Skip to main content
Log in

The Government’s Role in Government-owned Banks

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we reinvestigate the question of whether government banks are inferior to private banks. We use cross country data from 1993 to 2007 to trace the different types of government banks. These types comprise banks that acquire distressed banks, normal banks, or no banks at all. Contrary to common belief, the evidence shows that unless government banks are required to purchase a distressed bank because of political factors (the government’s role), their performances are at par with that of private banks. This fact particularly holds true in countries with poor records on political rights and governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cole and White (2012) discuss and analyze why commercial banks failed during the financial crisis. Similarly, Poghosyan and Čihak (2011) investigate the determinants of bank distress in Europe.

  2. For example, Dinç (2005) presents that government banks’ increase in their lending during election years relative to private banks. Micco et al. (2007) demonstrate that during election years, government banks increase their lending and exhibit reduced returns on assets (ROA). Brown and Dinç (2005), Khwaja and Mian (2005), and Leuz and Oberholzer–Gee (2006) present similar results.

  3. SDC is a private company selling data about merger activity, securitization, private funds, and so on.

  4. Factiva is a database that includes Dow Jones News, Reuters, and the Wall Street Journal, among others.

  5. For example, in 2002, the Taiwanese government encouraged government banks to consolidate other normal banks into large banks to promote operational effectiveness during their financial reform. One such bank is Taiwan Bank, a 100 % government-owned bank, which merged with Central Trust of China to establish the Financial Holding Company. See Taipei Times, July 2, 2007.

  6. These include the Bankers Almanac, American Banker, Bank Director, and ABA Banking Journal.

  7. We also control the bank privatization effect. For example, when government banks are privatized to become the private banks sample, we exclude them from both government and private banks sample after the privatization.

  8. All the names of government banks and distressed banks are not reported here but are available upon request.

  9. See website: http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/krung-thai-bank-public-company -ltd -history/.

  10. Officials of the banking watchdog said that Hana Bank had solved the question of insolvency for the Korea Merchant Bank, its largest shareholder, by purchasing 45 billion won worth of securities and financial bonds. As for the remaining 10 billion won of the bank’s economic responsibility, the FSC decided to give time until the ongoing trial at the Seoul District Court for compensation of deposit insurance is completed. Website: http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_ 0286-26836864 _ITM.

  11. See website: http://stockdata.indonesiafinancetoday.com/keyfacts/BDMN.

  12. See website: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/riskmanagers/message/1785.

  13. If the sample periods of acquirers cover more than two M&As, then we only keep the first one to avoid overlapping.

  14. All the target banks are private banks and are excluded from the sample of private banks prior to the acquisition.

  15. As no merging dates for the non-acquirer government banks are indicated, the event dates are difficult to define.

  16. For brevity, we do not show the detailed results of distressed-acquirer private banks, but they are available upon request.

  17. Our benchmark is still the value-weighted private banks for each country.

  18. Regarding this question, we appreciate the suggestion of a referee.

  19. See Petersen (2009) for a detailed discussion.

  20. In the literature, although slightly different from our study, several authors have discussed the lending behavior of banks among different institutional factors. See Qian and Strahan (2007), Bae and Goyal (2009), Haselmann et al. (2009), and Qi et al. (2010) for details.

  21. Freedom House is an international nongovernmental organization based in Washington, D.C. that conducts research and advocates democracy, political freedom, and human rights. It publishes an annual report that assesses the degree of perceived democratic freedoms in each country, which is used in political science research. See website: http://www.freedomhouse.org/.

  22. Considering the increasing importance of country governance, Kaufmann et al. (2007) updated their WGI. The WGI involves six dimensions of governance and covers 212 countries from 1996 to 2006. This index comprises regulatory quality, rule of law, control of corruption, political stability, absence of violence, voice and accountability, and government effectiveness.

  23. Regarding this question, we appreciate the suggestion of a referee.

References

  • Bae KH, Goyal V (2009) Creditor rights, enforcement and costs of loan finance. J Finance 64:823–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Cull R, Jerome A (2005) Bank privatization and performance: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. J Bank Finance 29:2355–2379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin J, Hasan I, Wachtel P (2005) Privatization matters: Bank efficiency in transition countries. J Bank Finance 29:2155–2178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos JWB, Kool CJM (2006) Bank efficiency: The role of bank strategy and local market conditions. J Bank Finance 30:1953–1974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri N, Cosset JC, Fischer K, Guedhami O (2005) Privatization and bank performance in developing countries. J Bank Finance 29:2015–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CQ, Dinç IS (2005) The Politics of Bank Failures: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Q J Econ 120:1413–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RA, White LJ (2012) Déjà vu all over again: The causes of U.S. commercial bank failures this time around. J Financ Serv Res 42(1–2):5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinç IS (2005) Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging countries. J Financ Econ 77:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Focarelli D, Pozzolo AF (2008) Cross-border M&As in the financial sector: Is banking different from insurance? J Bank Finance 32:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2010) Freedom in the world country ratings 1972–2010. http://www.freedomhouse.org

  • Haselmann R, Pistor K, Vig V (2009) How law affects lending. Rev Financ Stud 23:549–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannotta G, Nocera G, Sironi A (2007) Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry. J Bank Finance 31:2127–2149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2007) Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996–2006. Working Paper No. 4280, World Bank Policy Research

  • Khwaja A, Mian A (2005) Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Q J Econ 120:1371–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz C, Oberholzer-Gee F (2006) Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. J Financ Econ 81:411–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews K, Murinde V, Zhao T (2007) Competitive conditions among the major British banks. J Bank Finance 31:2025–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson WL (2005) The economics of bank privatization. J Bank Finance 29:1931–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian A (2003) Foreign, private domestic, and government banks: New evidence from emerging markets. Working Paper, Mimeo, University of Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Micco A, Panizza U, Yaňez M (2007) Bank ownership and performance. Does politics matter? J Bank Finance 31:219–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen M (2009) Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches. Rev Financ Stud 22:435–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poghosyan T, Čihak M (2011) Determinants of Bank Distress in Europe: Evidence from a New Data Set. J Financ Serv Res 40(3):163–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri M, Rocholl J, Steffen S (2011) Global retail lending in the aftermath of the US financial crisis: Distinguishing between supply and demand effects. J Financ Econ 100:556–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Roth L, Wald JK (2010) Political rights and the cost of debt. J Financ Econ 95:202–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian J, Strahan PE (2007) How Laws and Institutions Shape Financial Contracts: The Case of Bank Loans. J Finance 62:2803–2834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan RG, Zingales L (2003) The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the twentieth century. J Financ Econ 69:5–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza P (2004) The effects of government ownership on bank lending. J Financ Econ 72:357–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen CH, Lin CY (2012) Why Government Banks Underperform: A Political Interference View. J Finan Intermediation 21:181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Yung Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, CH., Hasan, I. & Lin, CY. The Government’s Role in Government-owned Banks. J Financ Serv Res 45, 307–340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-013-0168-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-013-0168-0

Keywords

JEL

Navigation