Abstract
Building fire safety is driven by regulations and technical building codes, at least as a minimum requirement. As fire protection engineers (FPEs) design fire safety measures based on requirements in the regulations, they are often viewed as the primary agents in ensuring the fire safety of buildings. However, their mission often starts with given building design features, such as interior spatial layout, exterior shape, site plan, and so forth, which are mostly determined by architects. The only exception is where the FPE is invited to assist in the project planning, feasibility and early concept design stages of a project. Regardless, architects also can influence building fire safety performance, whether or not they explicitly acknowledge or understand this. Although architects design buildings within the boundaries of the regulatory requirements, the architect’s focus is often related to the visual and spatial aesthetics of buildings linked to building form and functionality, which are not subject to the regulations. These aesthetics can sometimes compete with fire safety objectives. As such, buildings can be unsafe in certain situations due to unintended effects of building design features on actual fire safety performance. This research describes the relationship between architecturally conceived building design features, design expectations for fire safety systems, and the actual or conceivable fire safety performance of the building. Steps are proposed that FPEs can take to identify and address potentially competing objectives and deliver increased fire safety performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilson A, (2001) Green federal facilities: an energy, environmental, and economic resource guide for federal facility managers and designers, National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO
Zimmerman A, Eng P (2006) Integrated design process guide, CMHC Ottawa
Capon DS (1983) Categories in architectural theory and design: derivation and precedent. Des Stud 4(4):215–226
Mbamali I, Aiyetan O, Kehinde J (2005) Building design for buildability: an investigation of the current practice in Nigeria. Build Environ 40(9):1267–1274
Mora R, Bitsuamlak G, Horvat M (2011) Integrated life-cycle design of building enclosures. Build Environ 46(7):1469–1479
WBDG (2012) Design objectives: national institute of building science. http://www.wbdg.org/design/designobjectives.php. Accessed 27 Nov 2012
ICC (2009) Building Department Administration: Delmar Cengage Learning
Imrie R, Street E (2011) Architectural design and regulation. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
Ben-Joseph E (2004) Future of standards and rules in shaping place: beyond the urban genetic code. J Urban Plan Dev 130(2):67–74
Hadjisophocleous GV, Benichou N, Tamim, AS (1998) Literature review of performance-based fire codes and design environment. J Fire Prot Eng 9(1):12–40
Meacham B (eds) (1999) International experience in the development and use of performance-based fire safety design methods: evolution, current situation and thoughts for the future. In: fire safety science–proceedings of the 6th international symposium
Meacham B, Bowen R, Traw J, Moore A (2005) Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs. Build Res Inf 33(2):91–106
Otter Ad, Emmitt S (2008) Design team communication and design task complexity: the preference for dialogues. Arch Eng Des Manag 4(2):121–129
Allen W (1987) The fire research lecture: fire and the architect-the communication problem, Building Research Establishment
Prak NL (1984) Architects: the noted and the ignored. Wiley, Chichester
ICC (2009) International building code
Pickard, Q (2002) The architects’ handbook. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Meacham B, Park H, Engelhardt M, Kirk A, Kodur V, van Straalen I, et al. (eds) (2010) Fire and collapse, Faculty of Architecture Building. Delft University of Technology: data collection and preliminary analysis. In: proceeings of the 8th international conference on performance-based codes and fire safety design methods, Lund University, Sweden
Bouwkunde (1970). http://www.flickr.com/photos/stylos/2958066460. Accessed 21 Feb 2013
Photos compiled from TU Delft Photographers 2008
Bouwkunde (2008) Portrait of the Faculty of Architecture of Delft University of Technology. TU Delft, Delft
Røssel LK, Franck TS (eds) (2012) Fire brigade intervention times in high-rise buildings. In: 9th international conference on performance-based codes and fire safety design methods, June 20–22, SFPE, Hong Kong
Pan X, Han CS, Dauber K, Law KH (2006) Human and social behavior in computational modeling and analysis of egress. Autom Constr 15(4):448–461
Wurzer G, Hinneberg H, Illera C, Swoboda S, Jonas A (eds) (2009) Architectural patterns enabling reconfigurable exit routes for complex buildings. Traffic and Granular Flow, Citeseer
Tubbs J, Meacham B (2007) Egress design solutions: A guide to evacuation and crowd management planning. Wiley, New York
O’Neill MJ (1991) Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfinding accuracy. Environ Behav 23(5):553–574
Hölscher C, Meilinger T, Vrachliotis G, Brösamle M, Knauff M (2006) Up the down staircase: wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. J Environ Psychol 26(4):284––299
Kobes M, Helsloot I, de Vries B, Post J (2010) Exit choice, (pre-)movement time and (pre-)evacuation behaviour in hotel fire evacuation—behavioural analysis and validation of the use of serious gaming in experimental research. Procedia Eng 3:37–51
Ouellette M (1993) This way out. Prog Arch 74(7):39–42
Sixsmith A, Sixsmith J, Canter D (1988) When is a door not a door? A study of evacuation route identification in a large shopping mall. In: JD Sime (ed) Safety in the built environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 62–74
Till RC, Babcock JS., “Proof of Concept: Use of Eye-Tracking to Record How People Use Exit Signage,” In: Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, Peacock RD, Kuligowski ED, Averill JD, editors, Springer US; 2011. p. 209-19
Nilsson D (2009) Exit choice in fire emergencies: influencing choice of exit with flashing lights. Lund University, Lund
Benthorn L, Frantzich H (1996) Fire alarm in a public building: how do people evaluate information and choose evacuation exit? Citeseer
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Peter Johnson for reading the manuscripts and providing valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, H., Meacham, B.J., Dembsey, N.A. et al. Enhancing Building Fire Safety Performance by Reducing Miscommunication and Misconceptions. Fire Technol 50, 183–203 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0365-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0365-2