Skip to main content
Log in

The sustainability of the commons: giving and receiving

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the use of a cost-free reward mechanism in the exploitation of a common property resource. We implement an experimental study involving a two-stages game where agents first decide resource appropriation and then have the opportunity to distribute cost-free bestowals. We observe that subjects link the two activities in such a way that appropriation determines the distribution of bestowals which in turn contributes maintaining low appropriation levels, thus avoiding the destruction of the common resource. Not all the potential bestowals are distributed, however.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W., & Vesterlund, L. (2003). The carrot or the stick: rewards, punishments and cooperation, American Economic Review, 93(3).

  • Baland, J. M., & Platteau, J. P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources. Is there a role for rural communities? London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd edn.). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochet, O., Page, T., & Putterman, L. (2006). Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. P. (2007a). The demand for punishment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62, 522–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. P. (2007b). Punishing free-rider: how group size affects mutual monitoring and the provision of public goods. Games and Economic Behavior, 60, 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casari, M. (2005). On the design of peer punishment experiments. Experimental Economics, 8, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casari, M., & Plott, C. R. (2003). Decentralized management of common property resources: experiments with a centuries-old institution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51(2), 217–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermak, J. M., & Krause, K. (2002). Individual response, information and intergenerational common pool problems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas, A., Febrero, M., & Fraiman, R. (2004). An anova test for functional data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 47, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving forces of informal sanctions. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017–2030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkinger, J. (1996). Efficient private provision of public goods by rewarding deviations from average. Journal of Public Economics, 62, 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkinger, J., Fehr, E., Gächter, S., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2000). A simple mechanism for the efficient provision of public goods: experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 90(1), 147–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans, Nature, 415(10).

  • Fischbacher, U. (1999). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Reference Manual and Tutorial, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.

  • Fischer, M. E., Irlenbusch, B., & Sadrieh, A. (2004). An intergenerational common pool resource experiment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

  • Floristán, A. (1995). Geografía de navarra. Pamplona: Diario de Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (1993). Econometric analysis (2nd edn.). New York: Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, D. H., Neugebauer, T., & Sadrieh, A. (2009). An experimental analysis of optimal renewable resource management: the fishery. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 263–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iriarte Goñi, I. (1996). Bienes comunales y capitalismo agrario en Navarra: 1855–1935. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, España.

  • Lapuente Martínez (1990). Las Améscoas (Estudio histórico-etnográfico). Junta del Monte Limitaciones de las Améscoas y Gobierno de Navarra.

  • Masclet, D., Noussair, C., Tucker, S., & Villeval, M. (2003). Monetary and non-monetary punishment in the voluntary contributions mechanism. American Economic Review 93(1).

  • Mason, C. F., & Phillips, O. R. (1997). Mitigating the tragedy of the commons through cooperation: an experimental evaluation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34, 148–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moxnes, E. (2000). Not only the tragedy of the commons: misperceptions of feedback and policies for sustainable development. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moxnes, E. (2004). Misperceptions of basic dynamics, the case of renewable resource management. System Dynamics Review, 20(2), 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikiforakis, N., & Normann, H. T. (2008). A comparative statics analysis of punisment in public-good experiments. Experimental Economics, 11, 358–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (1980). Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations. American Journal of Sociology, 85(6), 1356–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osés-Eraso, N., Udina, F., & Viladrich-Grau, M. (2008). Environmental versus human-induced scarcity: do they trigger the same response? Environmental and Resource Economics, 40, 529–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osés-Eraso, N., & Viladrich-Grau, M. (2007). On the sustainability of common property resources. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86(2).

  • Sefton, M., Shupp, R., & Walker, J. (2007). The effects of rewards and sanctions in provision of public goods. Economic Inquiry, 45(4), 671–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spagnolo, G. (1999). Social relations and cooperation in organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, M., Haigner, S., & Kocher, M. G. (2010). Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1540–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuria Osés-Eraso.

Additional information

Financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (project ECO2009-12836) is gratefully acknowledged. Montserrat Viladrich-Grau acknowledges the support of the Barcelona Graduate School of Economics Research Network and of the Government of Catalonia. We thank Frederic Udina, Jordi Brandts, Emilio Domínguez, Jorge Nieto and members of SEED research group for helpful comments and discussions. We also thank the helpful comments of two anonymous referees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osés-Eraso, N., Viladrich-Grau, M. The sustainability of the commons: giving and receiving. Exp Econ 14, 458–481 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9276-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9276-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation