Skip to main content
Log in

IMF Bank-Restructuring Efficiency Outcomes: Evidence from East Asia

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report new findings on bank efficiency in East Asian countries for the pre- and post-IMF restructuring periods. We find that bank efficiency has improved, but only to the pre-IMF intervention level, and that restructured banks are not more efficient than their unrestructured counterparts. Different restructuring measures have different effects. Bank closures are economically justified, but mergers show short-term efficiency losses. Recapitalization and reprivatization of badly performing banks lead to efficiency improvement, but also increase government ownership. Ease of entry that has allowed for more foreign bank participation results in slightly improved performance of badly performing banks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We also conducted an evaluation of the efficiency performance of the closed banks prior to their closures. The results, which are available on request, indicate that their pre-closure performance is significantly worse than their unclosed counterparts, suggesting that the closure decisions are supported on economic grounds.

  2. CAMEL stands for Capital, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, and Liquidity. This framework has been used as a regulatory tool for banks in the United States, India, and the four countries in this study.

References

  • Alper A, Onis Z (2002) Emerging market crises and the IMF: rethinking the role of the IMF in the light of Turkey’s 2000–2001 financial crises. METU Int. Conference VI, September, Ankara, Turkey

  • Amel D, Barnes C, Panetta F, Salleo C (2004) Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: A review of the international evidence. J Bank Finance 28:2493–2519. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ataullah A, Cockerill T, Le H (2004) Financial liberalization and bank efficiency: a comparative analysis of India and Pakistan. Appl Econ 36(17):1915–1924. doi:10.1080/000368404200068638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran NK (2002) Productivity analysis in the service sector with data envelopment analysis. Avkiran, Camira

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2005) Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, Hoboken (NJ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN (2007) International comparisons of banking Efficiency. Financ Markets Inst Instrum 16(3):119–144. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0416.2007.00121.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, DeYoung R (1997) Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. J Bank Finance 21:849–870. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00003-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Humphrey DB (1992a) Megamergers in banking and the use of cost efficiency as an antitrust defence. Antitrust Bull 37:541–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Demsetz RS, Strahan PE (1999) The consolidation of the financial services industry: causes, consequences, and implications for the future. J Bank Finance 23:135–194. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00125-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Clarke GRG, Cull R, Klapper L, Udell GF (2005) Corporate governance and bank performance: A joint analysis of the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership. J Bank Finance 29(8–9):2179–2221. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi di Patti E, Hardy DC (2005) Financial sector liberalization, bank privatization, and efficiency: Evidence from Pakistan. J Bank Finance 29:2381–2406. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongini P, Claessens S, Ferri G (2001) The political economy of distress in East Asian financial institutions. J Finan Serv Res 19:5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Skully M (2006) Evaluating cost performance of banks in the Asia Pacific. Econ Pap 25:61–70 December Special Issue

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprio G, Klingebiel D (2003) Episodes of systemic and borderline financial crises. World Bank financial crises database

  • Carbo-Valverde S, Humphrey DB, Lopez del PR (2007) Do cross country differences in bank efficiency support a policy of ‘national champions’. J Bank Finance 31(7):2173–2188. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvallo O, Kasman A (2005) Cost efficiency in the Latin American and Caribbean banking systems. J Int Financ Mar, Inst and Mon 15(1):55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Casu B, Girardone C, Molyneux P (2004) Productivity change in European banking: a comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches. J Bank Finance 28:2521–2540. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebenoyan AS, Cooperman ES, Register CA, Hudgins SC (1993) The relative efficiency of stock versus mutual S&Ls: a stochastic frontier approach. J Financ Serv Res 7:151–170. doi:10.1007/BF01046903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffai ME, Dietsch M, Lozano-Vivas A (2001) Technological and environmental differences in the European banking industries. J Financ Serv Res 19:147–162. doi:10.1023/A:1011107404524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung MT, Liao Z (2005) Recapitalization of Thailand’s banks after the 1997 crisis: Interpretation and critique from a neo-institutional perspective. Asia Pac Bus Rev 11:411–427. doi:10.1080/13602380500068375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S, Hasan I (2005) Ownership, governance, and bank performance: Korean experience. Financ Mark Inst Instrum 14(4):215–242. doi:10.1111/j.0963-8008.2005.00104.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens S, Demirguc-Kunt A, Huizinga H (2001) How does foreign entry affect domestic banking markets? J Bank Finance 25(5):891–911. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(00)00102-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke GRG, Cull R, Shirley MM (2005) Bank privatization in developing countries: a summary of lessons and findings. J Bank Finance 29(8–9):1905–1930. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ (1996b) A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data Envelopment analysis (computer) program”. CEPA Working Papers No. 7/96, University of New England, Armidale

  • Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software. Kluwer Academic, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Ariccia G, Detragiache E, Rajan R (2005) The real effect of banking crises. IMF working paper no. WP/05/63

  • Demirgüç-Kunt A, Detagiache E (1998) The determinants of banking crises in developing and developed countries. IMF Staff Pap 45(1):81–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt A, Detragiache E (2005) Cross-country empirical studies of systemic bank distress: a survey. World Bank working paper no. 2143

  • Dietsch M, Lozano-Vivas A (2000) How the environment determines the efficiency of banks: a comparison between French and Spanish banking industry. J Bank Finance 24:985–1004. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00115-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favero CA, Papi L (1995) Technical efficiency and scale efficiency in the Italian banking sector: a non-parametric approach. Appl Econ 27(4):385–395. doi:10.1080/00036849500000123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries S, Taci A (2005) Cost efficiency of banks in transition: evidence from 289 banks in 15 post communist countries. J Bank Finance 29:55–81. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harada K (2005) Measuring the efficiency of banks: successful mergers in the Korean banking sector. CNAEC research series no. 05–03

  • Harada K, Ito T (2005) Rebuilding the Indonesian banking sector: economic analysis of bank consolidation and efficiency. JBICI Rev 12:32–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman TE, Storbeck JE, Byrnes P (2001) Allocative efficiency in branch banking. Eur J Oper Res 134:232–242. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00257-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes A, Yaisawarng S (2004) Sensitivity and dimensionality tests of DEA efficiency scores. Eur J Oper Res 154:410–422. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00178-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isik I, Hassan MK (2003) Financial disruption and bank productivity: the 1994 experience of Turkish banks. Q Rev Econ Finance 43(2):291–320. doi:10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00194-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce JP (2004) Adoption, implementation and impact of IMF programs: a review of the issues and evidence. Comp Econ Stud 46:451–467. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky GL, Reinhart CM (1998) Financial crises in Asia and Latin America: then and now. Am Econ Rev 88(2):444–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim MZA (2001) Comparative bank efficiency across selected ASEAN countries. ASEAN Econ Bull 18:289–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasman A, Kasman SK, Carvallo O (2005) Efficiency and foreign ownership in banking: an international comparison. Discussion paper series, Dokuz Eylül University

  • Laeven L (1999) Risk and Efficiency in East Asian banks. World Bank working paper no. 2255 (December)

  • Leightner J, Lovell CAK (1998) The impact of financial liberalization on the performance of Thai banks. J Econ Bus 50(2):115–131. doi:10.1016/S0148-6195(97)00073-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano-Vivas A, Pastor JT, Pastor JM (2002) An efficiency comparison of European banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. J Prod Anal 18:59–77. doi:10.1023/A:1015704510270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megginson WL (2005) The economics of bank privatization. J Bank Finance 29(8–9):1931–1980. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park K, Weber WL (2006) A note on efficiency and productivity growth in the Korean banking industry, 1992–2002. J Bank Finance 30(8):2371–2386. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psiouras F (2008) International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis. Rev Quant Financ Account 30:187–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sealey C, Lindley JT (1977) Inputs, outputs and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institution. J Finance 32:1251–1266. doi:10.2307/2326527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen H (1998) The impact of the IMF-supported stabilization programs on inflation in developing countries: the experience of Turkey in last decade. J Econ Admin Sci 12(1–2):81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng A (1996) Bank restructuring: lessons from the 1980s. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih SHM (2003) An investigation into the use of mergers as a solution for the Asian banking sector crisis. Q Rev Econ Finance 43:31–49. doi:10.1016/S1062-9769(01)00135-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang H, Zoli E, Klytchnikova I (2000) Banking crises in transition economies: Fiscal costs and related issues. World Bank policy research working paper No.2484

  • Weill L (2003) Banking efficiency in transition economies: the role of foreign ownership. Econ Transit 11:569–592. doi:10.1111/1468-0351.00155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White H (1980) Nonlinear regression on cross-section data. Econometrica 48(3):721–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J, Nguyen N (2005) Financial liberalization, crisis and restructuring: a comparative study of bank performance and bank governance in South East Asia. J Bank Financ 29:2119–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (2003) Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver. Kluwer Academic, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants of the FMA (Asia) Conference (Auckland, 2006) for their very useful comments and suggestions. Many thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers and editor of the JFSR for their great comments, which have significantly contributed to improving the quality of this paper, and to Sandra Sizer for her excellent editing. Luc Can gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the Australia–Asia Award during the research of this paper; part of which was drawn from his Doctoral dissertation completed at Monash University, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Can.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ariff, M., Can, L. IMF Bank-Restructuring Efficiency Outcomes: Evidence from East Asia. J Financ Serv Res 35, 167–187 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-008-0047-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-008-0047-2

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation