Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Testing of Fire Scenario Hypotheses: A Bayesian Inference Approach

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire models are routinely used to evaluate life safety aspects of building design projects and are being used more often in fire and arson investigations as well as reconstructions of firefighter line-of-duty deaths and injuries. A fire within a compartment effectively leaves behind a record of fire activity and history (i.e., fire signatures). Fire and arson investigators can utilize these fire signatures in the determination of cause and origin during fire reconstruction exercises. Researchers conducting fire experiments can utilize this record of fire activity to better understand the underlying physics. In all of these applications, the heat release rate and location of a fire are important parameters that govern the evolution of thermal conditions within a fire compartment. These input parameters can be a large source of uncertainty in fire models, especially in scenarios in which experimental data or detailed information on fire behavior are not available. A methodology is sought to estimate the amount of certainty (or degree of belief) in the input parameters for hypothesized scenarios. To address this issue, an inversion framework was applied to scenarios that have relevance in fire scene reconstructions. Rather than using point estimates of input parameters, a statistical inversion framework based on the Bayesian inference approach was used to calculate probability distributions of input parameters. These probability distributions contain uncertainty information about the input parameters and can be propagated through fire models to obtain uncertainty information about predicted quantities of interest. The Bayesian inference approach was applied to various fire problems using different models: empirical correlations, zone models, and computational fluid dynamics fire models. Example applications include the estimation of steady-state fire sizes in a compartment and the location of a fire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The examples in this paper were adapted from material provided during a PyMC tutorial session at the SciPy 2011 Conference [35]. The material is licensed under the GNU GPL v3.

  2. http://code.google.com/p/bayes-fire/

  3. The test report gives the height of the compartment as 2.18 m, which is a misprint. The compartment was 2.13 m high.

References

  1. Redsicker DR, O’Connor JJ (1997) Practical fire and arson investigation, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirk P, DeHaan J (1997) Kirk’s fire investigation. Brady, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kruse C (2013) The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility. Soc Stud Sci 43(5):657–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. National Fire Protection Association (2011) Guide for fire and explosion investigations. NFPA 921, Quincy

    Google Scholar 

  5. Babrauskas V (2005) Charring rate of wood as a tool for fire investigations. Fire Saf J 40(6):528–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Overholt KJ (2013) Forward and inverse modeling of fire physics towards fire scene reconstructions. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin

  7. Overholt KJ, Ezekoye OA (2012) Characterizing heat release rates using an inverse fire modeling technique. Fire Technol 48(4):893–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jahn W, Rein G, Torero JL (2012) Forecasting fire dynamics using inverse computational fluid dynamics and tangent linearisation. Adv Eng Softw 47(1):114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cowlard A, Jahn W, Abecassis-Empis C, Rein G, Torero J (2010) Sensor assisted fire fighting. Fire Technol 46:719–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koo SH, Fraser-Mitchell J, Welch S (2010) Sensor-steered fire simulation. Fire Saf J 45(3):193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lautenberger C, Rein G, Fernandez-Pello C (2006) The application of a genetic algorithm to estimate material properties for fire modeling from bench-scale fire test data. Fire Saf J 41(3):204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marquis D, Guillaume E, Camillo A, Rogaume T, Richard F (2013) Existence and uniqueness of solutions of a differential equation system modeling the thermal decomposition of polymer materials. Combust Flame 160:818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaos M, Khan M, Krishnamoorthy N, de Ris J, Dorofeev S (2011) Evaluation of optimization schemes and determination of solid fuel properties for CFD fire models using bench-scale pyrolysis tests. Proc Combust Inst 33(2):2599–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello C (2009) Generalized pyrolysis model for combustible solids. Fire Saf J 44(6):819–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello AC (2011) Optimization algorithms for material pyrolysis property estimation. Fire Saf Sci 10:751–764. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.10-751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rein G, Lautenberger C, Fernandez-Pello AC, Torero JL, Urban DL (2006) Application of genetic algorithms and thermogravimetry to determine the kinetics of polyurethane foam in smoldering combustion. Combust and Flame 146(1):95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holladay KL, Sharp JM, Janssens M (2011) Automatic pyrolysis mass loss modeling from thermo-gravimetric analysis data using genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pp 655–662

  18. Wang J, Zabaras N (2005) Using Bayesian statistics in the estimation of heat source in radiation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 48(1):15–29

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Miki K, Prudencio E, Cheung S, Terejanu G (2013) Using Bayesian analysis to quantify uncertainties in the \({\rm H} + {\rm O}_2 \rightarrow {\rm OH} + {\rm O}\) reaction. Combust Flame 160(5):861–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McGrattan K, Toman B (2011) Quantifying the predictive uncertainty of complex numerical models. Metrologia 48:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Petrovich WP (1998) A fire investigator’s handbook: technical skills for entering, documenting, and testifying in a fire scene investigation. Charles C Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bayes T, Price R (1763) An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, FRS communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, AMFRS. Philos Trans (1683–1775):370–418

  23. Gelman A, Carlin J, Stern H, Rubin D (2003) Bayesian data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bolstad WM (2010) Understanding computational Bayesian statistics. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Andrieu C, de Freitas N, Doucet A, Jordan M (2003) An introduction to MCMC for machine learning. Mach Learn 50(1):5–43

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuen K (2010) Bayesian methods for structural dynamics and civil engineering. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Bal N, Rein G (2013) Relevant model complexity for non-charring polymer pyrolysis. Fire Saf J 61(0):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oliphant TE (2006) A guide to NumPy, vol 1. Trelgol Publishing, Spanish Fork

  29. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P et al (2001) SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python

  30. Hunter J (2007) Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9(3):90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Patil A, Huard D, Fonnesbeck C (2010) PyMC: Bayesian stochastic modelling in Python. J Stat Softw 35(4):1–81

    Google Scholar 

  32. McGrattan K, Hostikka S, McDermott R, Floyd J, Weinschenk C, Overholt K (2013) Fire dynamics simulator, user’s guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, 6th edition, September 2013

  33. Peacock RD, Jones WW, Reneke PA, Forney GP (2005) CFAST—Consolidated model of fire growth and smoke transport (version 6): user’s guide. Special Publication 1041, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, December 2005

  34. Oliphant TE (2007) Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 9(3):10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fonnesbeck C, Flaxman A (2011) An introduction to Bayesian statistical modeling using PyMC, SciPy 2011 Conference, Austin, Tutorial Session, 11 July 2011

  36. Fleury R (2010) Evaluation of thermal radiation models for fire spread between objects. Master’s thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch

  37. Drysdale D (2002) An introduction to fire dynamics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Steckler KD, Quintiere JG, Rinkinen WJ (1982) Flow induced by fire in a compartment. NBSIR 82-2520, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, September 1982

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ofodike A. Ezekoye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Overholt, K.J., Ezekoye, O.A. Quantitative Testing of Fire Scenario Hypotheses: A Bayesian Inference Approach. Fire Technol 51, 335–367 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0384-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0384-z

Keywords

Navigation