Skip to main content
Log in

Variability and Error Rates in Fire Alarm Audibility Measurements and Calculations

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Audibility of fire alarm systems at mandated levels is critical to ensure a warning is heard by building occupants. To accomplish this, designers and installers utilize on-scene measurements as well as design calculations to ensure that the audibility of the fire alarm system is as designed as required. Despite this, there is a dearth of information on the error and variability rates associated with these experiments and calculations. To fill in this gap, a three-room and connected corridor test setup was utilized and multiple repeat audibility tests were conducted across 12 configurations of different receiving rooms and door positions. Calculations were then conducted utilizing two oft-used and referenced methods. Ultimately, the experimental measurements had a coefficient of variation of 3.0% to 10.9% depending on the configuration. The calculation methods had differences from the experimental average of − 6.8% to 8.0% combined. It is shown that designers and installers should consider making multiple measurements to capture the experimental variability or at least assume it is 10% and if the measurement errors are randomized, could be as high as 20% or more. Meanwhile, a 10% factor of safety should be considered with the calculation methods to ensure the design implementation exceeds the intended audibility. Some additional observations from the experiments and calculations are also discussed including that the tests and calculations provide justification for the code requirements that a notification appliance be present in each bedroom or room that may have a door closed and, if it is a smoke alarm, that it be interconnected to other alarms to ensure audibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bukowski RW, Waterman TE, Christian WJ (1975) Detector sensitivity and siting requirements for dwellings. NIST GCR 75-51, National Institute of Standards and Technology

  2. Harpe SW, Waterman TE, Christian WJ (1977) Detector sensitivity and siting requirements—phase 2. NBS GCR 77-82, National Institute of Standards and Technology

  3. Ahrens M (2014) Smoke alarms in US home fires. NFPA Report, March

  4. Bukowski RW, Peacock RD, Averill JD, Cleary TG, Bryner NP, Walton WD, Reneke PA, Kuligowski ED (2008) Performance of home smoke alarms: analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. NIST Technical Note 1455-1, February 2008 revision

  5. Milarcik EL, Olenick SM, Roby RJ (2008) A relative time analysis of the performance of residential smoke detection technologies. Fire Technol 44:337–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cleary T (2014) Performance of dual photoelectric/ionization smoke alarms in full-scale fire tests. Fire Technol 50:753–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleary T (2014) Results from a full-scale smoke alarm sensitivity study. Fire Technol 50:775–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee A (2005) The audibility of smoke alarms in residential homes. CPSC-ES-0503

  9. Bruck D, Thomas I (2010) Smoke alarms in dwellings: timely activation and effective notification. Center for Environmental Safety and Risk Engineering, Victoria University. Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Fire Protection Association (2016) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 72: the national fire alarm and signaling code. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halliwell RE, Sultan MA (1986) Attenuation of smoke detector alarm signals in residential buildings. Division of Building Research, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bowyer A, Butler H, Kew J (1981) Locating fire alarm sounders for audibility. BSRIA application guide, vol 81. Building Services Research and Information Association, Guildford

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schifiliti RP, Custer RLP, Meacham BJ (2016) Design of detection systems. In: Hurley MJ et al (eds) SFPE handbook, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  14. Underwriters Laboratories Standard 217 (2015) Single and multiple station smoke alarms, 7th edn. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL), Northbrook, IL

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruck D, Thomas I (2007) Waking effectiveness of alarms (auditory, visual, and tactile) for adults who are hard of hearing. NFPA Research Foundation Report

  16. Housing and Urban Development (2009) Chapter 4: Sound transmission class guidance. In: Supplement from the Noise Notebook

  17. Bruck D, Ball M (2005) Sleep and fire: who is at risk and can the risk be reduced? In: Fire safety science—proceedings of the eighth international symposium

  18. Ashley E, DuBois J, Klassen M, Roby R (2005) Waking effectiveness of audible, visual, and vibratory emergency alarms across all hearing levels. In: Proceedings of the NFPA Research Foundation SUPDET symposium

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Combustion Science & Engineering, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Olenick.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Havey, P., Munoz, M., Klassen, M.S. et al. Variability and Error Rates in Fire Alarm Audibility Measurements and Calculations. Fire Technol 54, 1725–1744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0755-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0755-6

Keywords

Navigation