Abstract
We replicate the strategy-method experiment by Fischbacher et al. (Econ. Lett. 71:397–404, 2001) developed to measure attitudes towards cooperation in a one-shot public goods game. We collected data from 160 students at four different universities across urban and rural Russia. Using the classification proposed by Fischbacher et al. (2001) we find that the distribution of types is very similar across the four locations. The share of conditional cooperators in our Russian subject pools is comparable to the one found by Fischbacher et al. in a Swiss subject pool. However, the distribution of the other types differs from the one found in Switzerland.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112, 419–436.
Croson, R. (2007). Theories of commitment, altruism and reciprocity: Evidence from linear public goods games. Economic Inquiry, 45, 199–216.
Durkheim, E. (1960). The division of labor in society (4th edn.). New York: Free Press.
Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2006). Heterogeneous social preferences and the dynamics of free riding in public good. CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2006-01, University of Nottingham.
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404.
Gächter, S. (2007). Conditional cooperation. Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and psychology. A promising new cross-disciplinary field. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gächter, S., & Thöni, C. (2005). Social learning and voluntary cooperation among like-minded people. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 303–314.
Gächter, S., Herrmann, B., & Thöni, C. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in norm enforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 822–823.
Keser, C., & van Winden, F. (2000). Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102, 23–39.
Kocher, M. G., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., Netzer, R. J., & Sutter, M. (2007). Conditional cooperation on three continents. Working Papers, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.
Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 81, 1068–1095.
Wirth, L. (1964). On cities and social life. In A. J. Reiss (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We are grateful for the invaluable research assistance provided by Sergei Zorya, Lena Gerasimenko, Michael Belaev, Jevgenji Maslukov, Alexei Bibikov and Valerie Kowalenko. We also would like to thank the Universities of Agricultural Sciences Brijansk (Kokino), Samara (Ust-Kinel), the Belgorod State Technical Academy of Building Materials, and the All-Russian Distance Institute of Finance and Economics (ARDIFE) in Kursk for supporting us with the necessary infrastructure and Hans Kolb-Wellpappe Ltd. for the donation of cardboard screens used in the experiments. We are grateful for comments from Tim Cason, Therese Faessler, Simon Gächter, Nikhil Masters, and two anonymous referees.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrmann, B., Thöni, C. Measuring conditional cooperation: a replication study in Russia. Exp Econ 12, 87–92 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9197-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9197-1