Skip to main content
Log in

Framing the first-price auction

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We revisit the result that, in laboratory independent private values auction, the first-price sealed bid and descending clock (or Dutch) implementations are not isomorphic. We investigate the hypothesis that this arises from framing and presentation effects. Our design focuses on a careful construction of subject interfaces that present the two environments as similarly as possible. Our sessions also consist of more auction periods to test whether any initial framing effects subsequently decrease over time. We find the difference between the implementations persists. To further investigate the difference, we report on an intermediate implementation which operates like the Dutch auction, but in which the clock continues to tick to the lowest price without informing bidders when others have bid on the object.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cason, T. N., & Friedman, D. (1997). Price formation in single call markets. Econometrica, 65, 311–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., & Reimann, R. (2003). About Face 2.0: The essentials of Interaction Design. Indianapolis: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger, V. M., Smith, V. L., & Titus, J. A. (1980). Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch, and sealed-bid auctions. Economic Inquiry, 18, 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. C., Roberson, B., & Smith, V. L. (1982). Theory and behavior of single object auctions. In Smith V. L. (Ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Volume 2. Greenwich CT: JAI Press

  • Cox, J. C., Smith, V. L., & Walker, J. M. (1988). Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 61–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, R., & Razzolini, L. (2003). Explaining overbidding in first price auctions using controlled lotteries. Experimental Economics, 6, 123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gode, D., & Sunder, S. (1993). Allocative efficiency of markets with zero intelligence (ZI) traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. H. (1995). Auctions: A survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press

  • Katok, E., & Kwasnica, T. (2003). Time is money: The effect of clock speed on seller’s revenue in Dutch auctions. Penn State University working paper

  • Selten, R., & Buchta, J. (1998). Experimental sealed bid first price auctions with directly observed bid functions. In D. Budescu, I. Erev, & R. Zwick (Eds.), Games and Human Behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport. Erlaaum Ass

  • Smith, V. L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review, 72, 923–955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodore L. Turocy.

Additional information

JEL Classification D44, C90

Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turocy, T.L., Watson, E. & Battalio, R.C. Framing the first-price auction. Exp Econ 10, 37–51 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9130-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9130-4

Keywords

Navigation