastern Australia. Int J Wildland Fire 28:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. The Press Democrat (2017) Safaris West owner had 'a thousand souls' to save from Tubbs fire. https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news/safari-west-owner-had-a-thousand-souls-to-save-from-tubbs-fire/?gallery=6DAE706D-9E0F-4F33-B588-477C1A0AADD6 Accessed 18 Aug 2020

  31. Blanchi R, Leonar J (2005) Investigation of bushfire attack mechanisms resulting in house loss in the Act Bushfire 2003. Bushfire CRC Report. April 2005

  32. Alten A (2019) Assessing wildfire damage from high resolution satellite imagery using classification algorithms. MS thesis. San Jose State University. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/898

  33. KTVU Fox 2 San Francisco (2017) Firefighter perspective – Tubbs fire Santa Rosa. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCNSDk7fyYE. Accessed 19 Sept 2020

  34. McNamara, Derek (2017) Crowdsourcing Defensive Actions at the 2017 California Tubbs Fire. Geospatial Measurement Solutions, LLC. https://gmsllc.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b1cec356a04b4553aaaaeb46a0897605 Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  35. Sonoma County GIS Site (2020) Parcels public shapefile. https://gis-sonomacounty.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/2202c1cd6708441f987ca5552f2d9659

  36. Tuckman M (2017) Sonoma County 2014 NAIP Imagery. https://sonomaopenspace.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=30cd0f4386e645138d6470c90c3d0b74 [Accessed: 18-August-2020].

  37. HuffPost (2018) Tubbs fire: California's most destructive fire in history. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX0KTdO7wSo.

  38. Baader B (2018) Those first 24 hours. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9lQwchsyeU. Accessed 22 Sept 2020

  39. The Press Democrat (2017) Santa Rosa fires: first hours of the devastating Tubbs fire in 9 minutes. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7Udu6hh-9U. [Accessed: 18-September-2020].

  40. City of Santa Rosa (2019) Last October (2019) documentary. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/wC5w5J836XUnal%20After%20Action%20Report_City%20of%20Colorado%20Springs.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2020

  41. Viramontes Family Group (2017) Santa Rosa fire 2017 – Coffey Park at Barns road. [Video file]. Retrived from https://youtu.be/qCYjQYy0ORg?list=PLPhXK8FybsaK4Ci-OXlVl7Cg6ILgH0znq. Accessed 25 Sept 2020

  42. Scott R (2017) Coffey Park drone fly over.. 10/10/2017. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/OVN1x_--S2w?list=PLPhXK8FybsaK4Ci-OXlVl7Cg6ILgH0znq. Accessed 27 Sept 2020

  43. Industrial Ebikes (2017) Santa Rosa firestorm October 10 9 17 9 2017. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/X6Eo9jgH9V8. Accessed 29 Sept 2020

  44. SFGate (2017) Incredible photos show how one man's house was saved in Tubbs Fire. [Video file]. https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Incredible-photos-show-how-one-man-s-house-was-12271112.php Accessed 16 Aug 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Alex Maranghides for his unique insights regarding the importance of defensive actions and exposures from heat fluxes in assessing building response. We also thank the reviewers of this manuscript for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Funding

This work was funded in part through United States Forest Service Contract 12045319P002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geospatial Measurement Solutions, LLC, 2149 Cascade Ave Ste 106A PMB 240, Hood River, OR, 97031, USA

    Derek McNamara

  2. United States Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Seattle, WA, USA

    William Mell

Authors
  1. Derek McNamara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Mell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek McNamara.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent for Publication

We provide consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21560 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McNamara, D., Mell, W. Towards the use of Remote Sensing for Identification of Building Damage, Destruction, and Defensive Actions at Wildland-Urban Interface Fires. Fire Technol 58, 641–672 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01170-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01170-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation